StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Meaning Good and Bad According to Nietzsche - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Meaning Good and Bad According to Nietzsche" it is clear that Nietzsche’s criticism of truth and knowledge is mostly on the allegations that everything that is made comprehensible to most individuals has to be distorted and made simple. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
Meaning Good and Bad According to Nietzsche
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Meaning Good and Bad According to Nietzsche"

Insert Nietzsche starts his narrative of how the expressions ‘good’ and ‘bad’ acquired their meaning. Initially there were two types of groups “the noble, the influential, the superior, also the high-minded” plus the “low, low-mind, and working-class.” The former had the obedient grasp over the second. They had a sentiment of ruling and dominance that was warranted by the truth that they were ruling and that they had power, the feeling of being higher over the lesser the misery of distance. His thought is that it is by the misery of space that ‘good’ and ‘bad’ originally got their significance. That is, ‘good’ was linked with the superior, privileged and noble, whereas ‘bad’ was linked with the common low and working-class (Guay, 96). Nevertheless, the offspring of the low class started resenting being inferior; they started resenting being ‘bad.’ Their hatred towards the upper-class led to a “radical changing of their ideals. Meaning ‘good’ and ‘bad’ started to reverse in meaning so that now ‘good’ defined the common, poor low, and inferior, whereas ‘bad’ now was for the powerful, rich, privileged and superior. In this manner, the deprived, sick, helpless and poor became virtuous, whereas the superior, noble and wealthy became wicked (Guay, 96). This transformation of values is likely when the hatred of the lesser classes for the powerful turns out to be so huge that they get reparation just in imagining or building a diverse moral system. It is this building of a contrasting moral system that is referred by Nietzsche as the slave morality. Thus, so that the powerless can have a better feeling of the circumstances that they are in, they build a morality for themselves, which is a slave morality, where the lesser are ‘good’ while the dominant are ‘evil.’ Nietzsche expresses his dissatisfaction with the psychologists who have attempted to give the origin of morality. They say that they are historians of morality; however they do not have a historical spirit. Their theories propose that originally individuals gain from altruism actions of others would applaud the actions and refer to them as ‘good.’ That means, what was initially ‘good’ and useful were taken as one and the same. With time, the genealogists propose, that the original association be forgotten, and the habit of referring to altruism actions ‘good’ resulted to the conclusion that they were somehow good of and in themselves (Guay, 97). Nietzsche does not agree with this account. He proposes that those who were shown “goodness” did not define ‘good’. Instead, it was the ‘good’ themselves who are the noble and the powerful who defined the ‘good.’ They came to view themselves as good when they became aware of the contrast between themselves and those that they control. That is the poor, weak and common people. Their position in power comprised of the power over words, the power of deciding what would be referred to as ‘good’ and what ‘bad’ (Guay, 98). This means that the power of morality is a changing one. It is not fixed and absolute. Each group exercises the power of their words to define ‘good’ and ‘bad.’ All this change comes form each group defining morality wanting to be termed as good. However, a group can only call it self ‘good’ and the other ‘bad’. There is no side that can refer to the other as ‘good.’ Nietzsche proposes that individual knowledge is dependent on the generalization of the reality that makes it possible to expresses it in language and can be understood by all. Thus, he means that people’s will to information is made upon, and it is even a sophistication of their will to ignorance. Philosophers ought not then to pose as defenders of knowledge or truth. For their truths are just but their prejudices and there is no philosopher who has yet been proven right. When questioning themselves and setting their spirits free from their bigotries philosophers are at their finest (Guay, 98). The free spirits that are among people thrive in isolation and independence, even though it is a hard and risky life to follow. One on his own he encounters unknown dangers that cannot be understood by anyone else. One cannot share his success or failures for they are owned individually. The views of these free spirits are likely to be misinterpreted and understood dangerously by the lesser individuals. Also, free spirits dedicated to knowledge will have a commitment of forgoing their independence and blending with others. Considering knowledge, the rule is more attractive than the exclusion (Guay, 99). Nietzsche’s criticism of truth and knowledge is mostly on the allegations that everything that is made comprehensible to most individuals has to be distorted and made simple. Thus, truth and knowledge are artificial certainties that individuals can fall back upon. He proposes that truths are based on the bedrock of prejudice. Since most people stay tied to supposition and prejudices, they appear not to understand truly deep ideas. Individuals can only comprehend things on a level that their intellect is able to handle, and they tend to simplify and distort ideas that are above them. Therefore, Nietzsche proposes that the free spirit has to appear covered to the public. He argues that individuals cannot comprehend such freedom of spirit and thus deduce it as something else (Guay, 99). This idea is specifically appropriate for Nietzsche, whose ideas have been misunderstood plus misinterpreted. Nietzsche targets to re-evaluate so much of the people’s assumptions that he is likely to be misunderstood. Nietzsche thoughts are dangerous as he is far from exact or careful in whatever he refers in all this. However, his conversation of the will power is just supposed to demonstrate how his “experimental technique” could be conducted; it is not supposed to be a case of it. Of course he finds himself in a trying habit of majority of philosophers of proposing that details can be worked out but not bothering to engage in detailing work. Instead, he dwells in a level of generalities, which is more prone to mistakes. Whereas Nietzsche experiment may be upon a bold and resourceful exercise of originality, it does not have the rigor and the detail of the experimental science needed (Guay, 100). Work Cited Guay, Robert. "Nietzsches "on the Genealogy of Morals": a Readers Guide (review)." The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. 40.1 (2010): 96-100. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“According to Nietzsche, what did good and bad originally man in early Essay”, n.d.)
According to Nietzsche, what did good and bad originally man in early Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1648204-according-to-nietzsche-what-did-good-and-bad-originally-man-in-early-heroic-western-society-who-according-to-nietzsche-re-valued-this-original-meaning-and-changed-it-into-good-and-evil-what
(According to Nietzsche, What Did Good and Bad Originally Man in Early Essay)
According to Nietzsche, What Did Good and Bad Originally Man in Early Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1648204-according-to-nietzsche-what-did-good-and-bad-originally-man-in-early-heroic-western-society-who-according-to-nietzsche-re-valued-this-original-meaning-and-changed-it-into-good-and-evil-what.
“According to Nietzsche, What Did Good and Bad Originally Man in Early Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1648204-according-to-nietzsche-what-did-good-and-bad-originally-man-in-early-heroic-western-society-who-according-to-nietzsche-re-valued-this-original-meaning-and-changed-it-into-good-and-evil-what.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Meaning Good and Bad According to Nietzsche

Nietzsche's ideas to modern society

nietzsche fails to judge morality in the correct perspective when he asserts (nietzsche, 1998, p.... ?? nietzsche's method of interpretation and reach about the merits of morality itself is wrong.... nietzsche's explanation of morality can be compared to the exercise of explaining a fruit, without tasting it.... That is the position of nietzsche when he articulates about morality.... nietzsche is an intellectual--a philosopher....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Nietzsche Moral Philosophy

For example, by stating that humility is good and voluntary, the slave morality lives in denial that humility got forced upon them by a master.... This report "nietzsche Moral Philosophy" looks at morality as a commitment to metaphysical and empirical claims about human agency.... Friedrich nietzsche also looked at the impact of morality on the norms and values of human beings that became considered higher than others.... nietzsche is not a moral nihilist....
7 Pages (1750 words) Report

Friedrich Nietzsche beyond Good and Evil

according to him, there is nothing said to be intrinsically good or bad with no consideration of content.... The report discusses Nietzsche's philosophy of 'beyond good and Evil' with the major focus on Prejudices of life.... His terminology Beyond good and Evil is a way of rejection of metaphysics leads him to deny the moral fact.... nietzsche used many terminologies in his quest to explain his philosophical reasoning.... Friedrich nietzsche was a philosopher from Germany, a poet, a composer, as well as a classical philologist....
9 Pages (2250 words) Book Report/Review

The Application of Nietzsche's Principles to Society

according to Aristotle, childhood nurture plays a major part in the advancement of moral character.... This essay "The Application of nietzsche's Principles to Society" argues that the current meaning of morality has been shaped by traditional views of justice or theories of justice that are shaped and molded by human nature.... nietzsche's "evolution of morality" points out that morality has been defined differently in different periods of history and that different people living at different periods in history have influenced the current meaning of morality....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Philosophy and Reason

One of the elements which are most central to nietzsche's philosophy is illustrated in his famous declaration that, 'God is Dead!... to nietzsche, the existence of God, religion, morality, ethics, free will, freedom, and laws are mistaken for they are nothing but imaginary causes, imaginary psychology.... ere, Nietzsche presents his doctrine of the two-fold history of good and evil.... This paper ''Philosophy and Reason'' tells that nietzsche's view against philosophy and reason derives from his views of the current western philosophical tradition, as organized around a conception of philosophy deriving from Socrates....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Resentment and the Genealogy of Morals

e articulates more fully the characteristics of Slave and Master Moralities in his work Beyond good and Evil.... This essay demonstrates that in the "Genealogy of Morals", Friedrich nietzsche continues his sustained attack on the moral edifice constructed by the Judeo-Christian ethic and the tenets of classical liberalism, tentatively begun in Human, All too Human.... In his elucidation of the slave/master morality distinction, nietzsche introduces the concept of ressentiment....
23 Pages (5750 words) Essay

Nietzsche and Mill

racing the origin of the general meaning of good and bad from class differentiation between the powerful and the weak eventually leading to a systemic unquestionable belief of correct and wrong judgments presents Nietzsche's opinion in a sharp reflection on morality.... Morality definitions of good and its practicality in the improvement of the quality of human life touch on a number of contested areas such as happiness, ethics and consequences.... Making comparisons of two of the most vocal morality philosophers to illustrate the need of a broader perspective in definition of On one hand, the position adopted by nietzsche through the famous dichotomies defining the genesis of good, bad and evil formulate the essence of morality from the basics....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil

"Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond good and Evil" paper explores Nietzsche's philosophy cutting across his terminologies, as well as his philosophical reasoning.... The paper discusses Nietzsche's philosophy of 'Beyond good and Evil' with the major focus on Prejudices of life.... Friedrich nietzsche was a philosopher from Germany, a poet, a composer, as well as a classical philologist.... The main ideas explored by nietzsche include the death of God, the will of power, Ubermensch, amorfati, perspectives, and the eternal recurrence....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us