StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
This work called "Relationship between the Mind and the Brain" describes most of the body’s functions, the possibility of the brain to be the key interpreter of the mind’s content. The author outlines the connection between mental and brain events on the basis of various articles, thoughts of scholars, and writers. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain"

Due: Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Introduction Most of the body’s functions such as, thinking, emotions, memories and so forth are controlled by the brain. It serves as a central nervous system in the human body. The mind is the intellect/consciousness that originates in the human brain and manifests itself in emotions, thoughts, perceptions and so forth. This means that the brain is the key interpreter of the mind’s content. Analytic philosophy: relation between mental and brain events. Numerous speculations have been advanced to clarify the relationship between what we call your mind and your brain. They incorporate Jackson and Nagels journey to oppose recognizing what we call mental occasions with brain occasions, for distinctive reasons, while body problem by trying to answer the following questions; Is the human mind part of the brain or is the brain part of the mind? J.J.C. Savvy takes the restricting view on the same. Many theories have tried to solve the mind/ If they exist independently, how do they interact? Between the mind and the brain, which of the two is in charge? Mental events are those particular occurrences of things going on in the human mind that make up the conscious mind of a person and can be manipulated by the mental process. They are those private conversations going on inside the human head. The following scenario illustrates this point well; A woman window shopping in the mall sees and recognizes an old friend. Seeing and recognizing the old friend is an occurrence that is going on in the woman’s mind: perception. It is a mental event because it is happening in the woman’s mind. It’s only the individual that has access to the mind, other individuals can only try and interpret. In philosophy, the critical analysis on the relationship between the brain and mind is known the mind body problem. The following schools of thought have tried to solve the mind body problem; Dualism: this school of thought subscribes to the belief that the mind and brain exist independently of each other. Other dualists deny the fact that the mind is a part of the brain. This is because the mind and brain don’t share same qualities. The famous philosopher Rene Descartes, who is associated with dualism, believed that the mind is not a tangible substance because it lacks physical attributes (substance dualists). This is because the mind originates from inside the brain, and this makes the brain a tangible solid form of the mind (property dualists). However, they comprise of different properties. Mental events have a subjective quality because they possess raw feelings. In the article, “what is it like to be a bat?” Thomas Nagel used a bat as an example to illustrate the fact that even if human beings have all the knowledge on how bats use their abilities it doesn’t mean that they will be able to view the environment and the world at large from a bat’s point of view. The knowledge they have limits them to know how it feels like to be a bat. (Nagel 98) Thomas Nagel also opines that the mind is private because it’s only the individual that has access to the mind, other individuals can only try and interpret. Third parties will not know the individual’s exact intellect unless they make inferences based on his actions/behavior. Mental events are known by an individual without inference because the individual knows immediately. For instance, if a person is hungry, he/she will know the feeling of hunger without inference, others will know that the person is feeling hungry by trying to interpret his actions-verbal/non-verbal. Brain events such as talking are public because other individuals can observe and understand them. Since mental events are private to individual minds whereas brain events are not, mental events cannot be the same as brain events. Frank Jackson’s knowledge argument refuted claims that consciousness can be deduced from the physical truth. He used the example of Mary who lived in a black and white room; this meant that she had no color experiences. When she left the room, she saw a red tomato and learnt new truths about colors. (Jackson 186). According to him, physicalism is false because Mary would have learnt all the physical truths about human color vision before she left the room. This is because upon leaving the room she learnt something new on what it’s like to see colors.He argues that not all facts are physical facts because even if we know all the physical facts about love, we will not know beforehand what it is like to be in love. An individual who is not privy to the physical facts about love would learn new facts when they learn what it means to be in love. However, he later embraced the physicalism school of thought that all facts are physical facts. He rejected his knowledge argument and noted that Mary did not obtain new factual knowledge of color; she obtained the ability of seeing colors. He believed that she didn’t discover any new knowledge; the color vision come from her brain and enabled her to see red. Jackson’s critics argue that Mary gained something else as opposed to new knowledge. Mary only obtained the ability to experience what it felt like seeing colors as opposed to the knowledge of colors; she could recognize colors. The knowledge she acquired after leaving the room was acquaintance knowledge because she had factual knowledge about colors. The writer opines that since Mary was only exposed to monochromic surroundings, she would not have experience with other colors. This is because she could only see in black and white. Materialism: materialists believe that the mind and brain is one and the same thing. This theory opposes the dualistic approach. Materialism is related to monism and physicalism. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) opined that everything including the thought process and the state of mind can be explained by matter in motion. According to him, thoughts can be explained as the matter in motion of the brain. This school of thought asserts that the mind is the function of the brain. According to materialists, the mind is just the brain. A human being is the mind itself because the mind starts operating whenever there is there is intellect of individuality. The mind originates from inside the brain and this makes the brain a tangible form of the mind. Materialist philosophers such as J.J.C. Smart (1959) (who subscribe to the mind/brain identity theory) assert that brain states are mental states; they identify the mind with the brain. Ullin Place (1956) describes the mind as patterns of some brain activity. He likened the identity of the brain and mind processes to the same way science identifies lightning with electrical discharge. In his article, sensations and brain processes (1959) J.J.C identifies himself with Place’s theory and seeks to strengthen it. He argues that although mental and brain events mean different things, they refer to the same physical occurrence. Mental events such as thoughts, perception and so forth are the same with some physical event of the brain. He argued his opinion by saying: Maybe this is because I have not thought it out sufficiently, but it does seem to me, as though, when a person says, ‘I have an after image,’ he is making a genuine report, and that when he says ‘I have pain,’ he is doing more than ‘replace pain-behavior,’ and that ‘this more,’ is not just to say that he is in distress. I am not so sure, however, that to admit this is to admit that there are nonphysical correlates of brain processes. Why not sensations just be brain processes of a certain sort? (Smart pp.61-62) According to smart all an individual has to do in order to understand the mind is to understand how the brain operates. Mental events are made up of brain behavior. Place and Smart argue that experiencing a sensation like itchiness or pain is just being in a certain brain state. When an individual complains of a stomachache, he/she is trying to say that something is going on within him/her. This scenario makes both the mental and brain states identical. Smart argues that the similarity between the mind and brain events is empirical because upon discovery of science it was established that these two states which appeared to be different at first are actually identical. Mental events are just brain activities. Critics argue that identifying the mind with certain brain events is a very narrow argument because it implies that those living things without brains don’t have mental events. Saul Kripke refutes Smart’s brain/mind identity theory. He argues that claims of identity between mental and brains are false. The fact that materialists claim that that the mind and brain cannot exist without the other implies that they cannot be identical. They only complement each other. According to him, proving the fact that neither brain states nor mental states could exist without the other is a very hard, if not an impossible task. Idealism: theorists who subscribe to this school of thought assert that it’s only the mental state/ soul that exist because matter doesn’t exist. Idealism developed from the argument that only ideas in the mind exist. There is nothing outside and separate from the mental state because the universe is an illusion/ product of the mental process. Bishop George Berkeley (1710) who was a strong idealist claimed in his master argument that the mind is controlled by the Supreme Being (God); He is the only mental substance. He argued that there are no material substances because only ideas in the mind existed. Idealism is the argument that human beings think only in terms of the mind and so the universe must operate the same way. Critics argue that this is a wrong because it reduces everything in the universe to human terms yet other living organisms such as animals also exist. The world is not purely a construction of the mental state. They further argue that idealists tend to forget the fact that the form (part of what things are) cannot exist without it being part and parcel of matter: matter and form are inseparable. The space that surrounds is not merely the universe is not merely ideas of human minds. The writer subscribes to the materialism school of thought. A human being is the mind itself because the mind starts operating whenever there is there is intellect of individuality. The mind originates from inside the brain and this makes the brain a tangible form of the mind. In my view, the brain and mind are inseparable if the brain is not there then the mind will also not be there. This is because when the mind is altered directly, the intellect is also affected. The mind also shapes the brain because what the brain only does is to reflect what is going on in the human mind. The writer further opines that the dualism and idealism school of thoughts are outdated. This is because some of the philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and Berkeley lived many centuries ago. During their time science was not advanced, however, in modern times the numerous technological advancements have enabled philosophers like J.J.C Smart to discover that mental and brain states which were previously deemed to exist independently are in fact the same thing. Frank Jackson and Thomas Nagel’s views on the topic are quite outdated. Conclusion Although many philosophers have tried to solve the mind/body problem, it is best to concede that the inquiry of how the mind and the brain get connected stays something of a secret. Works cited Berkeley, George. A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. JB Lippincott & Company, 1878. Print. Nagel, Thomas. “What is it like to be a bat?” The philosophical review (1974): 435-450.Web. Smart, J.J.C. “Sensations and brain processes.” The Philosophical Review (1959): 141-156.Web. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Literature review, n.d.)
Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Literature review. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1847075-relationship-between-the-mind-and-the-brain
(Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Literature Review)
Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1847075-relationship-between-the-mind-and-the-brain.
“Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain Literature Review”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1847075-relationship-between-the-mind-and-the-brain.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain

Relationships Are Difficult Because Men and Women Are Inherently Different

These differences are not limited to the brain alone; there are physical and hormonal differences between the two sexes that cannot be denied at all.... Your Full Name Your Your 20 November 2012 Relationships are Difficult Because Men and Women are Inherently Different Relationships between the two sexes are often hard to understand and it is quite a feat for those involved to maintain them with ease.... The human brain is, from birth, “masculine” or “feminine,” which is to say that there are various differences between the brains of the two sexes that result in their different development and behavior....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The logical system of the mind

Are people merely physical machines who respond only to physical stimuli Is there actually a mind that is distinct and separate from the body Are minds capable of surviving the death of the body Are we more than material objects In this paper, I want to explore some of the questions regarding this issue. … The mind-body problem is the problem of determining the relationship between the human body and its mind.... We might still ask: Is there some way to explain what the mind, a mental substance, is, in terms of physical substance Or will we maintain that the mind is something totally different from physical bodies, and that we cannot explain what the one is in terms of the other at all Suppose instead that we deny that the mind is some mysterious substance, and we hold instead that there are only mental events and that "the mind" designates no more than a series of mental events We can still inquire about the relation between mind and body in a different way, in terms of the relation between mental events and physical events....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Evaluate a research source

However, the authors stress that teaching and programming can and must be imbued with sympathy, compassion, or concern in mind.... The connection between consideration or sympathy and instruction becomes more pronounced in English teaching and learning.... Current studies have substantiated the assumption that building meaningful teacher-student relationship will facilitate English instruction and learning.... In their 2010 article Knowing How to… now: Building Meaningful Relationships through Instruction That Meets the Needs of Students Learning English they emphasized the importance of building strong and productive teacher-student relationship while simultaneously trying to find out how to offer valuable, helpful, and Evaluating a Source Current studies have substantiated the assumption that building meaningful teacher-student relationship will facilitate English instruction and learning....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Topic: The mind - body connection and how this impacts how we learn

The students should be accepted as they are, by the teachers so, that the learning impacts effectively on mind & body.... Similarly in a class the learning relationship forms between a student and a teacher.... If we talk about conditioning, it involves two factors; classical conditioning – this conditioning relies on the automatic and involuntary behavior of the student....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Relationship with Daniel

It is important to provide an explanation that currently, my7 relationship with Daniel is at the intensifying stage.... It is at this stage when people within a relationship are able to disclose more about each other, with the intention of finding out whether their actions will be reciprocated.... During the beginning of our relationship, it was always difficult to know what Daniel was thinking about....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Either criticize the position that our minds are immaterial souls or that our minds are brains

There are characteristics that bring about the distinction between the mind and the brain.... That is how new The dual schemes that occur in the world through the mind and the soul create mysteries that may lead to problems that are considered to be worse than the initial.... To comprehend the relationship that occurs between the mind and brain, there is the need to understand the relationship that occurs between what things are able to do and what things are....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Atmosphere and Body Movement

The restraints in the first example are mechanical or physical whereas those in the second example are abstract and a result of the interplay of the mind and body of the individual in the scenario.... the brain processes the information taken by the eyes and the body produces reflex actions as well as coordinated movements to respond to the external stimuli in a way that makes it the most convenient for the body to move in the given space and the challenges contained therein....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Do Memories Reflect the Operation of Different Systems or Are They Ways of Accessing a Unitary Store

"Do Memories Reflect the Operation of Different Systems or Are They Different Ways of Accessing a Unitary Long-Term Store" paper states that one of the biggest problems related to visual perception lies in the fact that the objects which people see are not indeed what the retina showed the brain.... It takes into consideration the usage of the eyes which see the light and thus interpret the viewed object to the brain.... Humans might not know it by their nature which is in an ever-changing state of psychological needs but their emotions and more so their body changes its shape so as to get itself either psychologically acclimatized with the strenuous tasks one has to go through or through pain indicted on one's body and mind, for that matter, for a long duration of time....
6 Pages (1500 words) Article
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us