StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers - Article Example

Cite this document
Summary
This article discusses the disagreement on human nature among the greatest philosophers. The paper has briefly looked into different philosophies Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Kant in order to understand which theory has more weight. As human nature cannot be defined absolutely…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers"

The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers Absolute knowledge doesnt exist regardless which discipline it is. The human nature is just one discipline. Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Kant etc., all have given their insights about human nature but none has grasped it completely. This seems similar to the concept of God because no one has fully comprehended God or the concept of God either. The reason is, among many things, one puzzling thing about human nature is its complexity.

It would be easier to understand the human nature if we just consider this creature a creature of habit, but it is not that simple. Plato gave his Allegory of the Cave explaining this habitual nature (Soccio 141). A man lives all his life in a cave, he considers his environment as the only reality, as if nothing exists outside of it. On exposing him to the sunlight, this person thinks he is dreaming, that the fresh air, green grass and the singing birds are hallucinations.The habitual nature of human is Plato’s version.

Aristotle and Kant on the other hand focused more on how humans should behave; the maxim behind every action. Aristotle gave two levels of human behavior the one where he only acts as a man and the other where he acts as if there is a divine spirit within him, thus achieving a life higher than mere human nature (Aristotle 191). This is very different from Plato’s narrative because Kant implies that man by nature is evil or corrupt therefore he has to confirm to moral law in order to live a better life.

He is not simply a product of its environment, he is inherently corrupt. It is hard to pick one theory and reject the other. It will also be negating the introduction that there is no absolute truth or knowledge. In Kant’s theory there is space for spirituality. There must be divine authority overseeing man’s activities. Plato on the other hand is more supportive of nurture as opposed to the nature. Kant considers human nature as a composition of feelings, one relations and cognitions, and these aspects are governed by a priory prescribed by a “higher cognitive power” (Frierson 13)Descartes is also in agreement with Kant that there is a divine authority.

And hence man has a defined nature. René Descartess held anti-elitist and egalitarian views on human nature (Lopston 24). It also implies that considering this premise one has to accept that humans have been created as part of a grand design. The basic principles of all major religions state that divinity tests the humans against some commandments/rules, where the man has to abstain from evil and practice goodwill in good faith. For this reason when the concept of divinity is incorporated into the debate about human nature, the defined concept of human nature cannot be ignored.

It becomes difficult to accept that humans are just another species, an organism of carbon decomposing every minute. If the concept of divinity is involved in the debate then spirituality and life after death also need to be considered. The human nature needs to be understood from the concept of the grand design, then he is not merely a man in a cave. As stated in the beginning of the paper that there cannot be any absolute knowledge therefore there cannot be any absolute conclusion. The paper has briefly looked into different philosophies in order to understand which theory has more weightage.

As human nature cannot be defined absolutely (if it were, all philosophers would have agreed on some common point) it is probably more accurate to incorporate both sides of arguments; that man is a product of his environment, also it has been created by a grand design and therefore has some qualities or nature imprinted in his DNA.ReferencesAristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Ed. Paul Negri and William Kaufman. Mineola: Dover Publications, 1998. Print.Frierson, Patrick R. What Is the Human Being?

 Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013. Print.Loptson, Peter. Readings on Human Nature. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview, 1998. Print.Soccio, Douglas J. Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub., 1992. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Mini-Essay Philosophy of Human Nature Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631608-mini-essay-philosophy-of-human-nature-plato-aristotle-descartes-and-kant
(Mini-Essay Philosophy of Human Nature Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and Essay)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631608-mini-essay-philosophy-of-human-nature-plato-aristotle-descartes-and-kant.
“Mini-Essay Philosophy of Human Nature Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631608-mini-essay-philosophy-of-human-nature-plato-aristotle-descartes-and-kant.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers

Humanistic Approach, Leadership and Motivation, Machiavelli, and Conflict Resolution and Vision

It is important to note that, the humanistic theory make some assumptions about human nature, which are not accepted as solid or complete.... I will use this knowledge to impact those around me by helping them understand human behaviours and how they can foster motivation and effective leadership.... The humanistic approach to management helps to understand human beings as absolutely self-serving or independent individuals.... The first thing is that human beings deserve and expect their dignity and worth to be respected under all circumstances....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Disagreements on the Interpretations of the Zhuangzi

Because the two authors read and interpreted the Zhuangzi using two different terms with differing ideologies, there are disagreements between the two, wherein Brindley's interpretation of the Zhuangzi shows that the universe has a cyclic nature accessible through transcendence, while Puett's interpretation states that the universal hierarchy is linear with Heaven at the apex, and man must live in balance with it without having to enter transcendence.... For Brindley, what the universe creates that man does not see normal are the products of how the Dao allows diversity to exist in the cosmos, while for Puett anything that exists in nature, regardless of whether humans consider it normal or not are still the products of the will of Heaven and are thus “heavenly”....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Sterling Harwoods Objections to Utilitarianism

Therefore, no protests should be made because they will lead to chaos among the majority and the marginal.... This action reveals how unrealistic the demands of utilitarianism are towards human nature.... Its aim is to appraise the ethical value of human action based on happiness.... According to this objection, utilitarianism demands too much from human beings when argued from a real life situation....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Relationship between Human Beings and the Natural World

philosophers who have worked on these issues are Kant, Montaigne, Descartes, and Pascal etc.... (Farrell, 2006) Montaigne thus makes seemingly conflicting festivities of both the universality of and the dissimilarity among human beings.... Final conclusions might not be accomplished, for human beings subsist in the realm of estimation, final answer might not be available to human beings (except perhaps for knowing this), but life must still be lived....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Greatest Masterpieces of the Greek Philosopher

The paper "the greatest Masterpieces of the Greek Philosopher" presents the plays of Sophocles, written in the form of a mythological story.... Death is only one of the manifestations of life - the law of nature.... The feeling of sorrow and sadness, which follow the whole play, makes the reader feel pity for the cogency of the human destiny and its miserableness, despite the status and position of the person in the world.... Firstly, we should understand that the notion of tragedy concerns only a human being....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Ethics for Everyday Life

philosophers have used eudaimonia to explain a state in which the person accepts the citizen virtues as instinctive behaviors.... What are at least three ways that these two philosophers are in disagreement with the Sophists: Parmenides, Thrasymachus, and Callicles.... A good life is not all about money but rather revolves around reasoning and functionality of a human being....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

The US Constitution, for the People or the Nation

ohn Locke, Baron Montesquieu, and Jean-Jaques Rousseau were examples of the greatest philosophers during the Age of Enlightenment in eighteenth-century Europe.... Age of Enlightenment, an ideology that supported, among other issues, a government built and operated by the general population, one governed by laws, not a monarchy.... Within this context, Locke says it is important to always remember that the right of enforcement is not by nature the right of the ruler....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

De Incarnatione' of St Athanasius

The theory of Saint Athanasius is divided in among 9 different chapters on issues such as refutation of Jews/Gentiles creation death and resurrection as well as creation and others.... This is in contradiction with the teachings of Plato who presupposes that god created the world out of already existing matter; Athanasius is in disagreement with such a claim since in his opinion it is in contradiction to the Christian reality that god is unlimited (Lewis, n....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us