StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
The article “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq” by Bellamy explores the international engagement with Darfur. The article analyzes the reason behind the interference of the international community in the Darfur conflict in Sudan…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq"

?Article Evaluation One of the important articles in ethics and international affairs, “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq” by A.J. Bellamy (2005) explores the international engagement with Darfur. Based on the norm of humanitarian intervention since the 2003 war in Iraq, the article analyzes the actual reason behind the interference of the international community in the Darfur conflict in Sudan. The major discussion in the article centers on the distinction between the responsibility of international community to protect Darfur and the tendency to play the Trojan horse. Thus, he raises the question whether the states and regional organizations actually distinguish their “responsibility to protect” civilians at risk, or if the humanitarian intervention can be “perceived as a “Trojan horse” used by the powerful to legitimize their interference in the affairs of the weak.” (Bellamy 2005, p. 32). Therefore, the fundamental discussion of the article is on the subject of these two positions, in order to examine whether the Iraq war has shifted the balance between them, and the author poses an essential question about the legitimacy of the “supreme humanitarian emergencies” of the world. In his analysis, the author offers a brief overview of the norm of humanitarian intervention based on the ‘responsibility to protect’, and makes a detailed investigation of the international response to Darfur. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the article by A.J. Bellamy in the context of its subject matter and other literature on the area, by pulling out the key arguments by Bellamy and assessing them in the background of the existing literature on the topic. In a reflective exploration of the arguments of A.J. Bellamy in the article, it becomes lucid that he takes up a very relevant topic for discussion and offers some convincing arguments in a systematic discussion. Significantly, the context of its subject matter is highly important to the international debates in the background of the norms of humanitarian intervention since the 2003 war in Iraq. The norm of humanitarian intervention as put forward by the author has a great relevance in the context of rising interference of the international community in the affairs of the local governments and states in the contemporary world. According to the author, the situation in Darfur has been crucial in revealing two of the most delicate changes to the humanitarian intervention norm at the international scenario. A.J. Bellamy puts forward his arguments in a very effective way when he argues that the debates on Darfur have offered convincing evidence about the weakened standing of the United States and the U.K. as norm carriers of the international humanitarian intervention. He also makes use of the arguments by other writers on the topic to prove that there is a lack of confidence in the leading role taken by these states at the international setting, although there is no perceptible change in the level of consensus about humanitarian intervention. Another major argument by the author in this context is that the Darfur debates have provided an increasing interest in the focus on the language of a “responsibility to protect”, according to which the international society has the duty or responsibility to protect the interest of the regional states and governments. On the basis of the Darfur case, the author tries to prove that the language involving responsibility to protect “has now enabled anti-interventionists to legitimize arguments against action by claiming that primary responsibility in certain contested cases still lies with the state, and not (yet) with an international body.” (Bellamy 2005, p. 33). Therefore, the arguments made by the author in this article have helped highlight the important and responsible role to be played by the international society based on the humanitarian intervention norm. In other words, these arguments by the author are important eye-opener to the leading players of the international intervention in regional affairs and issues such as the Darfur issue to take up this role with an understanding of the “responsibility to protect”. In a similar discussion on the topic of the international intervention in regional affairs and issues of the Darfur, Williams and Bellamy (2005) prove that the international society’s feeble response on the Darfur’s crisis has failed to recognize the role of the “responsibility to protect”. According to them, three main factors are useful in explaining the West’s disinclination to intervene in Darfur. According to Williams and Bellamy, these main factors include aspects such as the increased skepticism about the West’s humanitarian interventionism, especially after the invasion of Iraq; Western strategic interests in Sudan; and the relationship between the crisis in Darfur and Sudan’s other civil wars. The most essential conclusion of their analysis is that “the emerging norm of humanitarian intervention remains weak and strongly contested, and that advocates of the ‘responsibility to protect’ approach have yet to persuade their governments to help save populations in danger.” (Williams and Bellamy 2005, p. 27). Therefore, the ‘responsibility to protect’ approach has been used widely to prove the inability of the international players to deal with the burning issues of the world with a humanitarian outlook. These points of view offer additional evidence to the argument put forward by A.J. Bellamy who maintains that “responsibility to protect” talk has been used in the international debates to contest international activism as much as to support it. (Bellamy 2005, p. 33). There have been similar discussions on the role of the humanitarian intervention norm based on the case of Darfur’s crisis and the intervention done by the international society. In one of the most recent articles on the topic, Kubicek and Parke (2011) argue that the EU nations failed to recognize the need for international intervention in Darfur based on the humanitarian intervention norm which ultimately resulted in the slow pace of the commitment shown by the EU in taking policy-based actions on the issue. According to them, the EU nations did not make use of the opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to human rights and the emerging norm of the responsibility to protect in Darfur and the EU policy was found wanting. Exploring the EU’s actions and non-actions in Darfur in light of the “lessons of Bosnia”, the authors bring out the gap between EU rhetoric and policy, which ultimately demonstrates the need for humanitarian intervention norm in international affairs and interventions. (Kubicek and Parke 2011, p. 60). Therefore, Kubicek and Parke prove that the international society’s feeble response in the Darfur’s crisis highlight the significance of the humanitarian intervention norm. In his discussion on the norm of humanitarian intervention, A.J. Bellamy refers to the general acceptance of the UN Charter that that the Security Council has a legal right to authorize humanitarian intervention and the consensus among the liberal states that there is a moral right to intervene without council authorization in extreme cases. However, he maintains that these sanctions may result in the breach of the norm of humanitarian intervention and argues that there are two essential questions to consider in this context: “First, who has the authority to sanction humanitarian intervention when the Security Council is blocked by the veto? Second, when should a humanitarian crisis trigger potential armed intervention?” (Bellamy 2005, p. 34). Therefore, it is fundamental to realize that the arguments put forward by Bellamy have great significance in the context of the current international scenario, especially in the context of the “war on terror”. Based on the case analysis of the Darfur experience, Bellamy claims that no one can overestimate the strength of humanitarian intervention norm by arguing that the importance of this norm has diminished after September 11. On the contrary, he argues that the debates about how to respond to the crisis in Darfur have proved the claim that, as a result of the Iraq war, the credibility of the United States and the U.K. as humanitarian intervention norm carriers has significantly diminished at the international level. “Throughout discussions on Darfur, some states and organizations expressly rejected American- and British-led activism in the Security Council, while endorsing the AU intervention and calling for its expansion.” (Bellamy 2005, p. 34). Therefore, the author comes up with persuasive arguments for the discussion at the international level and proves that the discussions on Darfur provide significant evidence about the role of humanitarian intervention norm. As the crisis in Darfur represented a supreme humanitarian emergency, “the crisis in Darfur represented a supreme humanitarian emergency. It therefore provides an important test case of international society’s commitment to an emerging norm of humanitarian intervention.” (Williams and Bellamy 2005, p. 27). Significantly, some of the most celebrated scholarly studies in the area also prove that the humanitarian intervention norm has great relevance in the contemporary world scenario. According to Wheeler and Morris (2007), “the Security Council’s reluctance to act over Darfur is cited in support of this position, and it is evident that the Iraq war has made many states, especially the Arab world, conscious of the need to reassert the primacy of the non-intervention principle.” (Wheeler and Morris, 2007, p. 460). In an essential analysis of the arguments made by A.J. Bellamy in his article “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq”, it becomes evident that these arguments have great relevance in the context of its subject matter and other literature on the area. In conclusion, it is important to recognize that the arguments proposed by A.J. Bellamy in this article have attained international attention which led to heated debates on the topic. Bibliography BELLAMY, A.J. 2005. “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq”. Ethics and International Affairs. 19 (2), 31-54. WILLIAMS, Paul D. and BELLAMY, Alex J. 2005. “The Responsibility to Protect and the Crisis in Darfur.” SAGE Publications. 36 (1). pp. 27–47. KUBICEK, Paul and PARKE, Dana. 2011. “European Union and Humanitarian Intervention Bosnia, Darfur, and Beyond.” EU External Affairs Review. WHEELER, Nicholas J. and MORRIS, Justin. 2007. “The Iraq War as a Humanitarian Intervention.” The Iraq Crisis and World Order. Ramesh Thakur (Ed). Pearson Education. p. 460. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Literature review”, n.d.)
Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Literature review. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1437907-esponsibility-to-protect-or-trojan-horse-the-crisis-in-darfur-and-humanitarian-intervention-after-iraq-by-bellamy
(Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Literature Review)
Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/history/1437907-esponsibility-to-protect-or-trojan-horse-the-crisis-in-darfur-and-humanitarian-intervention-after-iraq-by-bellamy.
“Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Literature Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1437907-esponsibility-to-protect-or-trojan-horse-the-crisis-in-darfur-and-humanitarian-intervention-after-iraq-by-bellamy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse: The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq

The Responsibility to Protect Issues

Introduction The responsibility to protect was established in 2001 through the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignity (ICISS).... Basically it states that countries have the responsibility to protect their citizens, and, as long as the country is performing this function, then the country has sovereignty over its affairs.... However, if the state is unwilling or unable to do this, then its sovereignty is temporarily suspended, the international community takes over the responsibility to protect, and other nations can step in to protect that country's citizens (Pattison, 2009, p....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

From Humanitarian Intervention to the Notion of the Responsibility to Protect

From Humanitarian Intervention to the Notion of the responsibility to protect: A Theoretical or Practical Shift?... War Crimes, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity War crimes refer to the excessive violation of human rights within wars, and a serious breach of international humanitarian law (Clarisse, 2011).... darfur 20 Chapter 3: Looking forward 26 Conclusion 31 Sources Used 32 Bibliography 34 Introduction One of the most significant discussions in legal and moral philosophy is protecting human rights....
42 Pages (10500 words) Dissertation

Political science - Africa

Africa is the home to Negroes,an archaic racial people of high melanin content mainly of African origin.... nly the native Negroes could survive the ruthless landmass consisting of dense jungles with wild animals,treacherous massive rivers and lakes and harsh deserts that make up the second largest continent in the world....
22 Pages (5500 words) Research Paper

Humanitarian Crisis in Darfur

Given the slow global response to the genocide in darfur, Sudan, the United States government needs to stop up and take action, and help the humanitarian crisis that is taking place in darfur right now.... Just these facts only warrant intervention on the basis of humanitarian need, but these numbers alone are not the only reasons the United States should get involved in darfur.... In fact, the United States should have gotten involved in darfur a long time ago, but still has decided to leave innocent people to die at the hands of a violent government....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Assistance to Victims of Genocide in Rwanda

million people in darfur in December 2004, and it estimates that it will have to feed at least 2.... However, this economic attack on darfur has a permanent aspect to it, because the government cut down crop-producing acacia and mango trees.... The paper "Assistance to Victims of Genocide in Rwanda" highlights that various interventions by highly experienced, properly funded, well-trained, and well-equipped peace-keeping forces; and immediate investigation with respect to the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

States Use of the Responsibility to Protect

Because of this, states use their own troops to carry out the responsibility to protect Role1.... he principle of the state responsibility to protect is a norm and military interventions are the last resort and permission from the United Nations Security Assembly is a requisite before use of force.... n this article, I will define the meaning of responsibility to protect and will discuss the state's responsibility to protect norm by providing instances where the states used international organizations to advance this norm....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Case Study Project . SEE DETAILED INSTRUCTION BELLOW

This case study is intended to analyse and evaluate the international response to the humanitarian crisis in darfur, Sudan (2003-2009), whose immediate consequences and far-reaching repercussions nearly rivalled the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, with over 200 000 fatalities – some.... n the early 2003, the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA/M) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), who are believed to have themselves attacked civilians in darfur, started attacking the government forces in response to raids mounted by the government-backed militias (Bellamy, 2005: 31; Collins, 2005: 156; BBC News, 2010)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Genocide and Humanitarian Intervention

This paper, Genocide and humanitarian intervention, stresses that the 20th century was arguably one of the most violent in human history.... The purpose of this report is to provide an analysis of the human rights issue of genocide and humanitarian intervention.... Despite optimistic dreams, harmony was shattered in the early 1990s with the explosion of ethnic conflict and humanitarian tragedies on the grandest scale.... While ethnic conflict and humanitarian crises have existed since the dawn of time, for the first time ever images of extreme bloodshed, violence, and even genocide were broadcast into the millions of people around the world, from New York to New Delhi and from London to Lagos....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us