StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument" paper examines the article on Agile Modelling and Extreme Programming written by Scott W. Ambler in 2010. The article relates to software development methodologies, which include Agile Modelling (AM) and Extreme Programming (XP)…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument"

This paper examines the article on Agile Modelling and Extreme Programming written by Scott W. Ambler in The article relates to software development methodologies, which include: Agile Modelling (AM) and Extreme Programming (XP), and explains how Agile Modelling can be applied to an Extreme Programming by starting from the misconceptions among the people regarding the AM. The paper presents a rationale on whether the article’s reasoning is deductive or inductive, as well as it highlights and discusses the fallacies made by the writer of the article. Ground Rules The referred article provides either deductive reasoning or inductive reasoning; therefore, it would be relevant within the framework of this research to explain both of the terms first. As per the course text, in the deductive reasoning the writer concludes the article’s result from a set of assertions or premises and if the premises relationship is valid, then the conclusion must also be correct (Maimon, Peritz, & Yancey, 2009). Moreover, in the deductive reasoning article, the writer explains the topic generically and moves towards the conclusion more specifically to achieve his results. On the other hand, in the inductive reasoning the writer does not state that the given arguments are true rather, if the facts, statistics, expert opinion etc. are true the results can be valid. Moreover, the in the inductive reasoning article, the approach used by the writer is bottom-up, means that the author explains the specific observation and moves towards the conclusion by providing generalizations and theories (Trochim, 2006). Now on the basis of these explanations, the document examines the referred article of the Ambler to determine either it provides deductive reasoning or inductive reasoning. In order to determine the type of reasoning of the article and analyzing the arguments provided by the author, a method has been explained in the course text known as Toulmin. In the method, the writer explained that there are three facets of a sentence include: claim, grounds and warrant. Claims are the assertions provided by the writer regarding the topic, the grounds are the reasons and evidences for his conclusion and the warrants are the relationship between the grounds and claims on the basis of hypothesis or principals. In this way, the arguments and statements of the Ambler’s article can be analyzed and examined to know the article’s strengths and weaknesses. Moreover, by applying the method of Toulmin, the paper classifies the fallacies made by the Ambler in the article of Agile Methodology and Extreme Programming. Whereas, a fallacy is a statement in which the premises provided by the writer for the results do not offer the required level of support. Modelling the Argument It is appropriate to examine whether the arguments provided by the Amber in the form of premises that lead to the logic conclusion or the conclusion is supported by a number of anecdotes. In the first case, only one fallacy in the article would be enough to negate the entire argument, on the other hand in the second case, it is necessary to examine all the grounds and warrants of the arguments made by the Ambler. The first heading “Setting the Record Straight” of the Ambler’s article put forth a claim according to which “there are several common misconceptions that people seem to have regarding modelling on an XP project”, to be precise there are three “most common misconceptions”. However, the next four paragraphs/bullet points give the reasons for the claim, whereas, the remaining upcoming arguments provide grounds and warrants that need to be examined keeping in view the ground rules. Article Analysis In the opening paragraph of the article, the author introduces the Agile Modelling and Extreme Programming. In the first heading the author claims that there are some misconceptions regarding Agile Modelling, and explains the grounds of misconceptions, and provides justifications and warrants in the arguments. As the writer used the word of ‘people’ without any further specifications, therefore, it has been assumed that the author talked about all the software engineers of beginner, intermediate and expert level. The writer started with general conceptions regarding the topic and moved further, therefore, it can be said that the arguments made by the Ambler is deductive. After providing the reasoning and correcting the misconceptions, the writer wrote towards the actual topic of how AM could be employed over the XP. The grounds used by the writer that ‘Modelling is the Part of the Extreme Programming’, there is always a process of documentation in the Extreme Programming, and how Unified Modern Language can be used in the Extreme Programming. In the first ground the Ambler explains the process of the Extreme Programming that the “User stories are a fundamental aspect of XP and artefacts such as Class Responsibility Collaborator (CRC) cards are common to XP efforts.” These are the facts used by the writer to prove his results, this is the inductive reasoning. However, the same process is used by the writer for the next ground. However, in the last ground, the writer referred to the other article, the expert opinion. This also supports that the arguments are inductive. In the heading point 2, the writer mentioned the practices of the Agile Modelling and how they can be applicable for the XP project. The writer provided the facts on which it can be said that the Agile Modelling can be used in the XP projects, this is another example of the inductive reasoning. Further, the writer developed a test bed and tested his opinions by the process of ‘Refactoring’. This is a sub-premise and a sub-conclusion, it can be said that this is a fallacy made by the writer of the article. The writer made a claim by mentioning ‘Which AM Practices to Adopt’, in the claim the writer has not provided any grounds and warrants. The writer concluded the article that the AM practices can be employed to the XP project and provided guidelines. In my opinion, it can be said that the article is a mixture of deductive and inductive reasoning; however, mostly the writer used the inductive reasoning except the structure of the document as provided by the Trochim in 2006. Moreover, mostly the writer provided the correct facts substantiated by warrants to validate his claim, however, in some cases there are fallacies arguments as well. References Maimon, E. P., Peritz, J. H., & Yancey, K. B. (2010). A writers resource: a handbook for writing and research. New York: McGraw-Hill. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Trochim, W. (2006). Deduction and induction. Retrieved from: http://socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php Ambler, Scott W. (2012). Agile modelling and extreme programming. Retrieved from: http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileModelingXP.htm Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument Essay - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1603495-thinking-critically-analyzing-an-argument
(Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument Essay - 1)
Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument Essay - 1. https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1603495-thinking-critically-analyzing-an-argument.
“Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1603495-thinking-critically-analyzing-an-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Thinking Critically: Analyzing an Argument

When work comes home; Coping Strategies of Teleworkers and their Families

The research is based on the information gathered from 25 teleworkers and the way they manage their work and domestic situations.... The research was divided into case studies to demonstrate different situations faced by these individual and a conclusion was drawn from the evidence presented in the case studies....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Critical Thinking

“Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.... du) Hence, critical thinking is extremely helpful in analyzing different situations, establishing propositions, developing hypotheses, articulating theoretical frameworks and making future plans in the light of information obtained through various channels....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Critical Thinking Is Important to Mankind

(McGraw-Hill, 2000) However, it is always better to state all the premises expressly in an argument.... If all the premises are true, the conclusion in a deductive argument has to be true.... We can say that the conclusion is already implicitly contained in the premises in the case of a deductive argument.... A deductive argument is either valid or not valid; there is no intermediate state.... These are facts or assumptions that are necessary for the argument to be valid but are not expressly stated....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Growth Learning and Development

Whenever I'll study, I'll always try to collaborate with other students, because learning enhances critical thinking skills (Gokhale, 1995).... Collaborating with other students or group studying encourages debates and arguments and that is the fuel of critical thinking.... There are plenty of critical thinking blogs available online, I would love to join them, comment on their posts and would love to write a paper, observation, theory or anything along those lines to make sure that I am actively participating; passively listening to the lectures is not....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

A Concise Introduction to Logic

art B Five characteristics of critical thinking in movie 12 are argument analysis, morality such as persuasion and obedience, manipulation, fallacies versus sound reasoning and corresponding effective Critical thinker (Patrick, 156-198).... I would want argument analysis on the prevailing jury in case I was the defendant.... argument analysis method normally cast criticisms on the underlying second point and subsequent points via thoroughly analyzing every component section....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Critical Thinking as The Intellectual and Disciplined Process

In itself, critical thinking refers to a mode of thinking on a subject, a problem or content in which the thinker makes improvement on the quality of his reasoning or thinking through the use of skillful analysis, assessment and reconstruction of the thinking process.... Other… cteristics that are consistent with critical thinking are evaluation of the information that has been gathered, reflection, communication, reasoning, application and analysis, among others....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Critical Thinking Process

This argument is valid, because it guarantees its conclusion thereafter.... Critical thinking is an intellectual procedure of skilfully and actively conceptualizing analyzing applying or evaluating and synthesizing information collected or gathered by the five senses through experience, observation, reasoning, reflection or communication as guidance… Critical thinking requires the ability to recognize and solve problems, and prioritize options based on situation and parties involved....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Bloom's Taxonomy

One the other hand, Critical Thinking can be described as "the intellectually disciplined process of… ly and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generalized by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning or communication, as a guide to belief or action [or argument]" (Scriven & Paul, 2001, p.... One the other hand, Critical Thinking can be described as "the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generalized by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning or communication, as a guide to belief or action [or argument]" (Scriven & Paul, 2001, p....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us