StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Corporate Governance with Reference to Shareholders and Stakeholder Interests - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Corporate Governance with Reference to Shareholders and Stakeholder Interests" discusses corporate governance in the US and the UK which are both focused on the controls on processes that affect the financial health or the main business of the organization…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.8% of users find it useful
Corporate Governance with Reference to Shareholders and Stakeholder Interests
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Corporate Governance with Reference to Shareholders and Stakeholder Interests"

?A. Discuss the meaning of the term corporate governance with reference to shareholders and stakeholder interests. All shareholders or stakeholders in organizations covered by the corporate governance law are mandated to elect responsible and qualified board of directors to manage and direct the affairs of the organization towards their mutual goals. The board of directors shall provide entrepreneurial leadership in the affairs of the organization to ensure that their common interest is protected and their goals satisfied. The board of directors not only have the fiduciary responsibility to manage the organizations affair to the best of their abilities provided that it is within the ambit of business ethics. Every stakeholders or shareholders shall also have the right to examine the organization’s books of account to its satisfaction. Dialogues and consultation between the board of directors and the stakeholders should not be limited to the annual general membership (AGM) meeting. In the interest of the public’s and stakeholder’s rights, the accurate state and fiscal condition of the organization shall be fully disclosed to the stakeholders. The United Kingdom’s Corporate Governance Code’s aims to protect the interest of stakeholders or shareholders of the organization in particular and the public’s interest in general. The Governance Code mandates that controls and risk mitigation processes with the aim of protecting the interest of stakeholders are instituted and maintained by the executive board tasked to manage the affairs of the organization on day to day basis. The executive board are mandated to regularly report incidents and or explain incidents that would appear to be serious breaches in security. B. Explain why over the last two decades, numerous attempts have been made to improve corporate governance in the UK Organizations that operated in multiple jurisdictions have in the past been threatened by scandals or have been embroiled in scandals that affected not only the financial health of the countries where they operate but also the shareholders who are residents of the UK. Foremost of these are financial institutions hold principal offices in the UK or most of its stakeholders are UK residents and the same organizations due to size, operation and influence have threatened the economic health of a country or the region in general if they are not properly managed. Exercising its inherent right to protect the public’s interest, the government has been mandated to ensure that corporate governance is properly implemented in every organization where it has jurisdiction. This is to ensure that any financial mismanagement is detected and mitigated before it can adversely affect the entire organization and the country in general. Corporate governance is a set of controls designed to ensure that all decisions of the executive leadership of an organization are compliant with good governance or if not, the leadership should be able to explain the rationale behind such decisions or directions. The UL Combined Code of Corporate Governance are therefore designed to prevent a national financial crisis that can be rooted from mismanagement or mishandling of funds in particular or the company in general from taking place. Recognizing the need from the experience of other countries, specially the United States, and was affirmed by its own experience in the 2008 financial crisis, the UK reviewed its corporate governance law. The need to improve stricter controls and update the intent and scope of the law prompted the review and revision of the UK combined code of corporate governance. C. Outline the recommendations of the UK Combined Code (2010) concerning the ‘board chairman’ and briefly discuss why the code does not support board duality. Corporate governance practices have been embedded in corporate structures to make corporate officers more aware of their responsibilities and demand from them accountability and transparency in the performance of their fiduciary functions as well as in undertaking its decision and policy making processes to protect the interest of its stakeholders and the public in general. One of the reforms embodied in corporate governance is the selection of independent directors to the board which would provide the cold neutrality of an impartial and dispassionate corporate officer to avoid excessive and unbridled in the exercise of corporate prerogatives. Thus, it is required that the Boards for big companies to have at least one half of the sitting Board, excluding the Chairman, as independent directors while small companies require at least two independent directors who shall not only ensure that strategies or policies are challenged and debated upon but equally to dissect the performance of the management towards the achievement of the goals and implementation of the policies enunciated by the Board as well as to monitor compliance with the reporting requirements. The independent directors shall serve as the check and balance as it is likewise tasked to verify and affirm the integrity of all financial documents and information, the soundness of the risk management plans and appropriateness of remuneration package and manner of succession. The determination of independence of a director is not limited to character and judgment or lack of material interest. Even those who may have relationships or circumstances perceived to affect judgment may be appointed provided that a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure in the search is conducted. Consequently, the appointment shall be based on merit pursuant to the qualification standards giving due regard to the balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the board, including diversity and gender sensitivity. If a director is declared as independent notwithstanding existence of debilitating relationships or circumstances, the reasons must be provided the shareholders for its consideration. The duality of a Board is proscribed. The Chairman is responsible for the leadership of the Board and to ensure the effectiveness of the Board in the discharge its duties and functions. The Chairman’s duty includes preparation of the agenda with the assurance that sufficient time for discourse shall be allotted to tackle all issues, proposals and policies set forth in the agenda. The Chairman shall be selected from among the Board and in no case shall the Chairman become the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in concurrent capacity. This is prohibited but nonetheless admits exception as when the Board decides that the Chairman shall likewise sit as CEO. This would require advance consultation with major shareholders with the appropriate justification for the appointment at that present time and stated in the next annual report. The natural barrier in the roles of the Chairman and the CEO is delineated and established to avoid conflict of interest. It is reiterated that the primary functions of the Chairman, among others, are to plan the stratagem and direction of the business and to evaluate the performance of management in the manner set forth by the Board. On the other hand, a CEO is tasked with the day to day operation and management of the business as well as to implement the policies and strategies decided by the Board. Thus, if the power and authority is concentrated in one individual alone, it is prone to abuse as safeguards and controls were eliminated. This will ultimately damage and prejudice stakeholders as the exercise thereof may serve vested interest only or equally, to cover up fraudulent activities. Corporate governance not only demands compliance with the legal requirements but likewise demand ethical, virtuous and honourable behaviour amongst the corporate officers to ensure the stability of business and establish trust in its shareholders which ultimately redound to economic growth and development that trickle to the public at large. Corporate governance in the US and the UK are both focused on the controls on processes that affect the financial health or the main business of the organization. Security measures also manifest itself in the form of controls and the reporting of exceptions and the corrective measures implemented to plug the hole of those breaches. Business continuity and longevity is also the main focus of the corporate governance. United Kingdom. Financial Reporting Council. The UK Corporate Governance Code. 2010. Financial Reporting Council Limited. London: England. [Online] Available at http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/Corporate_Governance/UK%20Corp%20Gov%20Code%20June%202010.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2011] Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Combine Code Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1405685-combine-code
(Combine Code Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1405685-combine-code.
“Combine Code Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1405685-combine-code.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Corporate Governance with Reference to Shareholders and Stakeholder Interests

Maximising Shareholder Wealth vs. Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Theory: Tracing the Debates

Corporate Governance and stakeholder Theory: Tracing the Debates It is imperative to trace the debates between the competing schools of thought with respect to making shareholder wealth maximization the primary overriding goal of a corporation.... This paper argues that instead of wealth generation for shareholders, the underlying principle that should inform decision-making processes of corporations should be the improvement of corporate governance.... This paper discusses two specific areas where corporate governance can be better improved....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Corporate Governance (Shareholder and Stakeholder Capitalism)

corporate governance with the... Corporate Governance (Shareholder and stakeholder Capitalism) Difference between Shareholder and stakeholder Capitalism It is observed in few of the countries like Germany that organisations are primarily stakeholder based.... According to a classic review with regard to the subject of corporate governance, it was stated by Shleifer & Vishny (1997) that the notion of corporate governance was a clear-cut viewpoint of the organisations which was at times addressed to be the division existing between control as well as ownership....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

How does the shareholder model of corporate governance impact in the management of labour

The shareholder model of corporate governance is based on the premise that the actions of the company must reflect the best interests of its investors.... Because there are measurable differences between the goals of managers and shareholders, corporate governance structures are put into place to ensure that appropriate needs are met.... ecause the shareholder model of corporate governance is restricted towards the goals of only the investors, most businesses will eventually evolve into a stakeholder form of governance....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Agency Theory and Rise of Corporate Governance Globally

In order to achieve this, it will include two other frameworks of the firm as benchmarks: stewardship theory and stakeholder theory.... Cadbury report requires that boards of directors should be accountable to their shareholders and both should play... Through corporate governance, shareholders.... corporate governance can be understood through various frameworks of the firm.... In this case, This paper attempts to find the relevance of agency theory in explaining the rise of corporate governance worldwide....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Legal Relevance of the Enlightened Shareholder Concept

In a much-generalized framework of discourse, the enlightened shareholder concept can be said to be an approach to corporate governance whereby the role and place of the shareholder have been redefined in a more elaborate and expanded manner (Sealy and Worthington, 2010).... y the use of the term approach, reference is being made to the fact that the enlightened shareholder concept has become a way of corporate life that entails a set of conduct and actions that must be exhibited or put up to justify the execution of the concept (Micklethwait and Adrian, 2003)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Shareholder and Stakeholder Models of Corporate Governance

The paper "Shareholder and stakeholder Models of Corporate Governance" highlights that generally speaking, it could be noted that the stakeholder model should be characterized as of key importance for the development of an effective employment relationship.... The first of the above models, the shareholder model, is based on the following view: businesses belong to shareholders; in this context, for businesses the interests of their shareholders should be set as a priority (Brink, 2011, p....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Global Financial Ethics

Some of the key theories of corporate governance are agency theory, stewardship theory, and stakeholder theory.... Modern multinational corporations show interdependence between the company and its shareholders and hence can be said to be using the stakeholder theory of corporate governance.... In today's corporate world, good corporate governance is mandatory.... Every stakeholder group requires the practice of good corporate governance in business corporations....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Shareholder-Centered Nature of Australian Corporate Laws and Plight of Stakeholders

For years scholars have shown interest in the effects of the shareholding system of corporate governance utilized in the United Kingdom and especially Australia.... International corporations have also interested in the application of corporate governance laws.... For years scholars have shown interest in the effects of the shareholding system of corporate governance utilized in the United Kingdom and especially Australia.... International corporations have also interested in the application of corporate governance laws....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us