StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This case study "Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua" discusses Nicaragua's Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (FSLN) that overthrew the Somoza dictatorship and formed the Sandinista Junta of National Reconstruction government in Nicaragua…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua"

CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED S OF AMERICA) In July 1979 Nicaraguas Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (FSLN) overthrew the Somoza dictatorship and formed the Sandinista Junta of National Reconstruction government in Nicaragua. The United States was opposed to the Sandinista (the Somozas had been American clients) and actively supported the Contra resistance against the new government. While Congress wavered in its support throughout the 1980s Ronald Reagans White House provided covert aid through the Argentine government and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Eventually even Iran and Israel become involved in the scheme resulting in the Iran-Contra scandal that erupted in November 1986 and made Colonel Oliver North a household name. When the Iran-Contra scheme developed into a political scandal the United States the United States was already dealing with a negative ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), widely known as the World Court, condemning the countys involvement in the paramilitary struggle against the Nicaraguan government. The Court also condemned the United States for mining several Nicaraguan harbors in the early spring of 1984 to undermine the ability of the Sandinista government to resist the insurgents. (Sklar, 1988, 164) The following discussion will focus on the International Court of Justice judgment delivered in July 1986, the “Case Concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America. The judgment and justifications will be briefly summarized and assessed. First, the court considered questions of jurisdiction and admissibility. The United States argued that Nicaragua was not a party to the agreements establishing the World Court. They also argued that the regional negotiations known as the Contadora process made the intervention of the World Court unnecessary and that even if the Contadora process did not preempt World Court intervention the dispute was in the jurisdiction of the United Nations Security Council alone. The World Court dismissed these arguments and ruled that Nicaraguas application could and would be heard by the World Court. (Overview, 1986, p. 54-56) All of these procedural issues were decided by large majorities of the fifteen justices. (From thirteen to two, to unanimity.) Nicaraguas application to the court involved two allegations of American actions and two alleged outcomes of those actions, all of which Nicaragua asserted to be illegal in the context of the World Court. First and most straightforward, was Nicaraguas allegation that the United States had placed anti-shipping mines in the maritime approaches to Nicaragua and the harbors of Nicaragua. The facts in the case were relatively straightforward. Between January and April, 1984 the United States directly and through proxies mined harbors on both coasts of Nicaragua. A top secret memo written by Colonel Oliver North and Constantine Menges, both involved in the operation, detailed the mining operations and their objectives: On the night of February 29, [U.S. NAVY SEALS] emplaced four magnetic mines in the harbor at Corinto, Nicaragua.... ARDEs "Barracuda Commandos" took credit for the operation.... Our intention is to severely disrupt the flow of shipping essential to Nicaraguan trade during the peak export period. [ CENSORED ] In this case, our objective is to further impair the already critical fuel capacity in Nicaragua. (North and Menges, 1984) The United States Congress became aware of American involvement in this operation and condemned it. The facts of this part of Nicaragua are straightforward and simple, U.S. documents confirm that the U.S. Participated in the placement of explosive anti-shipping mines with Nicaraguas twelve mile maritime limit and in Nicaraguan harbors. Therefore it is not surprising that the World Court ruled in favor of Nicaragua by a majority of twelve to three: By laying mines in the internal or territorial waters of the Republic of Nicaragua during the first months of 1984, the United States of America has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligations under customary international law not to use force against another State, not to intervene in its affairs, not to violate its sovereignty and not to interrupt peaceful maritime commerce. (International Court of Justice. (July 1986). CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=367&code=nus&p1=3&p2=3&case=70&k=66&p3=5.) The second part of the Nicaraguan case was sightly more complicated. It alleged that the United States, directly and indirectly, supported the military activities of the mercenaries and paramilitary forces that were actively attempting to overthrow the Sandinista government of the FSLN in Nicaragua. However, before the World Court ruled in 1986 reports of the links between the Contras and the United Sates were appearing in the American media. (Chamora and Morley, 1985) Edgar Chamorro served as a director of the anti-Sandinista rebel organization, the Nicaraguan Democratic Force, from 1982 to 1984. In “Confessions of a Contra” (published before the World Courts 1986 ruling) he detailed the links between the Contras and the U.S. government. In November 1982 he had a meeting with CIA operatives and states that when he left that meeting, “I was glad to see that the Americans were committed enough to our cause to be taking such an active role, and I was flattered as well.” H also states that the purpose of the meeting was to present a popular front of widely accepted opponents to the FSLN government to prevent Congress passing the Boland Amendment from stopping U.S. military aid to the Contras. Thus, this article makes it clear that the United States government was supporting the Contras and was taking action to ensure that that support would not be stopped by the Congress. This article and similar media reports appeared before the World Court ruled in the summer of 1986. Therefore, it is not surprising that again, the World Court ruled in favor of Nicaragua and decided that he United States was supporting the Contras directly and indirectly, and militarily and by other means. The Iran-Contra scandal eventually revealed the extent to which the United States was doing so and how far it was willing to go to prevent the Congress, the American public and world opinion from appreciating the links between the Contras and the American government. Implicitly the World Court ruling on the mining operations and support for the Congress meant that American actions also violated two sections of Chapter 1, Article 2 of the United Nations Charter: All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations. (Charter of the United Nations, http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml.) The United States did not use peaceful means, they endangered international peace and security, and justice. Also, they used both the threat of force and force against the Nicaraguan government. Evidence that these actions were directed toward overthrowing the Sandinista government and allowing the Contras to take power speak to motive. In legal terms it is easier to try to prove that a factual issue is or is not true—was the U.S. involved in mining Nicaraguan harbors and did it support the Contras—than it is to try to prove that the mining was an attempt to overthrow the Nicaraguan government and interfere in its sovereignty and right of self determination. However, again, the evidence was overwhelmingly supportive of the Nicaraguan case. The publicly stated and oft repeated purpose of the Contras was to overthrow and replace the FSLN government in power in Nicaragua. (Chamora and Morley, 1985). Second, the North/Menges memorandum quoted above stated, “our intention is to severely disrupt the flow of shipping essential to Nicaraguan trade” and, our objective is to further impair the already critical fuel capacity in Nicaragua.” (North and Menges, 1984) Evidence of this nature clearly established the purpose of he American actions and the motives underlying them. The mining was intended to disrupt the Nicaraguan economy and undermine the Sandinista ability to resist the military activities of the Contras. The support of the Contras with both money and military equipment was designed to strengthen their ability to overthrow the Sandinista government. Both of these motives speak to a desire to interfere in the sovereignty of Nicaragua and overthrow the government. For these reasons the World Court ruled that the Untied States had attempted to overthrow the legitimate government of Nicaragua, a sovereign state. References Chamora, Edgar and Jefferson Morley. (August 1985). Confessions of a Contra. The New Republic. http://www.tnr.com/article/confessions-contra. International Court of Justice. (July 1986). CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=367&code=nus&p1=3&p2=3&case=70&k=66&p3=5. International Court of Justice. (July 1986). CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA): OVERVIEW. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=66&PHPSESSID=05fad554ae9feec6f32e8fcea282db53&case=70&code=nus&p3=4. International Court of Justice. (July 1986). CASE CONCERNING THE MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA):PRESS RELEASE. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/70/9973.pdf. Maier, Harold G. (January 1987). Appraisals Of The ICJs Decision: Nicaragua V. United States (Merits). The American Society of International Law 81: 77. 81 A.J.I.L. 77. http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/57749.html. North, Oliver North and Constantine Menges. ( March 1984). “Special Operations in Nicaragua”. http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/04/315106.shtml. Sklar, Holly. Washingtons War on Nicaragua. Boston: South End Press, 1988. United Nations. Charter of the United Nations, Chapter 1: Purposes and Principles. http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/military/1744935-nicaragua-case
(Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/military/1744935-nicaragua-case.
“Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/military/1744935-nicaragua-case.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua

Reflective Response on Gioconda Belli and Slavenka Drakulic books

Belli grew up in a high class Nicaraguan family and her entire family was very unsympathetic towards the Somoza dictatorship that reigned at the time, in nicaragua.... At the same time, Belli was able to give a very personal and first hand stance as to the experiences she had and the times she went through under the totalitarian regime that reigned in nicaragua during the course of her growing up.... She writes about how she made arguments with Castro and his regime, and contributed to representations at Third World conferences in order to liberate nicaragua....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy

Reagan claimed that most people did not understand the functioning of nicaragua, as they only knew it as a Marxist country but many were not for the idea of exchange of money and weapons and this made it difficult for the U.... After Reagan's election in the year 1981, he decided to support the resistance revolutions in countries like Angola, nicaragua, Afghanistan and Cambodia.... for example that was practiced in nicaragua led to the decimation of its economy....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Paramilitary Structure: A Critical Review

When discussing the paramilitary structure used by contemporary American police agencies, there are many factors which must be considered.... The origins, evolution, and influence of the paramilitary structure itself are of critical importance, as well as the impact that this organizational structure has on organizational culture, the role the paramilitary structure plays in the defining and delivering of police services to the community, and how this structure affects communication with the public and their contemporary goals of policing....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Supremacy of the United States of America Above All the International Law: The Nicaragua Case

the military and support from the Italian government.... the military and support from the Italian government.... Author of the essay "The Supremacy of the United States of America Above All the International Law: The nicaragua Case" will investigate whether did the US violate the principles of international law with its actions in the case of the government transition process in the Republic of nicaragua.... In the nicaragua case, the aspect of the right of self-defense has clearly been explained....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Nicaragua's vampire problem

The people are too poor to afford mosquito… The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry sent two of its vampire hunters to the community of nicaragua to clean the colony of the bats.... They managed to catch one baby vampire Nicaraguas Vampire Problem Tim Rogers in his article Nicaraguas Vampire Problem raises the issue of the vampire bats in the town of nicaragua.... The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry sent two of its vampire hunters to the community of nicaragua to clean the colony of the bats....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Arguments in Favor of the United Kingdom in the Serbia and Montenegro v UK Case

ReferencesCase Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.... However, as explained by an Air Commodore during an interview, despite the careful pre-attack planning, the law of statistics would, at some stage, go against them and they would be exposed to technical defect.... Article 51 of the UN Charter states that: Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Sandinistas, Civil War in Nicaragua

The given work will analyze… When Sandinistas captured the power in nicaragua with their national development program, the tension between Sandinistas and the business community, the representatives of which In 1981 the U.... Government suspended the economic help for nicaragua under the pretext that Salvadorian insurgents received weapon from Cuba through nicaragua.... The given paper will try to reveal what was brought by contras to nicaragua: freedom or evil....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Case Study: Latin America and the Catholic Church

The The 1983 Visit of Pope John Paul II to nicaragua Affiliation Introduction Pope John Paul II had a pastoral visit to nicaragua in March 1983.... In his visit, the pope made it clear that the unity of the Church unity was the best significant way to prevent nicaragua from being corrupted through “godless communism”.... The Pope spoke out against the increasing division within the Church (Mannion, 2008).... Following the reaction of priests to the Pope's comments, most Christians believed that the incidence would stir up opposition against the Pope, and the ripple effect be further division in the Church....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us