StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Bill Clinton and George Bush view national security strategy as a critical component of the financial security and foreign policy of the country. Their approaches towards this policy differed to some extent, and this paper is aimed to underline the major differences and similarities between policies outlined in each national security strategy.
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush"

National Security Strategy: Bill Clinton vs. George Bush Bill Clinton and George Bush view national security strategy as a critical component of thefinancial security and foreign policy of the country. Their approaches towards this policy differed to some extent, and this paper is aimed to underline the major differences and similarities between policies outlined in each national security strategy. On the one hand, the main difference between these approaches was caused by political situations and foreign policies provided by Bill Clinton and George Bush.

Clinton's defeat motivated him to adopt a more cautious, pragmatic, and moderate approach reflected the post-Cold war situation needed the policy of "engagement and enlargement". In contrast, President Bush provides the policy of national power maximization and international cooperation against terrorism as a major threat of contemporary world order and peace. His national policy reflects the events and the threats America now faces (terrorism). In general, Bush's policy is more radical in comparison with American foreign policy tradition.

In contrast to Clinton, Bush supports pre-emptive military action against hostile states and terrorist groups seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction. As well as Clinton, Bush calls for engagement, but in the way of cooperation especially marked that the USA "will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary" (2002) to defend national interests and security. The major difference is that Bush reject the single-minded approach, adopted by Clinton, of multilateralism for its own sake. The similarity of both strategies is that they calls for spreading democracy and human rights in other countries, but Bush underlined that this is especially important for Muslim countries today.

Both of them are aimed to protect American nation creating strong foreign security policy, but Clinton and Bush employ different doctrines to support their foreign policies. Also, the similarity is that Clinton and Bush view U.S. military strength as the only one with a global mission and global capabilities. Taking into account the Realistic and Idealistic understanding of both policies, it is possible to characterize the strategy of Clinton as a liberal one, and the strategy of Bush as a combination of realistic and liberal approaches.

The following example shows the realistic features of the policy of Bush: "We are guided by the conviction that no nation can build a safer, better world alone. Alliances and multilateral institutions can multiply the strength of freedom-loving nations. The United States is committed to lasting institutions.." (2002). The realism of Bush is aimed to maximize the leading role of the USA to counter the dangers of terrorism and impose the multilateral understanding of justice and peace. It shows the deep-seated understanding of American national strategy and supports long-standing American beliefs about foreign policy.

The liberal feature of Bush's strategy is that his National security announced democratic principles and rights for all nations around the world, which coincides with the liberalism of Clinton who stated that: "At the same time, this does not mean we or the international community must tolerate gross violations of human rights within those borders" (1995). On the other hand his realistic assumption can be explained saying that: ".as a matter of common sense and self-defense, America will act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed." (2002). Liberal position of Clinton towards foreign policy lies in his vision on the state power and engagement.

He supposed that: "the nonnegotiable demands of human dignity; the rule of law; limits on the absolute power of the state; free speech; freedom of worship; equal justice; respect for women; religious and ethnic tolerance; and respect for private property." (1995). His policy feels lack of realism peculiar to a "new policy" of Bush. It is possible to conclude that national security strategy of Clinton and Bush are similar as they aimed to protect American citizens from military invasion, but the main difference is found in the core of their policies: liberal approach used by Clinton, and combination of two (realistic and liberal) employed by Bush.

References1. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement.1995. Available at: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nss/nss-95.pdf 2. The National Security Strategy of the United States. 2002. Available at:http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/politics/1509987-national-security-strategy-bill-clinton-vs-george-bush
(National Security Strategy Bill Clinton Vs. George Bush Essay)
https://studentshare.org/politics/1509987-national-security-strategy-bill-clinton-vs-george-bush.
“National Security Strategy Bill Clinton Vs. George Bush Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1509987-national-security-strategy-bill-clinton-vs-george-bush.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush

The Contemporary Practice Of Political Spin

bush won the election in the year 2000.... This devoutness has been the target of the Republican party of the United States ever since george W.... … Some examples you might consider include the 2004 presidential elections, the war in Iraq, the "War on Terror," same-sex marriage, abortion, corporate financial scandals, bill Clintons infamous Lewinsky deposition and so on.... Neither can the US government openly state that it considers closing the borders of the country a viable option for ensuring home security, considering that a giant portion of the American workforce comprises of immigrants living and working illegally....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Compare and Contrast US policy toward Cuba under George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton

administration has continued with the Business embargo in both president Bill Clintons Administration as well as the President bush's governance.... Cuba is the most populated country of the Caribbean.... The traditions and culture developed in the nation draw from aboriginal Taino, and Spanish colonialism… The U....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Proposal

The Asia-Pacific Region

Reportedly, the United States has several involvements in the Asia-Pacific region that incumbent Secretary of State Hillary clinton views it as “a fulcrum of global politics and economics”.... This paper investigates the politics and economics of the Asia-Pacific region.... hellip; The author of the text highlights that the Asia-Pacific region needs a strong political-economic relationship with the US in the name of sustainable development and global justice....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Changes in the United States from 2000 to 2001

The efforts are from a wide range including internal and external plans. The manners in which they execute these changes vary due to the President Bush takes over leadership from bill clinton.... This is exhibited when the change in taxation is implemented by bush.... bush emerged the winner as Clinton left office.... bush, however, lowered the rates after taking over the office.... He introduces lower taxation rates contrary to the bill that had higher taxation system....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The US Invasion of Iraq

Shortly after the Gulf War in which America successfully defeated Iraq, there emerged rumours that the Iraq government had plans to manufacture weapons of… As this rumour continued to spread, the United Nations Organization reacted by launching a plan to inspect Iraq and confirm whether these allegations were true of just mere speculations (Art & Waltz, 2003)....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

How Do the NSC and APNSA Operate

The idea of this research emerged from the author's interest and fascination in how do the national security Council (NSC) and The Assistant to the President for national security Affairs (APNSA) operate?... This research will begin with the statement that the national security agency (NSA) is the U.... On the other hand, the assistant to the president for national security affairs  APNSA is the senior-most official in the executive office of the president who serves as the chief advisor stationed in the white house to the president of the United States on national security issues....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

US National Security Policy Towards Pakistan During the Last Three Administrations

The writer of this paper aims to analyze the US national security Policy towards Pakistan during the last three Administrations.... The future of the US national security policy towards Pakistan will largely depend on Pakistan's willingness to support the US.... And this was not actually planned by the Pakistani administration of that time, rather they were forced to have a policy of non-alignment because of the inclination of both the British and the US governments towards the Indian administration under the Indian national Congress which was seen as a party which shared similar policies with the Labor Party in Britain and the Democrats in the United States....
20 Pages (5000 words) Research Paper

International Crisis: United Nations

george bush had limited influence on policy-making in Washington since he had to be given leeway by Congress (Jakobsen 1).... President bill clinton then signed the act into law.... national security against the Iraq threat.... However, America's action was made difficult since Saddam had dictatorial dominance over Iraq hence had a larger influence on the Iraqi decision-making body as compared to bush.... hellip; From the comparison, the European approach believes that an all-out opposition does not bring the shift in the security community because of the EU's growing assertiveness....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us