StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Right to Strike in the Public Sector - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the paper 'The Right to Strike in the Public Sector' states that there is no possible alternative to collective bargaining even in the public sector and that enhancing the bargaining process promises the greatest possibility to discourage strikes against the interest of the general public…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
The Right to Strike in the Public Sector
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Right to Strike in the Public Sector"

The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Introduction The right to strike is a key doctrine in private organizations. It works as the foundation for collective bargaining and pushes compromise between the parties involved. This right bestows a considerable level of power on private workers’ unions and encourages them to address important issues like job security, benefits, and wage. This same power is not granted to public servants or government employees. The federal government criminalizes strikes perpetrated by public servants (Cihon & Castagnera 590). Even those states that acknowledge the right to strike of government employees forbid firefighters and police from participating in a strike, including other employees they consider important (Slater 81). So the question is, should public servants have the right to strike? Overview of the Debate Some argues that public employees should have the right to strike. They argue that as long as private sector employees have the right to strike, public servants should also be granted the same right, except if they are in a rigid ‘governmental’ job like supervising the military or similar duties (Slater 95). Because most public workers’ unions do not have the right to strike, they have a tendency to concentrate on more specific, more ordinary matters. Without the right to strike, not having the power to negotiate job security or pay, they have to look for other matters to make themselves heard and to stimulate the labor force. Thus, many will try to represent even the most terrible employee and bargain on even slight amendments in policy so they can keep an important position within the bargaining body (Marx 101). Basically, advocates of public strikes argue that public servants should have the power to exercise the same methods available to private employees, for they have a similar stake in enhancing working conditions and wages. On the other hand, critics of public strikes frequently argue that public servants should not have the right to strike because the government provides important services which should not be disrupted, and that strikes must not be allowed against a sovereign entity (Marx 99). Services provided by the government have usually been deemed necessary. As proclaimed by Governor Calvin Coolidge in 1919, “There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, at any time” (Riccucci 326). Moreover, opponents of public strike argue that, theoretically, strikes against a sovereign entity are not likely, because agents of that government cannot share power with workforce representatives. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt provided an explanation of this argument (Riccucci 261): The very nature and purposes of government make it impossible for administration officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people who speak by laws enacted by their representative in Congress. Accordingly, administration officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many cases restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters. Those opposed to stoppages point out that the strike, as an economic weapon, is inapplicable since government will not be put out of business, nor will it use a tactic such as the lockout… Given these strong, compelling arguments from both sides of the debate, should public servants then have the right to strike? This essay argues that public servants should not have the right to strike. This argument has been well supported and clearly justified by Franklin D. Roosevelt: “A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable” (Slater 87). Forbidding public strikes should be justifiable if alternative ways are available to guarantee a just and impartial handling of employee demands. It is widely known from experience that providing an alternative to strike is the strategy effectively carried out in other circumstances where in the boycott process of negotiating issues led to unfavorable outcomes (Slater 87-89). Interestingly though, it was the unions of the earlier period which became disappointed of the strike as a way of negotiating issues with employers. Why public servants should not have the right to strike? The valid reason for upholding the legal prohibition on public strikes is situated within the essence of government as the representative of all citizens. It is not a structured commercial or business-related entity; it cannot shut down; it cannot expel its workers. The traditional view of strikes as assessments of strength, where in the demands of the market work to limit both union and management, basically does not hold true (Cihon & Castagnera 587); therefore, a public strike becomes an obstruction of the political system, an attempt by a particular group to exploit its power over a particular service as a mechanism with which to pressure the whole community to give in. According to Marx (1969), these methods are worrying enough when they are focused on attacks on the public reserves and pressuring the rerouting of resources allotted for health, housing, education, and other inadequately subsidized civic functions. However, strikes in government departments are ever more oriented toward forcing the community to give in to what unions believe they should do with regard to public policy. In several other domains civil service employees are transforming the strike into economic and political ammunition. When New York proclaimed that it was planning to hand over its public hospitals to more capable voluntary agencies, it confronted a union threat to close down every hospital if the plan proceeded. Even the Fraternal Order of Police, a leader of law and order, has confronted a national strike to stage “the need for more public support of law enforcers” (Marx 164). Justifiable as numerous of the suggested policy reforms maybe, issues of this sort should not be tackled under the pressure of a strike; if not, political representatives will become slaves of disgruntled public servants, acting in response to force, not influence or persuasion. It is possible to work out a public employment relations policy that is effective, a policy that will prohibit strikes that harm the interest of the public while providing fair treatment to government workers. Through this step the government can formulate methods that are sensitive to the ever evolving circumstances and nature of labor relations. Above all, it must differentiate between terms of employment established by the government and those which by appointment or traditional policy fall into the domain specified by the law as appropriate for collective bargaining. The law can confirm the doctrine that there can be no collective negotiations with the state assembly (Riccucci 272). It is not prepared to negotiate over the conditions of legislation with any particular group. Its duty as the representative for all citizens should be protected and its procedure should be summoned only by political petition, not by the demands of suspended services. Because it is impossible to truly bargain on those employment terms established by the state legislature, it is also not possible to have a legal strike in such circumstances. This is currently the case for particular categories of civil service workers, including correctional officials, hospital employees, clerks, and stenographers, where it is supposed that state-wide wage standardization is advantageous (Marx 165-166). However, wherever power can possibly be appointed, a representative should be delegated with whom the worker can negotiate over those provisions comprised in the delegation. Where the government has delegated a representative with power to bargain with the workers, the state should follow a path of promoting collective bargaining in agreement with the public interest. By adopting this measure the state strengthens the flexibility needed in a domain quite dominated by human aspects. The state should also focus on building an environment more favorable to successful negotiation and in this manner the government better guarantee that court mandates and legal bans will be conformed to when they are given or implemented (Slater 133). This process calls for a recognition of the fact that collective bargaining relies on the strike’s opportunity or outcome; that the state then focuses on enhancing the bargaining practices and the ability of all the involved parties rather than embedding deceptive and burdensome processes onto the system. Ultimately, where all other alternatives were unsuccessful in resolving the conflict, the government should be ready to function when legal strikes took place. However, the government should not be an involved party in the bargaining process. The appropriate function of the legislature is to look for the ideal measures to resolve the conflict including the odds of consulting the issue to the highest arbitration agency as an ultimate resort (Marx 144-145). It therefore has the duty to present the particular issue that will be handed over to the third-party arbitrator (Marx 145). At every phase of the conflict the parties must be persuaded to resolve the conflict themselves by compromise or by handing over some or all of the issues willingly to arbitration. Conclusions Based on the discussion, there is no possible alternative to collective bargaining even in the public sector and that enhancing the bargaining process promises the greatest possibility to discourage strikes against the interest of the general public. The way to prevent public strikes rests in the improvement of the process of bargaining, not by finding an alternative to it. With skilled and reliable negotiations, no external entity, no mechanism, and no rigid guidelines are needed to resolve conflicts. For that reason, public servants do not need the right to strike. Works Cited Cihon, Patrick & James Castagnera. Employment & Labor Law. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2010. Print. Marx, Herbert Jr. Collective Bargaining for Public Employees. New York: Wilson, 1969. Print. Riccucci, Norma. Public Personnel Administration and Labor Relations. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2007. Print. Slater, Joseph. Public Workers: Government Employee Unions, the Law, and the State, 1900-1962. New York: Cornell University Press, 2004. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Term Paper, n.d.)
The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1798762-should-public-servantslike-school-teachershospital-workerstrash-collectors-have-the-right-to-strike
(The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Term Paper)
The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1798762-should-public-servantslike-school-teachershospital-workerstrash-collectors-have-the-right-to-strike.
“The Right to Strike in the Public Sector Term Paper”. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1798762-should-public-servantslike-school-teachershospital-workerstrash-collectors-have-the-right-to-strike.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Right to Strike in the Public Sector

How land, labor, and capital were the building blocks of the US economy

The quality of workforce in the private sector has increased but the same cannot be said about the government offices.... In terms of industry, most jobs are being created in the services sector with manufacturing sector actually losing jobs.... In terms of the manufacturing sector the Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) performs research and development activities to improve the efficiency of the manufacturing sector....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Differences between Private and Public Sectors

That is, in the public sector they have to involve a variety of government officials in collective bargaining on the firm and the individuals must have authority in a particular issue while in the private sector they have to involve the government to intervene and asses the situation and from that point a collective bargaining can start.... The third difference between public and private sector in term of strike is that in the public sector, strikes are illegal....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Labor Unions in the United States

Now labor unions comprise only small part of American workers and only some part of those workers are the employees occupied in private sector.... It is well known that there… They became a very important public means of the regulation of social relationship and marked the progress of mankind. During last decades the American labor unions have been confronted with a lot In the middle of the last century labor unions included almost half of the working population....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Employer and Union Campaigning Process

asically, we have a tendency to relate unions for public sector companies wherein every company there are thousands of workers and unions are formed independently for each one of them.... The essay 'Employer and Union Campaigning Process' is devoted to the issue of separation of relationships and mutual understanding between employer and employee....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Place Your Vote

Threats of inflation were being envisaged at the time and these tended to spill over to the housing sector and the credit markets (Schoen, 2008).... This essay "Place Your Vote" is meant to give a glimpse of how far the American voting space enjoyed by all Americans came from The writer focuses on how the issue of oil and gasoline prices upon to decide who to vote for in the forthcoming elections....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Management in context

ccording to the article, those who can join unions are employees in either the private sector or the public sector.... Why are employees of the public sector organizations more likely to engage in industrial actions?... ublic sector employees are more likely to engage in industrial actions because they enjoy a lot of job security compared to those in the private sector.... They are not under any risk of job loss even when they go on strike or other industrial actions....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

School Law and Public Policy

In specific, the paper will present a comparison and contrast of the options including strike by the educators or political action course to get representation in the process of policymaking.... In order to backup the comparison, references will be taken from legal clauses, past literature, The purpose of this section of the paper includes a number of past cases where educators have either used the method of strike or political action course to make sure that their representation is taken under consideration....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Collective Bargaining and Pay Inequity in the Public Sector

Even without the legal rights to organise, their still existed unions in the public sector as early as before 1960.... A lot of improvement has been noted Collective Bargaining agreements and Pay Inequality in the public sector.... Even without the legal rights to organise, their still existed unions in the public sector as early as before 1960.... States must therefore fully recognise the need for collective bargaining agreements and respond by passing legislations that do not encourage pay inequality in the public sector....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us