StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Plantigas Claim About Belief in God - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The focus of the paper "Plantiga’s Claim About Belief in God " is on the philosophy divulged by Plantinga, the need of finding a conjoint between the classical and traditional philosophical views, different philosophical style, the matter about having belief in the existence of God…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
Plantigas Claim About Belief in God
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Plantigas Claim About Belief in God"

Plantinga Claim about Belief in God Plantiga’s Claim about Belief in God Introduction The rationality of belief in God is avery convoluted and profound issue that has been discussed and explained by the philosophers in so many different ways. From time to time different philosophers have propositioned different thoughts and argument claiming the rationality about the belief in God (Oppy and Scott, 2010). The philosophers belonging to the classical and traditional schools of thoughts have explained in detail their arguments about the existence of God and the rationality of individual’s belief in it. These thoughts are accepted as well as criticized by other philosophers contributing towards long and endless debates about belief in God and its rationality. American analytical philosopher Alvin Carl Plantinga has also added some new dimensions to thoughts about rationality of belief in God by proposing the argument that belief in God is properly basic and needs to justification and evidenced from the other beliefs (Attridge, 2009). Plantinga’s Claim Plantinga divulged his philosophical views regarding belief in God and proposed his claim that the belief in God used to be properly basic depending upon the circumstances being faced by the individuals. He argues that there are certain circumstance when the belief in God in properly basic because certain circumstances compel the individuals to build faith upon certain things about God even if they do not find any support and reasons for those things from their other existing beliefs (Oppy and Scott, 2010). Plantinga referred to the classical thought that asserts that belief in God is always held in connection with other beliefs. He opposed this classical thought about the dependency of belief in God upon some evidences from other beliefs and claims that it is not always necessary because people do believe upon many things about God that are not verified and asserted by their other beliefs. He argues that believing in God does not require any argument. He made his claim in his article "Reformed Objection to Natural Theology" published in 1981. After the publication of this article there was strong wave of criticism and opposition was provoked especially from the philosophers having firm belief upon the arguments made by the classical philosophy. Through his claim and argument Plantinga has contributed to the epistemology called reformed epistemology in which he argues that the justification about the belief in God is not dependent upon evidence but it is properly basic and could be held regardless of other belief’s support to it. The argument poses by Plantinga has been regarded an unusual proposition within the sphere of Anglo-American philosophy and also criticizes and opposed by other theorists and philosophers (Attridge, 2009). Response to Plantinga’s Claim Plantinga’s argument has raised several questions regarding the rationality of belief in the existence of God. His claims initiated heated debate and the philosophers of his age widely attempted to express their views about his philosophy. The propositions of Plantinga have mainly provoked opposition and criticism and many philosophers (e.g. Goetz, 1983; Robbins, 1983; Gilman, 1988) and they have identified some contradictions and flaws in his claims and thoughts. For instance a professor of theology at Saint Bonaventure University Apczynski (1992) believes that Plantinga has attempted to represent non-conventional connection of Christian philosophy to the reality whereas some theorists also regard his claim as a different understanding of nature of religious belief (Goetz, 1983, p475) Plantinga contradicts the traditional thought about religion that assumes that religious beliefs necessarily need justification weather known or unknown. His non-conventional through provoked the idea that one do not have faith upon the existence of God as a conclusion of the other things upon which he has belief but he accept God existence as basic and this belief should be taken as part of bedrock of his noetic structure. It implies that one accepts the belief in God as basic and do not look for justification of this belief. Goetz (1983, p476), professor at the University of Notre Dame opposes the argument posed by Plantinga and put forward his stance that belief in God ought not to be considered basic on the structure of the epistemology of a person because this belief is inferred and used to base upon the basic propositions and beliefs held by a person. Goetz stresses upon the thought that inference is essential for belief in God and thus belief in God could not be properly basic. He believes that there must be some evidences affirmed by the existing beliefs to hint towards the existence of God and in the absence of such evidences it is not practically possible to have rational belief in the existence of God. Langtry (1989, p143) from the Department of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne also believes that Plantinga has offered a partial answer to the question about rationality of belief in God and his partial account seems to be fail because it does not clearly demonstrate the theory of properly basic that needs to be clearly understood in this context. He believes that if there is a properly basic belief even then some circumstance could become ground to justify that belief and then the belief became dependent upon that circumstance. Gilman (1988, p143) from the Mary Baldwin College, Staunton believes that belief in God could not be regarded solely as properly basic or rational because it is indeed both properly basic and rational. He tries to find out a midway between the classical foundationalism and Plantinga views and asserts that there are certain kind of justifications required to hold belief in God thus the belief is not be regarded completely independent or dependent upon those justification. Robbins (1983, p241) from the Indiana University at South Bend regards Plantinga proposition as an unusual approach within the conventional philosophical realm and his claim are not clear enough to satisfy the traditional school of thoughts that do not accept the proposition that belief in God is properly basic. He argue that Plantinga needs to clarify his thoughts to eliminate the contradictions identified within his own philosophies because it seems that Plantinga has given up on the philosophical foundationalism and failed to align his thoughts with it. Despite this criticism and opposition, there are some philosophers that see weightage in the arguments proposed by Plantinga and stress upon the point that whatever Plantinga has claimed must be understood in detailed and should not be misunderstood. Apczynski (1992, p302) believes that Plantinga’s overall strategy ought not to be understood only in the logic of his arguments but one has to see all of his claims in the context of alternative intellectual traditions where his claims prove their worth and credibility. Though Apczynski also see the need of further clarification in the claims made by Plantinga but he coincide with his initial stance and agree that there is possibility that individuals could hold belief in God regardless of evidences and support from their other beliefs. It shows that there is a school of thought that gives importance to the claim made by Plantinga and insists the philosophers to understand the viewpoint of Plantinga and not to oppose him completely without understanding his thoughts in their real meanings. The rationality of belief in God is very complex issue and enduring debate that could not be concluded simply in some sentences. Plantinga stance that I accept God but not on the basis of other beliefs in not widely accepted and appraised because it lacks some necessary explanation and support. This preposition is not complete and sound enough to build complete faith upon it. The conclusion made by Plantinga is also contrary to the traditional thoughts and need more explanation and convincing argument to make people agree with his claim. The study of Plantinga’s claim that belief in God is properly basic reveals that there are some weak points in this claim that need further workout and explanation to invite the appreciation and acceptance from the people. It is a generally accepted thought that the belief in God often needs some justification and evidences from the existing beliefs and the general observation and philosophical structure of people also affirm the claim that there are several evidences and support from the other beliefs that make a person develop his faith and belief in the existence of God. Hence the entire discussion could be sum up with the conclusion that the belief in God ought not to be properly basic but it seems dependent upon the support and evidences from the other beliefs. The philosophy divulged by Plantinga could not be accepted as it is neither it could be completely rejected and opposed because there are some things that need further clarification and debate whereas some weaknesses and contradictions in his claims are very obvious. There is need of finding a conjoint between the classical and traditional philosophical views and Plantinga’s thought to make it acceptable for the followers of traditional schools of thought as well as for the people looking towards nonconventional and different philosophical style to define the matter about having belief in the existence of God. References Attridge, H.W. (2009). The Religion and Science Debate: Why Does It Continue? Yale University Press Apczynski, J.V. (1992). “Belief in God, Proper Basicality, and Rationality”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 60, No. 2 (Summer, 1992), pp.301-312 Gilman, J.E. (1988). “Rationality and Belief in God”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 24, No. 3 (1988), pp. 143-157 Langtry, B. (1989). “Properly Unargued Belief in God”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Dec., 1989), pp. 129-154 Robbins, J.W. (1983). “Is Beleif in God properly basic?” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 14:4, p241 Oppy, G. and Scott, M. (2010). Reading Philosophy of Religion, London: John Wiley and Sons Goetz, S.C. (1983). “Belief in God Is Not Properly Basic”, Religious Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Dec. 1983), pp. 475-484 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“How does Plantinga argue for the claim that belief in God might be Essay”, n.d.)
How does Plantinga argue for the claim that belief in God might be Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1581066-how-does-plantinga-argue-for-the-claim-that-belief-in-god-might-be-properly-basic-do-you-think-his-argument-is-good-do-you-think-that-the-conclusion-of-his-argument-is-true
(How Does Plantinga Argue for the Claim That Belief in God Might Be Essay)
How Does Plantinga Argue for the Claim That Belief in God Might Be Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1581066-how-does-plantinga-argue-for-the-claim-that-belief-in-god-might-be-properly-basic-do-you-think-his-argument-is-good-do-you-think-that-the-conclusion-of-his-argument-is-true.
“How Does Plantinga Argue for the Claim That Belief in God Might Be Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1581066-how-does-plantinga-argue-for-the-claim-that-belief-in-god-might-be-properly-basic-do-you-think-his-argument-is-good-do-you-think-that-the-conclusion-of-his-argument-is-true.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Plantigas Claim About Belief in God

The Problem of Evil

Does belief in god contribute to man's pursuit of happiness, notwithstanding the other equally issue called evil?... Where does evil fit in god's supposed good design?... imilarly, an uncritical belief in an objectivist divine providence needs to give way to the reality of evil which God uses to teach man of his existence in the world.... god exists.... But why does an omnipotent, and omniscient, and supposedly omnibenevolent god allow evil?...
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

The Darwin Natural Selection and Its Relation to Science and Religion

This is not acceptable for many of the philosophers who deeply believe in god and his creative power.... latinga is a believer of God and his opinion is that one does not need proof to believe in god.... The debate on the existence of god and origination of the materialistic world and living beings has been evolving for ages.... Our world has ever been witnessed numerous philosophers, scientists, religious leaders and theologians argue on the subject of existence or non – existence of god....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

An extended definition of belief

John Allen Paulos mentioned that people believe in god even if they are aware of the illogic and gaping holes in the arguments for God.... He has mentioned that even though he don't believe in god, he believes in love (Paulos p.... An extended definition of belief Different people have defined belief in different terms.... Another interesting fact about belief is that it is highly subjective.... The definitions of god by the Muslims and Christians would be right....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

What Is Modal Realism

And when speaking of the beginning, it also has a theological side to it, because it then analyzes the Christian belief of Origin too and how knowledge came into being.... ence, Modal Realism becomes a claim that must either be a part of that truth, which is either established by reason or by empiricism and hence is a priori posterior in their essence and existence.... Lewis makes a claim which allows us to at least think of many possible worlds where all things parallelly possible without any temper spatial relation to each other and thus if in one world President Kenny is assassinated, then in another he may have somehow been luckier and had a chance to be the president of America for another term....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

The Concept of Classical Foundationalism

The main aspect under discussion, which forms the thesis problem, is Hume's evidentialist objection to belief in god being a function of the truths within classical foundations and such truths may not be very valid and logical especially in contemporary philosophy.... Plantinga confirms that classical foundationalism exists in the proposition that,A belief is acceptable for a person if and only if it is either (i) basic (i.... lassical foundationalism is a theory and structure of knowledge that adheres to specific forms of internalism especially about providing justifications to some basic beliefs....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Alvin Plantinga and Pluralism

For instance, the Romans worshipped Jupiter as the Supreme god.... This was a supreme god of the ancient Greeks, and they referred to him as Zeus.... Religious pluralism can be seen as a policy or attitude that accepts the diversity of other religious belief systems, and their importance within the society.... In its normative nature, exclusivism is the belief that the religion of an individual is superior to the religion of other individuals (Peterson, William, Bruce and David, 22)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Free Will as a Humans Ability

The paper "Free Will as a Humans Ability" discusses that omnipotence is considered as one of the attributes of god and this attribute gives powers to god to know all and do all.... In such a case, there may not be moral consequences of the actions of god and whatever happens, may happen because it can bring greater good to mankind.... Given the degree of freedom to humans in making choices, god, therefore, cannot be omnipotent if humans have free will....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Ancient vs Modern Apologetics

The essay "Ancient vs Modern Apologetics" discusses modern apologetics that varies from the ancient one in a number of ways including the framing of arguments.... Embracing philosophy, research and scrutiny are some of the tactics the modern apologists prefer as opposed to intolerance.... hellip; The ancient apologetics relied heavily on their own understanding and the beliefs pass on....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us