StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper 'Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals' presents the first contribution of Immanuel Kant to moral philosophy. It analyses the motivation for humans for their actions. Kant’s moral philosophy is based on the concepts of categorical imperatives…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals"

Kants "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals" The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals is believed to be the first contribution of Immanuel Kant to moral philosophy. It analyses the motivation for human for his actions. Kant’s moral philosophy is based on the concepts of categorical imperatives which are introduced in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. The categorical imperative proposed by Immanuel Kant places the standard for moral good in actions rather than traditions or beliefs. Kant argued that the actions of people should be judged as moral or immoral based on their personhood and dignity. The actions of a person should be treated as the right or wrong for that person only. In other words, morality is a principle originating inside a persons mind which compels that person to act in a particular way. We usually label a parson’s activity as good or evil based on our traditional beliefs and customs rather than the significance of that activity to that person. Family, society and the religion influence us very much in the formulation of our attitudes, thoughts, views etc. There is a tension between Kant’s conception of morality as rooted in universal reason and the manner in which most of us received our moral education. Moral education usually proceeds through following moral examples. We learn what it means to be good by observing the character and actions of those we believe to be good (family, friends, and religious figures). Kant challenges the underlying premise of this ordinary conception of moral education. How can I know that the character and actions of any given individual are good unless I have an independent conception of moral goodness? Kant even extends this argument to such an exemplary figure as Jesus. Write a paper examining the cogency of Kant’s challenge to the idea that moral norms can be derived from examples. This paper addresses not only the cogency of Kant’s critique, but the further question of how moral education is possible in Kantian terms also. Morality is often been defined by us with respect to traditions and customs. It is a fact that most of the religions are giving moral education to their communities based on their beliefs and customs. For example, Christians believe in Jesus Christ and they give moral education to their communities based on the teachings of Jesus. On the other hand, Muslims give moral education based on the teachings of Islam. Christians strongly argue against the killing of all the human beings whereas some of the fundamental Muslim groups believe that killing of enemies of Islam as a sacred act rather than a sin. Muslim fundamentalists justify the killing of innocent people citing examples like the massacres of America and Israel against the Muslim community. Muslim fundamentalists developed their moral laws or moral education based on the bitter experiences faced by the Muslim community at some parts of the world. According to Kant, an action can never be considered moral, if it is motivated by certain examples rather than the consciousness and wisdom of the individual. In other words, even if we face some bad experiences from some other people we have no moral right to take revenge for that. It is a fact that American soldiers are killing many of the Muslim fundamentalists in Iraq and Afghanistan in the name of war on terror. America is citing the examples of 9/11 incident for the moral justification of their actions. However, according to Kantian moral principles, neither the killing of Muslim fundamentalists in Afghanistan and Iraq, nor the killing of innocent people in other parts of the word by Bin Laden or terrorists, can be justified We normally assess our actions and other’s actions based on the observation of the character and actions of those we believe to be good (family, friends, and religious figures). For example, Christians put the actions of Jesus as a base in assessing the actions of others. Jesus taught his disciples to love their neighbors just like they love themselves. So, Christians consider loving of others as a moral act. However, Kant has different ideas. Kant argued that loving of neighbors or other people is the right action only for Jesus. In his opinion, Jesus does not have the right to lead even his disciples in a particular way. In other words, the actions and teachings of Jesus are right only for Jesus. It is not necessary that the rights of Jesus would be the rights of others. Since Jesus failed to collect support for his actions from all the people in the world, Kant opposed the idea of labeling all the actions of Jesus as moral. According to Kant, an action became moral only when it is accepted as moral by all the people in the world. For example, Jesus taught his followers to have one wife only. In his opinion, even the thought of a person about having sex with another person’s wife or girls other than his wife, is a sin. Having more than one wife is an immoral act as per the teachings of Jesus. On the other hand, Muslims can keep more than one wife and it is a morally accepted action for them. In other words, Christians and Muslims differ in their views about the number of wives one person can keep. According to Kantian philosophy, neither the keeping of one wife, nor the keeping of more than one wife, can be considered as a moral action, since these actions lacks universal acceptances. These actions are based on the teachings of the religion and cannot be considered as a morally bright action. Kant challenges these types of moral education and argued that a person cannot label the character and actions of any given individual as good unless he has an independent conception of moral goodness. From the above arguments, one may develop doubts about how moral education is possible in Kantian terms. Suppose, a Christian has only one wife and she happens to be sexually impotent. According to Christian moral principles, he cannot marry another girl or divorce his present wife. On the other hand, same person could have married another girl if he was a Muslim. Here the religion plays an important role in determining the morality of an action. Kant argued that instead of religious beliefs, individual wisdom should be used in such cases in determining the morality. In other words, Kant believed that even a Christian can marry and keep more than one wife if the individual wisdom and the circumstances demand that. In some cases, the outcomes of some wrong actions may appear as good. Suppose a restaurant owner reduced the price of some food items on a particular day. The customers may treat this action as a morally right action since they are getting food items on cheaper rates from this food outlet, at least for a day. When all other restaurant owners nearby, charge more to the same food, the activities of the first restaurant owner could be treated as a moral acts by the customers. On the other hand, suppose that the restaurant owner reduced the price, not because of his mercy towards the customers, but for selling out the rotten food. In this case, the motives of the restaurant owner are not to help the customers, but to avoid or reduce his losses. Such acts cannot be considered as morally right even though the customers are getting cheaper food. China is accused of selling consumer products for cheaper price in international markets. China’s intention is to increase the profits by selling more volumes of items. In this case also China’s tactics cannot be morally justified according to Kant’s moral philosophy. In short, the motives determine whether an action is right or wrong rather than the outcomes of the action. To conclude, Kant’s moral education principles were based on the interests of the entire humans in this world rather than the interests of a particular individual or group of people. According to Kant, an action would be moral if the person would be able to place the interests of others above his self interests while performing that action. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1, n.d.)
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1749152-kants-groundwork-of-the-metaphysics-of-morals
(Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1)
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1749152-kants-groundwork-of-the-metaphysics-of-morals.
“Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1749152-kants-groundwork-of-the-metaphysics-of-morals.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

John Stuart Mills Utilitarianism

In what Kant called the metaphysics of morals, actions are right or good not from their purpose or of their desired end but by their very volition, unconditional of any internal or external influence.... Mill and Kant are structurally so different in as much as Mill puts primary importance, and strictly, on empiricism, or natural experience as the basis for morality, whereas Kant's basis for morality (the morality of metaphysics) stems from a priori knowledge or what he calls pure reason - laws which are evident in every rational being....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The case against hurting others

The author of the paper “The case against hurting others” seeks to evaluate issue of hurting others through the eyes of philosophers Thomas Nagel and Immanuel Kant.... On the context of hurting others, Nagel presents a moralistically sensitive stance.... hellip; The author believes that the best way to understand what the other person is feeling is to actualize with the feelings of the other person....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

In defense of international sweatshops

The four different standards that have been proposed for setting wages and labor standards in international sweatshops are:a.... ome-country standards – This standard proposes that international corporations pay the same wages and provide the same labor standards anywhere they operate… This standard would be very welcome for local workers in an international sweatshop but may be prohibitive for the international company and removes the incentive for setting up shop in a developing country....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Should Moral Theory Be Based More on Rules or Feelings

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.... The dilemma of moral theory to be based on rules or feelings has evoked a new debate among the philosophers of ethics.... According to Bernard Williams (cited by Valerie Tiberius) traditional ethical theories render it impossible to lead good and meaningful lives because they… size moral duty or the promotion of external values at the expense of the personal commitments that make our lives worth living from our own perspective....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Complexity of human being and their moral actions

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.... The question is; how complex?... How is this complexity related to human actions?... It is obvious that human actions are normally preceded by reasoning and decision-making.... For these actions to be deemed ethical or moral, decisions and the reasoning that led… However, the truth is, the type of evidence required to make an ethical and a moral decision differs from that needed to make an immoral and unethical decision....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Kants Position Concerning the Death Penalty

Since 1976 Texas has put a number of individuals to death for committing specific crimes that were of such a nature to warrant such a punishment, since the United States Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty that same year.... (Greg v.... Georgia, 1976) A huge 92 percent of the… (Pinkerton, 1992) It is for this reason that Texas has the highest number of executions than any other state and there is a celebratory atmosphere that takes place with each new execution. I believe that Kant would most My reasoning is based on the thinking that Kant was of the opinion that if the offender committed murder that he must die because there was no possible substitute that could satisfy justice....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Categorical Imperative

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.... This essay describes the concept of categorical imperative and observation of the issue of suicide through the noted paradigm.... ategorical imperative is an essential thought of the deontological reasoning worldview.... It has two essential definitions....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Two Main Types of Morality

The paper presents that moral decisions are a complex subject that requires a mixture of reason/emotion in making them.... There are two main types of morality.... The first is an absolute type of ethics in which some acts are absolutely wrong, all of the time.... hellip; The tendency to want an overarching theory of morality:- whether absolute or relative in nature – tends to lead to a lessening of freedom and a worsening of the conditions that people live under....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us