StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This assignment "David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self" discusses a critical look at Hume’s view of the self that shows that Hume’s conception of the self is just an offshoot of his epistemology. In his epistemology, Hume held that all ideas have their origin in sense experience…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self"

Philosophy 30th April, Philosophy Final Assignment David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self A critical look of Hume’s view of the self shows that Hume’s conception of the self is just an offshoot of his epistemology. In his epistemology, Hume held that all ideas have their origin in sense experience; Hume actually believed that all ideas are derived from sense experience. For Hume, therefore, it is impossible to have ideas of things that we cannot sense or we cannot have their impressions. In his views conception of the self, therefore, David Hume argued that there is nothing like self simply because we cannot have impressions of the self. Hume claimed that in his reflections on the self, he learnt that it is impossible to have a unified impression of self without the particular perceptions. Hume argued that whenever he thinks about the concept of self, what he finds are particular perceptions such as heat or cold, love or hate, or pleasure or pain. Hume argued that these particular perceptions do not exist as a unified entity that can be termed self, Hume says, “ Pain and pleasure, grief and joy, passions and sensations succeed each other, and never all exist at the same time” (Selby-Bigger, 294). For this reason, therefore, Hume concluded self is an illusion, and that what we call self is a bundle of sensations. Unlike Hume, however, Immanuel Kant held that self is a reality and that we are able to know the self. Kant’s conception of the self is also an offshoot of his Epistemology. In his theory of knowledge, Immanuel Kant taught that there are two sources of human knowledge, which are sensibility and understanding. According to Immanuel Kant, sensibility gives us objects, while the understanding thinks and reasons about the given objects. For Kant, therefore, it is possible for us to have knowledge of things which have no direct impressions. Kant, therefore, argued that by looking for the self in sense impressions, Hume was looking for the self in the wrong place. For Kant, the self is the entity that unifies human experiences, thus enabling human mind to synthesis sense perceptions. For Kant, the self is what Rene Descartes had termed as the thinking I. Paul Sartre By arguing that existence precedes essence, Sartre meant that human beings are born indeterminate, or without their essence, and that it is human beings themselves who make up their essence. According to Sartre, human beings are not determined, before they are born, what they will be in life. For this reason, therefore, Sartre viewed human beings as existing first before they determine their essence of what they will be in life. According to Sartre, human beings are born with the freedom and the ability to become whatever they want to become in life; this in essence means that human beings are born with the freedom and the ability to form their own essence. For this reason, therefore, Sartre conceived existence in human beings preceding essence. Sartre’s view of human beings, however, makes human beings different from inanimate objects like dry-erase markers. This is because since inanimate objects do not have the possibility to form their own essence, essence precedes existence in inanimate objects. According to Sartre, in human existence, nothingness enables human beings to choose to become what they want to be in life. This is because, according to Sartre, the principle of nothingness is a necessarily condition for becoming. Without nothingness for Sartre, therefore, no change or becoming is possible. According to Sartre, therefore, nothingness, enables human beings to change and to become what they want to become in life. According to Sartre, nothingness and freedom are closely related. This is because, for Sartre, these two principles are necessarily conditions for becoming or change. For this reason, therefore, human beings, for Sartre, need both nothingness and freedom in order to be able to become what they want to be in life. Rene Descartes’ Arguments In the dreaming argument, Descartes argues it is possible that we think we are wakeful and conscious, while in fact we may be dreaming. Descartes argues in the dreaming argument that, when we are dreaming, we tend to think that we are wakeful and conscious. For this reason, therefore, Descartes concluded that it is possible that when we think that we are wakeful and conscious, we may be in fact dreaming. In the evil demon argument, Descartes argued that whatever we regard as true may be all deceptions of an evil demon. Descartes contends in this argument that all the ideas that we regard as true may not at all be true, but might be deception of an evil demon. Descartes argued in this argument that, unless we have enough reasons to believe that what we regard as is true is, indeed true, all our beliefs may be deceptions of an evil demon. The dreaming argument is supposed to show that our knowledge may be some unconscious beliefs that we hold, without consciously investigating the reasons on which the knowledge is based. The evil demon argument, on the other hand, is supposed to show that our arguments may not be based on sound logical reasoning and facts. The evil demon argument is meant to show that our beliefs may be some lies that some wise and evil people may have made us to believe are truths. Even if both of these arguments are true, according to Descartes, the one thing that remains certain is the fact that we are living, and that we are thinking. For Descartes, although we can doubt anything else in the world, we cannot doubt our thinking self. Synthetic Clone In my view, we will never be able to say, at any point, that the clone has become my deceased friend. The following are the three main reasons why I believe that there is no point at which we will be able to say that the synthetic clone has become my friend. To begin with, no matter how closely the synthetic clone may be made to assume the characteristics and the qualities of my deceased friend, the synthetic clone, however, will never be able to have all the qualities and the characteristics of my friend. The synthetic may closely resemble my deceased friend in speech, mannerisms, and memory, but the synthetic clone will never be able to have all the qualities and characteristics of my friend. Secondly, the synthetic clone will never have the same identity and individuality as my deceased friend. This is because according to the metaphysical principle of identity and individuality, no two things can share identity and individuality, irrespective of how closely the two resemble; not even identical twins can share identity and individuality. For this reason, therefore, since the synthetic clone can never have the same identity and individuality as my deceased friend, there is no point at which we can say that the synthetic clone has become my friend. Thirdly, even if it were possible for the synthetic clone to have all the qualities and the characteristics of my deceased friend, the clone would still not replace my deceased friend because I don’t moan the death of my friend only because of his characteristics and qualities. I normally moan my deceased friend because of who he is to me as a person, but not because of his/her characteristics and qualities. For that reason, therefore, there is no point at which we will be able to say that the synthetic clone has replaced my deceased friend. Epicurus on Death Epicurus’ argument that, death does not concern us because as long as we exist death is not with us, and when it will come we will no longer be in existence is a false argument. This is because the fact that so many people are afraid of death shows that death does indeed concern us. Even if death is not with us as long as we exist as Epicurus observes, we are, however, sure of facing death in the future. For that reason, therefore, we are concerned about death because we know that it is inevitable. When people claim to fear death, what they are really afraid of is losing life that they find meaningful; People want to continue living and they do not want to die. The other thing that people are afraid of in their fear of death is what will happen after death. People are normally uncertain of what happens after death. Although many world religions promise a happy life after death for those who have lived their earthly life well; despite this fact, however, many people are uncertain of what will happen after death and for that reason they are afraid of death. This fact shows that there is a gap between our desires and the nature of reality. This is because, although we desire to hold on to life as long as possible, the nature of reality, however, demands that at one point in our lives we must cease existing and die. This fact shows that humanely desires are sometimes are opposed to the true nature of reality. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 30”, n.d.)
Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 30. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1692431-assignment
(Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 30)
Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 30. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1692431-assignment.
“Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 30”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1692431-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF David Hume and Immanuel Kant on the Self

Levinas' First Philosophy

This ties in with ideas of ethics that Victorian-era scholars, hume, and Enlightenment scholars, in general, had about the obvious connection between empathy for others and moral behavior (Wright, 1983, pg.... This essay "Levinas' First Philosophy" answers the question of what does Levinas means when he claims that ethics is the first philosophy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Knowledge of Synthetic a Priori Mathematical and Logical Truths

The importance of empiricism was made known by david hume.... The paper "Knowledge of Synthetic a Priori Mathematical and Logical Truths" highlights kant's method and solution to his problem.... The second part will focus on the main features of kant's epistemology, which will discuss the distinctions between a posteriori from a priori knowledge, and analytic from synthetic judgments.... Afterward, I shall introduce kant's concept of synthetic a priori....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

On Morality and Ethics: Views of David Hume and Immanuel Kant

Apart from examining the tenets of the early classical Greek thinkers, however, no one can proceed to understand morality and ethics without getting to know david hume and immanuel kant and their respective ‘philosophies.... Kant's Doctrine Russian academic immanuel kant (1724-1804) is best remembered for his Transcendental Idealism which posited that knowledge is not materially real but merely the result of an a priori condition of the human mind.... Scottish genius david hume (1711-1776), one of the pillars of Naturalism, Empiricism, Skepticism, Utilitarianism and Classical Liberalism, fostered the idea of ‘science of man,' which seeks to give practical importance on the psychological grounds of human nature....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Hume and the Utility of Practical Governance

This paper ''hume and the Utility of Practical Governance'' tells that David Hume's criticism of the original contract is neither ideological nor rebellious radicalism.... nbsp; hume's essay “Of the Original Contract” argued that ideas about government by consent and the authority of the state must have context and a basis in historical fact to be practical.... nbsp;           hume decried the notion of the original contract as put forth by the Whigs, whom he felt offered little concrete evidence and left too much to discretion and interpretation....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Harvard justice course MICHAEL SINDEL FREEDOM AND KANT

Name Instructor Course Date Justice Freedom is oneself.... For instance, the moral side of committing murder is a test of freedom.... In the philosophy of utilitarianism, includes the principles of utility.... Therefore, harming an innocent and utilitarianism are two vital aspects of freedom that are quite controversial in choosing what is right and what is wrong....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

To know oneself

hellip; With this on hand, this paper will anchor its discussion to the philosophical discourse of Rene Descartes, John Locke, David Hume, and immanuel kant on self.... Descartes strongly believes that the only manifestation of the self is the capacity to think.... Thinking is simultaneous to the latter acts, which will bear knowledge to the self.... immanuel kant (qtd.... In the light of understanding, david hume (qtd....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Ethical Dimensions Of Medicine

immanuel kant's theory, on the other hand, states that what guides the actions of man is 'rationality' (Mason and Laurie, 2010).... immanuel kant stated that, “only those actions which are performed for the sake of duty have moral worth” (Mason and Laurie, 2010).... david hume lived in the 18th century and was a Scottish philosopher.... According to kant, human beings have the responsibility to perform what can be said to be 'reasonable' and not inconsistent....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The Theories of Causality

immanuel kant argued that people have innate skills to interpret causes; this might be made possible by discerning the regularities to see if they are accidental or necessary for an event (White, P.... david hume believed in a regularity theory of causality that causes an inference of non-causal observations as the time splices in the world are logically independent.... On the occasions of self-serving bias, people with high self-esteem equate their success with internal factors while equating their failures with external factors....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us