StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Often, most transformational changes are met with the need to have experienced change managers coach senior management on how to manage resistance to change. It is usually presumed that resistance is an inherent by-product of change…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change"

? Arguments for and against resistance to change inserts his/her s Department’s Date Often, most transformational changes are met with the need to have experienced change managers coach senior management on how to manage resistance to change. It is usually presumed that resistance is an inherent by-product of change. With evidence of companies failing to change owing to resistance by employees, it is no wonder that organizations invest great time and resources to conduct training and coaching in order to reduce resistance to change. While there are strong arguments that support this view, there are various reasons to prove that managing resistance to change may, in fact, may not be a good idea always. One reason why resistance to change may be productive is that it prevents bad/wrong ideas from being assimilated in the organization. Employee resistance to change allows firms to rethink “why” they are changing. In other words, it allows leadership to reconsider the business case for change with a critical perspective. If all employees agreed and there was no resistance, clearly management could oversee the ‘downside’ of changing making it unprofitable for the firm in the long run. Furthermore, because resistance to change often comprises of the fear factor (including loss of status, power or even job for employees), it encourages the top management to discover the impact that change would have on the ‘people’. Therefore, resistance to change is essential in the sense that it allows management to develop an open-ended view of change and consider the drawbacks of change. By doing so, managers can then come up with policies and procedures to counter the drawbacks and make change more workable and feasible for employees. Furthermore, the fact that resistance is seen as a “problem” to change leads management to derive strategies to overcome rather than engage it. Managers may often go at length to reduce the ‘threat’ of resistance and, in doing so, may adopt tactics that may be harmful to the organization. As a result, it is common to find management taking on an overly defensive role in trying to push the change too hard as well as become overly protective of their status in trying to win the argument against disgruntled employees (Watson, 1982). This occurs because management views resistance to change as a reactive process in which agents possessing power oppose the reactions of other agents (Jermier et al., 1994). This leads them into an evitable trap whereby the management becomes overly concerned with protecting their position and argument rather than listening to what the disgruntled employees have to say. As a result, communication is reduced and the situation evolves into a manager-employee conflict. This stems from the fact that managers may alienate employees who are seen as obstacles rather than resources for change. Consequently, this conflict results in loss of reputation and poor relationships with employees, thereby reducing the morale of employees. Additionally, managing resistance to change often brings with the incorrect assumption that resistance is a one-sided phenomenon. Managers may become overly simplistic to assume that resistance is caused only by the attitudes and behaviors of employees. In fact, many models, such as three dimensional model of change, are based on the inherent assumption that resistance is solely the product of the behavior, emotions and attitudes of the employees (Hayes, 2010). Under this view, managers attempt to see the resistors as irrational and self-centered and consequently, try to block their interference in the change process. Although this true, resistance to change can be attributed partially to the way in which the organization is bringing about change and the behavior of managers in this respect. Therefore, managers who hold this view often ignore the fact that resistance to change is, in fact, feedback and that it must not be blocked or reduced but dealt with appropriately. Other studies have also warned management to stop viewing resistance to change a necessarily negative outcome. For one thing, it is argued that, managers can often overlook fundamentally correct criticisms of change in an effort to reduce employee resistance to change. Managers may be so overwhelmed with the process of change and managing any possible resistance that they may overlook flaws or shortcomings of the change initiative. Treating negative comments regarding the change process as resistance can cause managers to conveniently dismiss them without considering the hidden truth behind them (Piderit, 2000). These managers focus instead on treating the resistors rather than the flawed change process. In some cases, the failure to change is often conveniently attributed to employees’ resistance to change or failure to manage such resistance when, in fact, it is caused by the faulty change process itself (Krantz, 1999). On the other end of the spectrum, it is argued that managing resistance to change is quintessential. This is because resistance to change often transcends the realm of positivity when employees deliberately avoid tasks, resign, become hostile or reduce their productivity (Feldman, 1972). This is often accompanied by other tactics such as increased absenteeism, frustration and sabotage (Plate & Stone, 1974). This is where the strongest argument in favor of managing resistance to change sets in- employee resistance to change can reduce the productivity, goodwill as well as profits of the organization, therefore, this resistance must be reduced. Employees may use resistance to change as a tool for getting the attention of top management towards addressing issues that need to be addressed to guarantee superior performance of the business. In this case, it becomes necessary to manage the resistance because it is in the best interests of the organization and, as stakeholders, managers are bound to advance the interests of the organization. It is important to resolve issues arising out of resistance (such as strikes etc.) since they can culminate in a virtual failure of the company. Since employees are a valuable asset for any firm, managing their concerns, and resistance to change, is quintessential to ensure smooth sailing of the business. Furthermore, resistance may be subtle or covert; in other words, change may not elicit any prominent and obvious resistance. Employees may comply with change initiatives on the face of it but may be inertly resistant to change. In other words, they may be forcibly embracing the change which they really do not want. In such cases, a forced change cannot bring about lasting benefits for the organization. Unless employees do not identify with the objectives and values of the organization as well as the reason for change, the change initiative will not be successful. In such cases, it becomes important for the management to step in and reduce the communication barrier in order to elicit the trust and loyalty of employees. Communication also serves the purpose of reminding leadership that they need to reconcile their views with employees regarding change (Lewis, 2006). Therefore, managing resistance to change becomes inevitable in this context. To conclude, over emphasis on managing to resistance to change in recent years has led management to become short-sighted and fix the perpetrators of such resistance rather than the change process itself. Furthermore, such an aggressive perspective against the perpetrators of resistance can result in management overlooking the criticisms of the change process. In short, rather than viewing resistance as a natural phenomenon whose purpose is to provide feedback, management often ends up viewing resistance as a negative force to be managed or curbed. This reduces the scope for opportunities for improvement in the change process. Although resistance may warrant immediate action in the case of strikes, resignations or reduced productivity, it must be managed tactfully and open-mindedly. Communication may be the key to ensuring that resistance is ‘effectively’ managed as temporarily forcing employees to accept change half-heartedly will only harm the business in the long run. References Feldman, N.G., 1972. Pride in heritage-or resentment?: A sociologist analyzes library staff reaction. Wilson Library Bulletin, 46(January), pp.436-40. Hayes, J., 2010. The Theory and Practice of Change Management. 3rd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Jermier, J.M., Knights, D. & Nord, W.R., 1994. Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge. Krantz, J., 1999. Comment on "challenging 'resistance to change'". Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 35(1), pp.42-44. Lewis, L.K., 2006. Employee perspectives on implementation communication as predictors of perceptions of success and resistance. Western Journal of Communication, 70(1), pp.23-46. Piderit, S.K., 2000. RETHINKING RESISTANCE AND RECOGNIZING AMBIVALENCE: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL VIEW OF ATTITUDES TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE. Academy of Management Beview, 25(4), pp.783-94. Plate, K.H. & Stone, E.W., 1974. Factors affecting librarians' job satisfaction: a report of two studies. The Library Quarterly, 44(April), pp.97-110. Watson, T.J., 1982. Group ideologies and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 19, p.259–275. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1489276-what-are-the-key-arguments-for-and-against
(Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change Essay)
https://studentshare.org/management/1489276-what-are-the-key-arguments-for-and-against.
“Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1489276-what-are-the-key-arguments-for-and-against.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change

The Problem of Superbugs

He died from tuberculosis, which was already treatable during that time,… His medieval end has been the modern end for many people dying from infectious diseases because of antimicrobial resistance.... Furthermore, antimicrobial resistance is not only a national problem because it can soon develop into a global national health issue without immediate and long-term national and international collaboration.... Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is not a new healthcare problem....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

The Case against Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience involves nonviolent resistance to the ‘unjust' governing laws by certain members of the community to which… The late Martin Luther King is one of the prominent leaders who actively held to the philosophy of non-violent resistance, in the 1950s, in his fight for a ‘just system' for the Negro community.... According to Storing (89), Malcolm X was equally against nonviolence resistance arguing that ‘there's no such thing as nonviolent revolution…' and explaining that ‘revolution is bloody, revolution is hostile, revolution knows no compromise, revolution overturns and destroys everything that gets in its way'....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Foreign Policy Change

Legro presented some arguments related tithe change in the foreign policy of the United States.... He explained that a change in collective ideas is inherently conflictual and political, but a focus on the situation of the contingent politics in which continuity is likely or it is not properly defined.... In this book, Legro presented some arguments despite knowing the importance of ideational transformations by scholars and policy makers.... … There are some arguments presented by Legro on the major strategic turning points in the United States....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Implementing Change Paper

Managers manage the situation with their different managerial skills and convince their subordinates about the change in the department.... Any change need proper communication.... Managers communicate different reasons of change in the department.... Any change is uncertain and there is a fear of unknown related with that.... change is the only constant thing.... There are different steps through which managers successfully handle staff's resistance...
4 Pages (1000 words) Admission/Application Essay

The Evolution of Drug Resistance in Viruses and Bacteria

Professionals in the medical field remain alarmed by the discovery that some viruses and bacteria have developed resistance to drugs and further evolved through mutations or DNA alterations.... The paper "The Evolution of Drug resistance in Viruses and Bacteria" observes that half a century ago antibiotics were suggested as a panacea from many infections.... hellip; The rise in the frequency of drug resistance in viruses and bacteria is notable in many drugs....
5 Pages (1250 words) Literature review

Leadership & Change

These are people who can analyze think and develop the behavioral changes that can influence the individuals who bring the resistance to change (Mullins, 2010, pg.... Whenever these individuals scrutinize the reasons that are behind the LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE By of school I agree with Mullin's point of view because different individuals normally respond differently to change.... Some people embrace change and accept the challenges and opportunities that come with it....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

Managing Resistance to Change

n examining managing resistance to change, the systems thinking approach is the model that allows for the best possible outcome through the most organizational structures.... The author states that the methods for creating the best environment for change are through the systems thinking approach, providing for a framework in which to create the best possible circumstances in which to implement change.... However, within the change information are the best possible tools for a manager … The author states that the methods for creating the best environment for change are through the systems thinking approach, providing for a framework in which to create the best possible circumstances in which to implement change....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Rogerian Argument Articles Analysis

Not all arguments assume that scholars or readers will make a yes or no, innocent, or guilty decision.... hellip; Most arguments are built towards a consensus.... The paper "Rogerian Argument Articles Analysis" focuses on the critical analysis of the main articles devoted to the Rogerian Argument....
5 Pages (1250 words) Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us