StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name: Title: Important models of justices’ behaviour at the Supreme Court Professor: Date due The most important model of behaviour justices have adopted Legal decisions and behaviour have turned on to be interested on the behaviour of the justices at the Supreme Court around the globe…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Important Models of Justices Behaviour at the Supreme Court
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court"

Download file to see previous pages

There are three models that are mostly displayed by the justices and the judges of the Supreme Court when deciding cases in the supreme courts. These are strategic, attitudinal and the legal orientations. Strategic behaviour refers to the justices’ actions to maximize their overall benefits in light of their expectations concerning their choices of other actors involved in the decision making process. Others are legal and the attitudinal models that aid explain the legal verdict arrived by the justices at the supreme courts Though the attitudinal models of justice behaviour was initially establish in the US, students and other legal practitioner have found the strategic models of behaviour alluring.

This dissent of behaviour focuses on the interpedently nature of judges and justices’ behaviour in their decision making, which does not shun the policy preferences of the justices’ .This a strategic begins with assumption that justices are motivated by their policy preferences, but further acknowledges that realization of those preferences is a function of other relevant actors. As notes by (Epstein and Knight) Justices may be primarily seekers of legal policy, but they are not unconstrained actors who make decisions based only on their own ideological attitudes.

Rather, justices are strategic actors who realize their ability to achieve their goals depends on a consideration of the preferences of other actors, the choices they expect others to make, and the institutional context in which they act. (10). This implies that whole a justice acting on the basis of his attitudes, another justices acting on the same preferences may be expected to behave differently based on strategic considerations. For instance, for justice behaviour‘s preferences mat depend on the other justice and judges reactions and opinions (08-956 wood v. Allen. (01/20/10) Recent literature provides that strategic concerns of behaviour go beyond attitudinal as they tend to explain further other reasons that attitudinal approach may not offer.(Wood v. Allen, Wood v, state and Alabama, US, 1998) In recent findings, attitudinal concerns have challenged by judges who tend to adopt strategic orientation towards and it was evidenced in a variety of contexts.

First, when setting their agendas (Rice v. Collins, 546 US 333,339), second, when writing majority opinions (Wood v. State, 715 819 (1998)) and lastly issuing separate opinions, even on the same case(s) (Williams v. Taylor, 529 US 362,462). Several studies undertaken by Brace and Hall at the aggregate (Brace and Hall; Hall and Brace, 147-162) and individuals (Brace and Hall; Hall and Brace) provides explanations on the dissenting behaviour. They note that when making judicial decisions, justices and judges decide not to follow their ideological differences in certain circumstances in anticipation of decisions by exogenous factors such as electoral constituency, in order to keep job .

Other evidence that pursue a strategic line of inquiry as is vital in the decision making process. This is because the strategic models of supreme court justices takes into account other factors more

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court Research Paper”, n.d.)
Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1441024-which-model-attitudinal-strategic-and-legal-has
(Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court Research Paper)
Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/law/1441024-which-model-attitudinal-strategic-and-legal-has.
“Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1441024-which-model-attitudinal-strategic-and-legal-has.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court

Juvenile Justice System - Effectiveness to Rehabilitate Youth Offenders

The therapeutic intervention and punishment models of justice also appear to be incomplete.... If these two models coexist in a jurisdiction, they are in constant conflict.... The most important facet of all this is the “best interest of the child” theory that guided the courts lingers in the purpose clauses of juvenile codes throughout the world....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Storm Center by David OBrien

Similar to the centers of actual storms, the supreme court is a peaceful place.... O'Brien explains in his timely and enlightening analysis, starting right from the selection of Justices to their selection of cases to the phraseology of decisions, the High court is as theme to the political climate as Congress as well as the executive branch.... As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated that the court turns into what is called a ''storm centre'' when it tackles a passion-stirring concern weather it be assimilation, crime, abortion, affirmative action....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Due Process vs. Crime Control Model in Criminal Justice

The two frameworks present the most competing models within the criminal justice system and result in the ever-increasing tension bringing disharmony and conflict presently observable within the same system.... The models aim at challenging crime but insist on issuing the most appropriate justice to both the law enforcers and the arrestees.... It is important to note that the due process model and the crime control model are two frameworks within the criminal justice system under conflict throughout the world for many years....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Short Answer Questions

he model that best describes the behavior of supreme court justices is the legal model.... In essence, there are three basic models of judicial decision making.... In essence, there are three basic models of judicial decision making.... In addition, the court follows certain procedures in solving disputes while public opinion has no outlined procedure for addressing issues.... pparently, public opinion has a great influence on the decisions made in court (Geer et al....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

French and American Court System

The American Court System has basically the same degrees of organization with federal and state courts hearing the case when it is first brought up, a Court of Appeals for appeals made from the decision of the federal and state courts and the supreme court which has the final say when the case has not been resolved in the Court of Appeals.... (American Bar Association, 2006); ( Wasby, 2000) As compared to the United States where the supreme court has the final authority on the interpretation of the Federal Constitution and all statutes and regulations created pursuant to it, the authority in France which has the final say on the interpretation of the law is divided into two: the Conseil dÉtat for administrative cases and the Court of Cassation for civil and criminal cases....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Functioning of the Supreme Court

The essay "The Functioning of the supreme court" discusses the conflict of ideology and personality and the rare temperamental exchange, it functions via a set of customs and way of life which has been developed within a lot of years.... As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated that the court turns into what is called a storm center when it tackles passion-stirring concern weather it is assimilation, crime, abortion, affirmative action.... iven the reality that the court is an oligarchy and all relies on only 9 lords, every one of whom is expected to have a strong belief and a powerful persona; it would be astonishing if personal hostility did not take place in the procedures....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Problem of Juvenile Delinquency and Changes in Middle Class Attitudes and Practices in The Nineteenth Century

This paper outlines juvenile delinquency in the 19th century, models of criminality and delinquency, antecedents to reform and youth justice reform in the United States.... To begin, this essay turns to an analysis of the models of criminality and delinquency which influenced both society and jurisprudence during the early half of the 19th century.... During this period there were a variety of models of the causes of criminal behavior as well as delinquency; these models were applicable to both young offenders as well as adults....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Role of Economics and Economic Behaviour in Competition Law

This work called "Role of Economics and Economic behaviour in Competition Law" describes economic concepts of Competition Law, free competition in internal markets.... The author takes into account that Competition Law in the EU requires the appreciation of economics and economic behavior to implement effectively....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us