StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Confederacies and Chiefdoms - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
 This essay seeks to investigate the comparison and contrasts between the Confederacies and Chiefdoms in the Eastern North America, with a view to understanding the number of people under each form of political organization, the nature of their powers and the reasons behind the formations. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Confederacies and Chiefdoms
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Confederacies and Chiefdoms"

Confederacies and Chiefdoms The ancient world was organized differently from the modern world that we live today. The political organization was not uniform even within a single country, with different communities having different forms of political organizations. The Eastern North America is one perfect examples of a region that had multiple political organizations of communities, which presents a suitable opportunity for the comparison and contrast of the different types of political organizations that were found in this period. The region was inhabited by different communities, which had different ways of organizing their political authority thus providing a system of giving their communities some sense of order and leadership. The main forms of political organizations that were found in the Eastern North America were Confederacies and Chiefdoms (Diaz-Granados & Duncan, 2004). The major communities that were living in this region include the Hurons, the Iroquois and the Powhattans, operating under the political organization form of confederacy, and the Cahokia, who were mainly organized in the chiefdom political organization form (Johnson & Smith, 2003). The Confederacies and Chiefdoms shared various characteristics in common while they also had many other traits that differentiated both forms of political organization. While the confederacies mainly had various constituencies brought under one leadership, such as various tribes being unified under one leader, the chiefdoms mainly entailed the political organization of a single community (Johansen, 2005). Therefore, this discussion seeks to investigate the comparison and contrasts between the Confederacies and Chiefdoms in the Eastern North America, with a view to understanding the number of people under each form of political organization, the nature of their powers and the reasons behind the formations. There were three main confederacies that inhabited the Eastern North America, namely the Hurons, the Iroquois and the Powhattans (Johnson & Smith, 2003). The three confederacies took the form of having one single leader who was in charge of different tribes or communities that had been united to form a confederacy. The confederacies were mainly found in the regions of Southern Ontario, near lakes Ontario and Erie, where the Huron confederacy occupied, while the Iroquois confederacy occupied the central New York region and the Powhattans occupied the Chesapeake regions (Johansen, 2005). On the other hand, the chiefdoms were organizations of a single community under the leadership of their chiefs, who wielded much authority and powers over the people and established informal government structures, with their aides under them, who were responsible for overseeing the implementation of the chief’s authority by the different sections of the community. The chiefdoms occupied the major river ways of the Mississippi River hence their being referred to as the Mississippian chiefdoms (Milner, 2006). The advantages in both forms of political organization is that the coming together of tribes and communities gave the political organizations the strength to fight against their enemies as opposed to when they could fight as single tribes or communities. However, the disadvantage is that the political organizations allowed for the leaders to exploit their subjects since their word was the authority. Therefore, the subjects had to share the spoils of their hunting, gathering and agricultural exploits with the leaders, through paying such exploits as tribute to the leaders (Milner, 2006). The population estimate of the confederacies and the chiefdoms in the eastern North America region has been the subject of controversy between archeologists. However, there is an agreement between the archeologists, based on the archeological artifacts that have been discovered in this region, that hunting and gathering was the main social and economic activity of the people, while agriculture eventually developed especially in the chiefdoms found around the Mississippi area, as evidenced by traces of agricultural remains such as corn (Diaz-Granados & Duncan, 2004). Therefore, the political organizations were organized in the form of the paramount chief heading the confederacy or the chiefdom, who then had the diplomacy and trade powers to negotiate with the neighboring communities for the exchange of their hunting and agricultural products, while also determining the state of warfare necessary for the political organization (Milner, 2006). There is a general agreement between the archeologists regarding the population of the Powhatan confederacy and that of the Cahokia chiefdom, with estimating the population to be 14,000-21,000 for the Powhatan confederacy, and that of the Huron confederacy estimated to be between 20,000-25,000, while that of the Cahokia chiefdom was estimated at 30,000-40,000, by the thirteenth century (Milner, 2006). The major aspect of comparison between the confederacies and the chiefdoms is the fact that both forms of political organizations were established with the motive of defending territories (Diaz-Granados & Duncan, 2004). The size of the territory that was owned and occupied by a certain community, tribe or empire highly defined its superiority in the region (Johansen, 2005). Thus, most of the ancient communities valued territorial expansion as a major activity of the community, which would constantly fight against their neighboring communities to annex territories and thus expand theirs. The archeological artifacts found in the central New York region suggest that the early inhabitants of the region were warring communities since various kind of weaponry have been excavated in the region (Milner, 2006). Before the colonization of America by the Europeans, the Native American communities occupied specified territories, which they used as their bases for hunting and eventually agricultural activities. However, the communities constantly experienced the threats of territorial invasions and annexation by the neighboring communities which made the need to protect their territories fundamental (Diaz-Granados & Duncan, 2004). Therefore, both the confederacies and the chiefdoms were established with the main objective of uniting the people living within the territory so that they could fight against the external aggression by the other communities, who threatened to invade and annex some of their territories. The other similarity between the Confederacies and Chiefdoms is the fact that both political organizations concentrated the tools of political powers and authority under one main leader, mostly the chief. Therefore, the chiefs were the main symbols of authority within these political organizations, who ruled the communities through his aides (Milner, 2006). The chiefs had the powers to take any action against any individual within such communities, who they deemed were a threat to the peaceful coexistence of the community or whom they though threatened to destabilize the political organization. The chiefs had absolute powers on their subjects, which was exercised through the chiefs’ aides and the community warring and defense unit, which comprised the young men from the community who had been recruited as warriors and soldiers to protect their communities (Johansen, 2005). The aides and the warriors also served the internal functions of ensuring that the authority of the chief was felt and implemented to the letter by the members of the confederacies and the chiefdoms. However, there are many aspects of the two forms of political organization, which differentiates them. The reason behind the formation of the confederacy and the chiefdoms is different. First, the major difference between the confederacies and the chiefdoms is the societies or communities that constituted each form of political organization. While the confederacies were mainly established by the warring communities and tribes, the chiefdoms were mainly formed by the rather peaceful hunter and gathering communities (Milner, 2006). For example, the Iroquois confederacy was established by 5 different Iroquois tribes, which had experienced the inter-tribal wars for long, and thus wanted to unite as a peace making effort while also using the formation of the confederacy as a strategy to strengthen them and thus enable them to fight their enemies (Johnson & Smith, 2003). This presents the major point of contrast between the confederacies and the chiefdom political organizations being the reasons behind their establishment. While the chiefdoms were established to consolidate their powers and authority under one main leader, who guided the community and thus helped to establish a system of leadership and order in the society, the confederacies were established as a peace-making effort while also strengthening the uniting tribes or communities, against their enemies (Diaz-Granados & Duncan, 2004). References Diaz-Granados, C., & Duncan, J. R. (2004). The rock-art of eastern North America: Capturing images and insight. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Johansen, B. E. (2005). The Native peoples of North America: A history. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press. Johnson, M., & Smith, J. (2003). Tribes of the Iroquois confederacy: [...]. Oxford [u.a.: Osprey. Milner, G. R. (2006). The Cahokia chiefdom: The archaeology of a Mississippian society. Gainesville: University press of Florida. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Confederacies and Chiefdoms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Confederacies and Chiefdoms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1471893-confederacies-and-chiefdoms
(Confederacies and Chiefdoms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Confederacies and Chiefdoms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1471893-confederacies-and-chiefdoms.
“Confederacies and Chiefdoms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1471893-confederacies-and-chiefdoms.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Confederacies and Chiefdoms

The Chiefdoms of Powhattan and Ukaguru

chiefdoms Customer Inserts His/Her Name Customer Inserts Grade Course Customer Inserts 14 March 2012 chiefdoms chiefdoms are small government units.... Harmony, order, peace, loyalty, cooperation prevailed over the chiefdoms.... The research focuses on the sociopolitical organization and structure (hierarchy, class, leadership, etc....
3 Pages (750 words) Term Paper

The Confederacys Defeat in the Civil War

When it comes to the issue of the Confederacy's defeat in the Civil War, there are several factors in particular which need to be discussed.... The American Civil War is a war which took place between the years of 1861-1865, and it is considered as being one of the most major wars in the history of America....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Anthropological Approach to Chiefdoms

The anthropological approach to researching a given culture relies on the In looking cultures such as the early Christian chiefdoms in Ireland where the evidence is not clearly established, the anthropological approach allows for the use of research from a variety of resources to be utilized in creating a concept of the nature of the culture.... In Ireland, according to the research and information gathered by anthropologists and archaeologists, after the spread of Christianity through the nation, there still existed a series of chiefdoms under which the rule of the land was governed....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Pre-Colombian Society and Northern South American Chiefdoms

This paper seeks to explain how the chiefdoms of Pre-Colombian Caribbean were closely related to those of Northern South America than Mesoamerica.... Early chiefdoms were formed to ensure the availability of farming land and maintain territorial control.... The chiefdoms of the Pre-Colombian Caribbean were closely related to those of Northern South America.... The intermediate area was made up of different societies that were ruled by different chiefdoms....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Social Structure of a Chiefdom

The structures that were created from these systems are manifold; they include bands, tribes, states and chiefdoms.... There is a variance of simplicity and complexity in different chiefdoms occasioned by reasons such as scale of development, financial capability and the orientation to a person or groups.... chiefdoms are slightly different, especially with respect to political, cultural and economical principles.... ccording to the societal structure of chiefdoms, they mainly comprise of clans, lineages, and other important groups....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Why Mississippians Could not Make Progress from their Initial Good Work

Offspring of the great American Indian confederacies of the American southland together with so-called Five Civilized Tribes are profoundly linked with their Mississippian heritage (Thomas, 1999, pp.... The paper 'Why Mississippians Could not Make Progress from their Initial Good Work' presents the Mississippi river which is the largest river system in North America flowing through states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Comparison of the Tribal and Chiefdom Societies

Thirdly, the division of labor is not developed in tribal societies compared to chiefdoms.... This work called "Comparison of the Tribal and Chiefdom Societies" describes several differences between chiefdom and tribal societies in relation to technology and economy.... The author outlines division of labor, social stratification, political organization, kinship, gender relations, religious organizations, and ideology....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Social Structure of Chiefdom

chiefdoms consist of a socio-cultural system which is mainly centralized for the purpose of decision making.... The families in chiefdoms are mainly extended families, with many generations.... Post marriage is allowed to take place within the chiefdoms.... chiefdoms are mainly characterized by polygamous marriage, where chiefs are allowed to marry more than one wife.... Scupin also observes that chiefdoms are mainly gender-based and are dominated by the males in the form of gerontocracy....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us