StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Consensus Between Violence And Argument - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The right argument is morally better than violence. The paper "Consensus Between Violence And Argument" discusses the thesis about that all conflicts should and must be settled in a peaceful way. It also gives information about the structure of right argument or argumentation…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
Consensus Between Violence And Argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Consensus Between Violence And Argument"

Consensus Between Violence And Argument The right argument is morally better than violence; all conflicts should and must be settled in a peaceful way. Most people are pacifist due to their religious faith, belief that war is wasteful and unproductive and a non-religious belief in the sacredness of life. The right argument is opposition to war and includes actions that encourage fairness and human rights. Right argument or argumentation includes debate, conversation, persuasion, and negotiation for the conclusion to be arrived at through coherent reasoning. Aristotle’s approach to the subject matter shows that he believed not entirely on capital punishment. He suggests that rule of law be the baseline in any society to allow deliberation as a way of avoiding violence. In that sense, no death is justifiable and as such only homicide should be direct capitally punished by death. On the other hand, Plato's view is exposure to violence leads to one act in a similar manner hence tries to justify the human character. Plato never came out clearly concerning violence and the argument aspects to bring about peace in society. Yet the teacher-student relationship that existed between Plato and Aristotle yielded much in the discussion of violence and argument. Argumentation puts in place logic, inference, and procedural rules in the artificial and real world. Eristic dialogue covers argumentation, a social debate where victory over an antagonist is the primary goal. This art of right argument protects their self-interest incoherent dialogue and in the process of dialogue. The art of argumentation is used in law, in trials when preparing arguments for court presentation and in the testing legitimacy of evidence. Right argument comprises identifying premises where conclusions are derived, the establishment of “burden of proof” to determine the person who made an initial claim and identifying goals of contributors in dialogue. At the end of an argument, a valid conclusion must be given with good reason explaining the same. A good argument must be built with two premises and one concluding remark. Argumentation is good in a situation where evidence does not exist especially in handling scientific, epistemic, nature, and moral where science cannot apply. Violence is good in handling dispute like border disputes, insurgency, and hostility. In politics, some kinds of argumentation are morally wrong, and some kinds of violence are morally right. Argumentation is never a solution in many nations since it only works when there is peace in the nation, and no other nation wants to attack the nation in question. Argumentation is morally upright only if the nations under conflict also handle disputes through argumentation. However, if the nations under disagreement handle the dispute in different angles, then violence is morally right for a nation to defend itself from intrusion. Argumentation will be morally wrong if it will lead to the country being under the control of the enemy (The Times Literary Supplement). Since the world is never perfect, many people believe that violence is never wrong. A state has a mandatory obligation to protect their citizens violently or through argument depending on the situation on the ground. Citizens have a right to defend the nation at all cost, in the case of war. They must retaliate with violent means and in this reason, argumentation will be wrong keeping in mind life and resources being lost to the enemy. It will be morally wrong if a nation that upholds argumentation fails to carry out important moral responsibility because of their stand for peace and respect for human life. Refusal to participate in war is wrong since the citizen's life will be at stake thus going against respect for human life. In the case of extreme evil, violence is morally right but argumentation becomes morally wrong. In Nazi Germany war, for example, extreme wickedness prevailed, and retaliation was impeccable, all affected parties were to defend themselves. The war according to the time's literary supplement wrote that they had discovered killing of spirit in the body was more horrible than actual war. “The world reeks ... a Dark Age has begun a new” (The Times Literary Supplement). Most nations’ belief that going to war is a moral duty and must be fulfilled as far as their citizens are concerned. Almost all nations take it as an ethical duty to honor those who died during war especially the soldiers. Every year, a date is set for remembrance to celebrate their contribution in fighting for their country. Countries are encouraged to follow the rules of war to avoid misconception by its citizens and other nations participating in the war. If violence is morally wrong, then soldiers who in the line of duty killed that takes away human life, raped women and girls for defense could have been jailed and prosecuted for such crimes. Instead, these soldiers are honored as heroes of the country (The Times Literary Supplement). Some countries send soldiers to unjust wars but at long run, they are justified to fight kill and even abduct the enemy. Arbitration and violence do happen for a reason. Many times, criminals act violently people thus in many contexts violence is never an option carry on thus breaking morals and this negative belief on violence. Research carried out in California showed that many acts of violence were due to desire to do the right thing, those who commit the crime feel a right to commit it. It is true that violent attacks are because of aggression and for vengeance. According to Professor Alan Fiske of the University of California in America, some people do things to hurt others even themselves because of the belief that they have to. The moral requirement of violence is that violence is right and should be done. Professor Tage Rai of the northwest university argues that “killing and physical attack are committed for vengeance of wrongs both real and the perceived attacks.” Violence is perceived as a way of instilling obedience and to correct a relationship gone sour (The Times Literary Supplement). Immorality is a root cause of evil socially and politically. Violence is immoral, but politically it is justifiable, violence for self-defense. When a person initiates violence and argument fails, violence is justified for the defense of property and life. The government has an obligation to defend the citizens; through violence, they are able to punish the perpetrators. Most governments are granted a monopoly to use violence to ensure order prevails and to avoid oppression of the weak by the strong in the society. It is true that government use of force will never exceed the private entity using force, the united nations have an obligation to ensure excessive violence is never subjected to the public. Violence is also terror and in the current situation “war on terror”. This “war on terror” is fought and defended in equal measures by world leaders. Terror according to “moral clarity” is morally equal to war, rebellion by a group of fanatics whom negotiation or dialogue is unfruitful; therefore, terrorism should never be rejected. Terrorism work according to reason, circumstances surrounding it and the consequences of rejecting it must be put into considerations before rejecting it. Terrorism is a political and moral discussion especially in the west, it is a confusing subject filled with political passion and moral emotions, and it is filled with relativism and double standards (The Times Literary Supplement). This has led to moral choice and deliberation. Terrorism as a form of violence, it instills fear and terror to innocent civilians, government officials, and military personnel. Many nations especially the Muslims have successfully used terror to get what they want from the larger Christian nations. They instill fear and terror to Christian nations and governments to act in favor of their proposals. To my conclusion, arguments work better and are morally right given a situation a person or a nation is in. Therefore, if a person or a nation chooses violence, it should not be intimidated instead the circumstances are to be observed that led to the choice. Since argumentation involves individual and an opponent who can engage in dialogue trying to reach a consensus, it can only work best in a peaceful environment. In a situation where one party is using right argument while another is hostile, violence is the way to go. This is the reason I end by saying, violence is morally right, and argumentation is morally right. Work Cited The Times Literary Supplement. 'VIOLENCE AND THE USE OF VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY.' The Ecumenical Review 25.4 (1973): 455-467. Web. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1701196-consensus-between-violence-and-argument
(Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1701196-consensus-between-violence-and-argument.
“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1701196-consensus-between-violence-and-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Consensus Between Violence And Argument

Relation between Rap Music and Violence

Some people believe that rap music can create violent character and attitudes among teenagers while others strongly oppose this argument.... An essay examining the idea that Rap music (and their video) promotes violence.... Findings of different studies again failed to reach a consensus in concluding whether rap music inject violence or not.... “After studying 522 black girls between the ages of 14 and 18 from non- urban, lower socioeconomic neighborhoods, researchers found that compared to those who never or rarely watched these videos, the girls who viewed these gangsta videos for at least 14 hours per week were far more likely to practice numerous destructive behaviors....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Coercive Interrogation Analysis

law have hidden ambiguities and exceptions, which in turn create space for argument and manipulation – and for lawful torture.... Because of the strict observance of such protections without exception, the ability of the law to constrain state violence is severely limited.... Most significant is the idea of necessity as a criminal defense and a justification for state violence”.... It is thus that some forms of state violence are prohibited by law; but the law also allows for exceptions that permit the limited or justified use of violence....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

13sp2 Rebuttal Argument

Furthermore, the Constitution entitles the authority to declare war or allowed an act of violence against a defined enemy, and for no other reasons, the CIA and other related agencies know exactly who the enemies are.... Second, the Constitution itself entitles the state to use acts of violence to a defined enemy, especially which they are threats to the national security.... There are a lot of differences between an American transgressor who commits a crime of theft and robbery compared to any Al Qaeda member who brutally killed thousands of people all over the world, or helped suicide bombing and hijacking to be possible....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Carter-Reagan-Bush: The Bipartisan Consensus

It is evidently clear from the discussion that after the war in Vietnam, the country faced the Watergate scandals that led individuals to be insecurity, family disarray, environmental deterioration, and a growing culture of violence.... This research is being carried out to evaluate and present how Governments have moved from Republicans to Democrats again and again but no party has been capable of going beyond the vision of eliminating cases of poverty, and wars in the State....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Progress in Communication Facilitated Criminals in a Way that is Astounding for Them

Many times, crime is aggravated by those people who defend their gun ownership as a means of resisting violence and ensuring safety.... Gun control legislation prohibit the private possession of fire arms and see this tendency of the general populace towards weapons as an absolute pointless behavior that is reflective of psychological satisfaction in some cases, but potently capable of domestic violence and illicit smuggling.... This happens for a number of reasons, the most important of which is domestic violence....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Gun Rights in the United States

This is at first a counterintuitive argument but one she provides serious and convincing evidence for.... The paper "Gun Rights in the United States" highlights that America needs a careful and considerate policy towards guns which does everything possible to keep them out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Media Is Not to Blame for Violence in the Society

This paper 'The Media Is Not to Blame for violence in the Society" focuses on the fact that there is no denying that violence directed towards children by their peers is a painful thing.... In the natural, it might be hard to comprehend gun violence, trauma, or mental sickness.... nbsp; If poverty, drug/alcohol use, patterns of physical & emotional abuse and access to weapons are the biggest causes of violence in the society, then it is unreasonable for the government to try and regulate the media content that children watch since this does not stop children from being violent....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Ideal Speech Situation Issues

Ideal speech situation refers to the situation whereby the dialogue is uncoerced and free whereby there is no existence of any other force, but the better argument.... It is apparent from the argument of Habermas that it is possible to test all presuppositions that are connected to all arguments and this is done through some performance contradiction where people tries to contradict the speaker's conversation by arguing if it could be done in another way and trying to see the outcome of changing one's argumentation....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us