StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Peter Singer - Rethinking Life and Death - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Peter Singer - Rethinking Life and Death" discusses that Peter Singer could be regarded as a philosopher who has stirred controversies in the contemporary philosophical world. His controversial advocacy of infanticide, euthanasia had made controversial headlines…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Peter Singer - Rethinking Life and Death
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Peter Singer - Rethinking Life and Death"

Singer as a philosopher had a distinctive perception of life and death. He believed that every person has the right to decide whether to live or not. However, I strongly disagree with his idea of infanticide where an innocent soul will be killed against the will of God.

Killing a person at any stage of his life is a crime. There can be no sufficient reasons for killing a person whether he is disabled, unborn, or handicapped. Singer being a philosopher failed to understand the divine essence of the human soul. So it could be easier for him to argue towards infanticide because he considers infants as just a creature. Infanticide is a matter of moral crime on whichever ground it may be committed. The very simple logical reason against infanticide is that killing a person by another person is utter cruelty. Nature has given us this precious life and only nature has the right to take it back.

A person is born because he has the right to live. Human intervention in the life of a person is strongly unrecommended. When God has decided to create a being, he wants that being to live and experience life. Life is a gift of God, hence it should be treated with respect and dignity. It is valuable for the infant that he is born as it is his destiny. Every person has a soul in him, right from the beginning of his conception. The soul is divine and should be allowed to live its life. According to Hindu philosophy, a soul could take a body with disability and limitations as per its deeds in a past life. So it has to undergo all the pain and suffering of its disabled life as this is its fate.

Who has given us the right to take a life, just because an infant is in the growing stage does not mean that it is less of a human being. Singer is definitely unethical in suggesting infanticide as a means to avoid the existence of a disabled person. If an infant were to ask whether to live or die, then definitely it will want life. Then what gives the right for Singer to advocate the killing of infants. He cannot separate from who may be lived or who may be killed. Infanticide is wrong because even if the biological parents don’t want the baby, other people do. Destroying a life only for one’s selfish motive is ignorance, cruelty, and immoral.

Infants are to be protected and not destroyed. They should be allowed to live in whatever condition they are and not be disturbed in their natural course of life. The singer has a view that newborns are non –person and hence killing them is not unethical. But every human being was an infant once and if it were destroyed in the budding stage how would have people existed. Infanticide can be categorized as crueler because an innocent being, who just entered earth is being destroyed for selfish motives of people. We cannot kill an infant just for the convenience of certain people. One life should respect another life as well as God and Nature. Singer even argues that all life is not the same in all and this is totally wrong because the entire people have a soul of an equal divine value.

To kill an infant means depriving it of all the opportunities to enjoy life and experience the growth process. Singer being a philosopher has a moral right to spread love and compassion among humanity. He should think for the welfare of people rather than the destruction of it. I strongly disagree with Singer as I believe infants need all the care and attention from parents whether he is healthy or disabled. Killing a life is an atrocious deed and this thought in itself is an evil tendency. I believe that an infant should be allowed to live freely in society and should be given all the support from their family members. Finally, I can assert that Singer is inhumane and immoral in advocating infanticide as it is a social crime.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Choose a point in singer(rethinking life and death) that you strongly Essay”, n.d.)
Choose a point in singer(rethinking life and death) that you strongly Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1438131-choose-a-point-in-singerrethinking-life-and-death
(Choose a Point in singer(rethinking Life and Death) That You Strongly Essay)
Choose a Point in singer(rethinking Life and Death) That You Strongly Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1438131-choose-a-point-in-singerrethinking-life-and-death.
“Choose a Point in singer(rethinking Life and Death) That You Strongly Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1438131-choose-a-point-in-singerrethinking-life-and-death.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Peter Singer - Rethinking Life and Death

A Philosophical Review of Nature's and Animal Rights

However, if domestic species do not have biological interests, it is still possible that they have inherent or intrinsic worth as shown by the arguments of Paul Taylor, Tom Regan, and peter singer.... Likewise, peter singer claim that if a nonhuman animal has a particular feature, like biological inter...
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Should Euthanasia Be Legalized Responding to Peter Singers Taking Life: Humans

More specifically, it is not the right to die but the right to choose between life and death.... Rather, it is high time people abandoned their commitment to the sanctity of life and assumed a new picture of reality, in which suffering and pain impedes the development of progressive society and in which only euthanasia has a potential to give people another chance to become happy (Singer, 1993).... A convinced utilitarian, in Taking Life: Humans peter singer presents his vision of the euthanasia problem....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Speciesism in Humans

It would be worth exploring the viewpoints of peter singer and Holmes Rolston with regard to the last redwood remaining on this earth and how they would have preferred to deal with this enigma.... Speciesism in Humans peter singer argues that human beings since their beginning have indulged into speciesism – a domineering human behavior over nonhumans and that needs to be condemned.... Using other Animals as Food peter singer calls human beings speciesists having a sole intention of dominating other species on this earth....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Kants Categorical Imperative and Singers Views on the Eating Animals

According to peter singer, we should not sacrifice major interest to satisfy minor interest.... According to singer, we must not act so as to sacrifice a major interest for a minor interest.... Explain how this affects singer's views on the eating animals and use of them in experiments and his views on abortion and euthanasia.... The philosophy of peter Singler is very interesting and unique....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Survival Lottery By John Harris

The Survival Lottery is an experiment in thought whose proponent is John Harris.... The core of the idea is to ask people to imagine if organ donations were expected to save more individuals than it would kill.... Haris states that hypothetically all healthy individuals are assigned a unique number and drawn under a lottery whenever a donation is required(Harris,1986)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Peter Singer and John Arthur: Analysis of Their Works

Even individuals do not care to donate any sizeable amount to help the starving for whom the donation is a difference between life and death.... Extending the argument further Singer says that if a child were drowning and there were many people around standing and watching, it would This may result in getting muddy and the clothes wet, but the fact that it has saved a life is justification enough.... He relates this apathy to a type of murder and that people have come to take human life for granted....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Euthanasia and Infanticide

is book, rethinking life and death, conveyed his views on life, on the importance of human beings, and how life itself can be dealt with.... He had authored several high- profile writings that had critics question his peter singer: On Euthanasia, Abortion, and Infanticide Life is one that is considered sacred.... Though his stance on these issues is met by harsh critiques, peter singer reiterates that the decision to condone and commit is yet subjected to individual preference and decision making....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Singer Solution to World Poverty

This essay "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" presents peter singer who has put forth his views in his own style.... roper investigations about the means need to be made by the individual before embarking upon action, especially when it concerns the life, growth, and sentiments of an individual.... (The singer.... singer poses a question, what would have the position, if Dora is to ignore the advice and would argue that that is the only choice left for her to acquire a color TV, others have it, he is the street-kid....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us