StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

How do you think the nature of law should be understood - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
How do you think the nature of law should be understood? The nature of law is grounded in human nature and consciousness. The fundamental factor that distinguishes between human beings and other living beings is the sense of distinguishing between the right and the wrong that is implanted in the human consciousness naturally whereas other living beings including animals and birds lack this sense…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.8% of users find it useful
How do you think the nature of law should be understood
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "How do you think the nature of law should be understood"

How do you think the nature of law should be understood? The nature of law is grounded in human nature and consciousness. The fundamental factor that distinguishes between human beings and other living beings is the sense of distinguishing between the right and the wrong that is implanted in the human consciousness naturally whereas other living beings including animals and birds lack this sense. It is the very sense that makes the humans feel justified and reasonable to dwell in the society as families and socialize with others to build the social network.

Humans don’t need a law to tell that killing another human being without any justifiable reason is wrong; they know it and this knowledge is natural-born in humans. Likewise, every individual naturally knows that it is important to cover the body because it is a sign of modesty and integrity. Lying to somebody feels wrong intrinsically because we know that the other person is being misguided. Likewise, helping an old man cross a road just feels right because it lends a sense of satisfaction and happiness.

Naturally, the psychology of human beings has been shaped in such a way that they can tell what is wrong and what is right and everybody would agree to it. As human beings, we have certain rights and responsibilities toward others. If the sense of distinction between the right and the wrong is naturally implanted in the human psychology, the question that arises is; then why do people hold different, contrasting, and conflicting views over such matters as euthanasia, abortion, and gay marriages?

The answer to this is simple; those who condemn these practices do so because of their conscience tells them that these practices are wrong. Others, who speak in favor of these controversial issues do so not because they really think that these practices are ethically justified, but because they want to protect and safeguard their personal interests. By nature, a human being finds attraction in evil things but getting involved in the evil practices lends a sense of dissatisfaction and guilt. On the other hand, human beings naturally find it difficult to do most of the good deeds because one has to become self-less to do most of the good deeds, but doing good deeds lends an individual a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment.

This sense of dissatisfaction upon doing evil deeds and the sense of satisfaction upon doing good deeds fundamentally originates in the human conscience. Some people consider their conscience more important than their attraction to do evil deeds whereas others compromise upon their conscience to nurture the evil attractions. Laws are made as standard practices and principles to guard human behavior. Although different people hold different views regarding the laws and regulations prevailing in a certain region, with some approving of them while others considering them a violation of human rights, yet the law making bodies develop laws with mutual consensus of the people who are empowered to make these decisions by the public.

People vote for their favorite governors and the one who acquires the majority of votes acquires the government. Since that individual represents the trust and confidence of a vast majority of people living in a region, he/she gets in the position to make laws that apply on all the people living in that region. Although laws are standards, yet individuals may vary in their level of approval for them. There are two basic kinds of laws; governmental laws and individual’s laws. Governmental laws are those that apply on everyone whereas individual’s laws are those that every individual develops for himself/herself.

As discussed before, every human being has a conscience that tells him/her what is right and what is wrong. People establish limits for themselves depending upon how much freedom they allow themselves to do the wrong. This is the reason why certain people commit murders whereas others do not. In addition to that, individual’s laws are applied in all matters in everyday life whereas governmental laws guard human behavior in specific areas; particularly those in which an individual’s actions affect other people in the society.

Concluding, the nature of law should be understood as a combination of the intrinsic sense that every human being holds that helps him/her distinguish between the right and the wrong, and the level of freedom that every human being wants to enjoy in terms of being free of the limits imposed by his/her conscience on his/her actions. Laws are of two kinds; governmental laws and individual’s laws. The nature of law has a strong link with human nature and conscience.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“How do you think the nature of law should be understood Essay”, n.d.)
How do you think the nature of law should be understood Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1459090-how-do-you-think-the-nature-of-law-should-be
(How Do You Think the Nature of Law Should Be Understood Essay)
How Do You Think the Nature of Law Should Be Understood Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1459090-how-do-you-think-the-nature-of-law-should-be.
“How Do You Think the Nature of Law Should Be Understood Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1459090-how-do-you-think-the-nature-of-law-should-be.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF How do you think the nature of law should be understood

What Is Humes Theory Regarding Causation How Does It Show The Limits Of Human Understanding

By mind-level thinking, the functioning and limitations of the mind cannot be understood.... I must also confess that, though all the learned, for several ages, should have employed themselves in fruitless search upon any subject, it may still, perhaps, be rash to conclude positively that the subject must, therefore, pass all human comprehension.... Application of this law is not only confined to the space flights science, but to the entire universe....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

A Comparison between Confucianism and Taoism

Here, there is a main manuscript known as the 'Tao Te Ching' that has many poetic monologues that are best understood if read as one.... According to Confucius, each person should act with virtue in all social matters such as the family, community, state and the kingdom at large in order to ensure order and unity.... The Tao explains the power that drives the universe and the wonder of human nature (Ford, 1).... On the other hand, in Ford, 1, Confucius once said that, “…If one learns but does not think, one is lost; if one thinks but does not learn, one is in danger…”These kinds of statements from the leaders of these two religions show that they had very different views with regard to education and thinking....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Invitation to Social and Cultural Anthropology

Instructor Date In what specific ways do you plan to think or live differently or to carry out your personal or professional roles differently as a consequence of this course?... Instead it tells you what you should expect.... All these subjects try to explain aspects of human nature or behavior using one frame only.... You become intellectually independent when you are able to think of possibilities.... There is no cost of it for example the person does not have to think critically or repetitively....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Comparison of Philosophers

What do you think of 'choice' as being that which first comes to play in a life We make choices and 'prioritize' which goods we wish to pursue.... Expressed in Aristotle's language, the law reads: "It is impossible for the same attribute at once to belong and not to belong to the same thing in the same relation.... If you understand that, then you also understand why philosophy is not irrelevant to the "common man".... As you know, the common belief now days are that philosophy will provide contentment, or some kind of consolation because of a particular broadening of the mind....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Become What You Think

What is the nature of reality?... This thesis "Become What you think" seeks to understand how positive thinking has the placebo effect to lead one to become what he thinks, to understand reality.... All diseases are supposed to be psychosomatic in nature and it is said that if we can change our thought process, the physical ailment can be cured.... Why do two people think and behave differently when it is the same energy flowing through both?...
28 Pages (7000 words) Thesis

Consciousness and Intent: The Key to Good Health and Anything You Want

The reason this should be studied in the professional study of metaphysics is that it is a concept that works to better a person's life once they understand it.... nbsp;… This is the preliminary process of the law of Attraction (LOA) that many people use successfully and others struggle to use it well.... he law of Attraction (“The LOA”) is a concept that many people attempt to understand but that seems to elude them.... Still, when one does a Google search for  law of Attraction, there are over 9 million websites that are shown....
37 Pages (9250 words) Thesis

Temptations for Jesus and Buddha

hun Tzu practiced by the politicians of the United States would change the whole nature of political discourse.... Knowing how to behave as a fan at a baseball game or how to enjoy a play without annoying those around you seems to be an art that is being lost.... I cannot help but notice that all of these individuals seem to be extremely insecure, regardless of how they present themselves to the media and the American people....
14 Pages (3500 words) Article

There Is No Such Thing as a Neutral Question

nbsp; The two areas of knowledge that this paper deals with include religion and law.... The first area of knowledge, religion takes the question of the existence of God to prove that there is no such thing as a neutral question, while the second area of knowledge, law, take the example of a lawyer to support my point.... On the contrary, a neutral question is of the sort that is totally unbiased in nature, does not take sides or is asked with an open mind, and the person asking the question is ready to accept any answer that may or not conforms to the views and beliefs of the person....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us