StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period - Report Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period" tells us about nature and the place of the mind and body. The Cartesian explanation proposes that the nature and place of the mind and body that every human being possesses, with the obvious exceptions of infants and the mentally challenged, are different…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.9% of users find it useful
History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period"

Gilbert Ryle argues that Descartes philosophy is deeply flawed because it commits what he calls a "category mistake." Explain Ryles reasoning for this conclusion. Do you think Ryles argument is successful? Why or why not? The Cartesian explanation that proposes that the nature and place of the mind and body that every human being possesses, with the obvious exceptions of infants and the mentally challenged, are different and separate from each other is what Ryle considers to be the Official Doctrine. Descartes proposed that while the former is private and internal, the latter is of public domain and is external. This is explained by the theory that the body occupies space and is observable by the senses just like other external entities (like a chair, another person or a dog). The mind, on the other hand, does not occupy space and cannot be ascertained by any other individual aside from the self. For instance, a person can see whether the other person next to him is wearing a jacket or not. The observations gathered by the senses are situated in space and is open for everybody else to perceive. But the mind and its processes are kept totally in confidential from other people. However, it is through the physical that another human being can indirectly affect and communicate with the mind of another. Thus, it can be concluded that a person has two separate and different states of being—the mental and physical existence. Having presented what Ryle considers to be the Official Doctrine, I will now present what I think is his strongest argument against it. He stated that a category mistake has been made by Descartes and other dualists that make dualism totally absurd. In order to fully understand Ryle’s argument, it is imperative to define what a category mistake is according to him. Simply put, it is the act of wrongly placing, labeling, and treating two things as if they both belong in a common category due to the inability to attach the appropriate meanings into words and concepts. To illustrate this, Ryle cited a very simple yet clear example of committing a category mistake. Towards the end of a military parade where a certain division is marching on the street and have been labeled as battalions, batteries, and squadrons, the child then asked “Where is the division?” This is a category mistake as the child unknowingly placed the division in the same category as the battalions, batteries and squadrons, when in fact; those three comprise the division. Ryle argued that this is what Descartes and the other dualists have done in a sense that they have classified the mind and body as two different and separate entities in the same category—parts of a human being—when in fact it should not be. The first two arguments of Ryle I believe are the strongest in their simplicity. The first one states that since no one knows the workings of one mind, but the owner and mental processes are undisclosed, then it cannot be assumed that it is governed by non-mechanical laws as opposed to the mechanical laws governing the body. No one is privy to how the minds of another works so there is no way for anyone to formulate a general principle regarding it, which is what Descartes did when he assumed that the mind is governed by non-mechanical laws. In line with this, Ryle makes his second point. He explained that assuming that the mind is governed by non-mechanical laws is tantamount to saying that it runs through the same rigid deterministic system like mechanical laws do. This then is in conflict with the concept of Free Will as it characterizes the mind, just like the body, as determined in nature. The body cannot help but go through the different processes of the body (i.e. secretion and menstruation) for it is needed for it to function normally. However, this is not the case with the mind. The mind is in control of the nature of Free Will and it is not deterministic in nature. Again, since nobody knows for sure the inner workings of another’s mind, then no generalities could be drawn. Therefore, the mind cannot be considered as having the same characteristics as the body and they should not be treated like two different sides of a coin. This is because the mind and body are not separate entities in which the ghost independently operates the machine. The mind and body are one and the former should be treated as a means of explaining and understanding the actions of the latter. With the two arguments presented, it is clear that a category mistake was committed in creating the theory of dualism. Although Ryle presented other more complex arguments moving towards his conclusion, these two very simple points that he made I believe are the most successful. One does not have to be a theorist or a philosopher to be able to understand them. And I would have to agree with Ryle that it is only but logical to discredit the theory of dualism. Explain in your own words Russells distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Apply the distinction to the knowledge that one might possess of the existence of a chair, for example. Bertrand Russell proposed that knowledge can be classified into two: the knowledge of things and the knowledge of truths. On the one hand, knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description are the two kinds of knowledge of things. Russell explained that the former is a lot simpler than the latter in that knowledge by acquaintance consists of what we perceive through our senses—what we are acquainted with that we can immediately become aware of—and is the foundation of all our knowledge. For instance, when presented with a chair, I become acquainted with its color, shape, and texture—the sense-data that make up the chair. Sense-data is not the only basis for all knowledge by acquaintance. There is also acquaintance by memory, which is the source of all our knowledge about what has already happened—what is in the past. We remember whatever we have experienced and perceived through our senses and we keep them in our memory to use them as points of inference when making sense of the descriptions of an object. Acquaintance by introspection is another type and this pertains to the knowledge that we have in being aware that we are aware of things. For instance, I am aware that I am seeing a chair. Russell posits that this self-consciousness of our thoughts and feelings is the basis for our knowledge of mental things. Hence, there are two things that I am acquainted with upon seeing the chair: the sense-date that is presented by the chair made possible through my outer senses and my knowledge of myself as the one seeing the chair through my inner senses. In relation to this, Russell adds that we are also acquainted with universals—abstract ideas like motherhood, blackness, and uniformity. However, my knowledge that this chair, as a physical and separate thing, exists is knowledge by description. It is our knowledge of the thing itself that we have perceived in that there is this exact physical and external object which causes the sense-data. For instance, I know that George W. Bush is the President of the United States. By replacing Bush’s name with his characteristics as a president, I am drawing upon knowledge by description in knowing that President Bush exists even though I have not met him personally and I only have an abstract description (greatness, braveness, and leadership) of him being a great and brave leader. In this sense, Russell explains that knowledge by description consists of knowledge of truths as “we know a description, and we know that there is just one object to which this description applies, though the object itself is not directly known to us.” We can see here that knowledge by description draws from what we are acquainted with. Explain Moores proof of the external world. Explain why or why not Moore would agree with the claim that he also needs to prove the premise of his argument. G. E. Moore’s proof of the external world, that is, objects outside the self, relies on his own two hands—literally. He explained that if he can generate two hands just by raising and moving them, then it can be logically concluded that two hands exist. He then explained that the existence of hands alone is a proof that an external world exists, assuming that the hands are part of the external world. However there is much opposition to his argument. One is that Moore’s theory draws only on sensory data. He did not even consider on his senses as significant to the argument in that it should be clarified if the senses are gathering data correctly and truthfully, without deception as reflected by Descartes. He assumed that his senses were correct and not deceptive in perceiving the existence of his two hands. However, I believe the most crucial contention against Moore’s theory is the fact that, like Descartes, he presented an argument that can be characterized as circular in that he based the truth of the proof of the existence of the external world upon the knowledge that there are objects outside of the self. It creates an Epistemic Circle in that the premise of his argument is the thing itself that he is trying to prove. Stating that the hands are objects outside the self that can prove the existence of the external world is the same as stating that we know there is an external world because we know there is an external world. In this case, Moore then needs to prove the premise of his argument in order to prove the point of the argument as both are just one and the same. For Moore, there are certain truisms that everyone knows as true and can be considered general knowledge. For instance, everyone knows that the earth has existed far longer that before we were born—I know this; you know this; and I know that you know this. The general knowledge of these truisms and their truths are considered by Moore as common-sense. Hence, even with the glaring exposition that Moore has created a circular argument, I believe that he would still argue that he would not need to prove the premise of his argument because it would be just “common-sense” to believe that hands do exist and that therefore, it follows that an external world also exists. Read More

Sense-data is not the only basis for all knowledge by acquaintance. There is also acquaintance by memory, which is the source of all our knowledge about what has already happened—what is in the past. We remember whatever we have experienced and perceived through our senses and we keep them in our memory to use them as points of inference when making sense of the descriptions of an object. Acquaintance by introspection is another type and this pertains to the knowledge that we have in being aware that we are aware of things.

For instance, I am aware that I am seeing a chair. Russell posits that this self-consciousness of our thoughts and feelings is the basis for our knowledge of mental things. Hence, there are two things that I am acquainted with upon seeing the chair: the sense-date that is presented by the chair made possible through my outer senses and my knowledge of myself as the one seeing the chair through my inner senses. In relation to this, Russell adds that we are also acquainted with universals—abstract ideas like motherhood, blackness, and uniformity.

However, my knowledge that this chair, as a physical and separate thing, exists is knowledge by description. It is our knowledge of the thing itself that we have perceived in that there is this exact physical and external object which causes the sense-data. For instance, I know that George W. Bush is the President of the United States. By replacing Bush’s name with his characteristics as a president, I am drawing upon knowledge by description in knowing that President Bush exists even though I have not met him personally and I only have an abstract description (greatness, braveness, and leadership) of him being a great and brave leader.

In this sense, Russell explains that knowledge by description consists of knowledge of truths as “we know a description, and we know that there is just one object to which this description applies, though the object itself is not directly known to us.” We can see here that knowledge by description draws from what we are acquainted with. Explain Moores proof of the external world. Explain why or why not Moore would agree with the claim that he also needs to prove the premise of his argument. G. E.

Moore’s proof of the external world, that is, objects outside the self, relies on his own two hands—literally. He explained that if he can generate two hands just by raising and moving them, then it can be logically concluded that two hands exist. He then explained that the existence of hands alone is a proof that an external world exists, assuming that the hands are part of the external world. However there is much opposition to his argument. One is that Moore’s theory draws only on sensory data.

He did not even consider on his senses as significant to the argument in that it should be clarified if the senses are gathering data correctly and truthfully, without deception as reflected by Descartes. He assumed that his senses were correct and not deceptive in perceiving the existence of his two hands. However, I believe the most crucial contention against Moore’s theory is the fact that, like Descartes, he presented an argument that can be characterized as circular in that he based the truth of the proof of the existence of the external world upon the knowledge that there are objects outside of the self.

It creates an Epistemic Circle in that the premise of his argument is the thing itself that he is trying to prove. Stating that the hands are objects outside the self that can prove the existence of the external world is the same as stating that we know there is an external world because we know there is an external world. In this case, Moore then needs to prove the premise of his argument in order to prove the point of the argument as both are just one and the same. For Moore, there are certain truisms that everyone knows as true and can be considered general knowledge.

For instance, everyone knows that the earth has existed far longer that before we were born—I know this; you know this; and I know that you know this.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 2, n.d.)
History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 2. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1707659-history-of-western-philosophy-modern-period
(History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words - 2)
History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words - 2. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1707659-history-of-western-philosophy-modern-period.
“History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words - 2”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1707659-history-of-western-philosophy-modern-period.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF History of Western Philosophy: Modern Period

The influnce of Socrates and Plato on ancient philosophy and modern western philosophy

Socrates was a philosopher of ancient Greece who is acknowledged for establishing the basics of modern western philosophy.... Socrates has had a vast influence on ancient Greek or, generally, on western philosophy, together with apprentices Plato and Aristotle.... Socrates was a philosopher of ancient Greece who is acknowledged for establishing the basics of modern western philosophy.... Socrates has had a vast influence on ancient Greek or, generally, on western philosophy, together with apprentices Plato and Aristotle....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Emergence of Modern Europe

The usage of these ideas motivated a sense of western emergence into contemporary or modern times that had real and precise technical knowledge of this world.... The age of enlightenment, also known as the age of reason refers to the period of intellectual awakening known as enlightenment (Lindberg, 2008, p.... From the viewpoint of socio-political phenomena, the enlightenment period is believed to have started close with the thirty years of wars and came to an end after the French revolution....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Medieval Philosophy / History

Philosophy 309 and 310 Learning Narrative In this prior learning narrative, I will discuss the broad knowledge I have gained throughout my lifetime concerning the history of western philosophy.... The courses that I am petitioning for in this narrative are as follows: Philosophy 309, history of western philosophy I: Ancient to Medieval and Philosophy 310: Modern Philosophy.... During this period of transition, I sought to discover my purpose in life; as well as discover some of life's most difficult questions, such as “what is happiness?...
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

A History of Modern Psychology

A history of Modern Psychology Name: Instructor: Task: Date: A history of Modern Psychology Modern psychology originated from the 19th century philosophy or earlier.... One can relate the modern psychology discipline with the beginning of psychology by identifying the roles of the past philosophers.... Consequently, it is vital to mention the role of the past philosophers from the western culture when discussing the contemporary philosophy....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

What is Augustinian political philosophy

he second important question of political philosophy of the Medieval period is that of the essence of human happiness.... n general the whole political philosophy of the Medieval.... We can observe connection between philosophy and political philosophy, which is due to the fact that philosophy is always influenced and even changed but policy as it exists in society, in Medieval political philosophy focused on several primary questions....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Western Civilization: Origins and Rise of Science and Cosmology

The history of science is a part of the history of human culture, and has its roots in the remote past (Sedgwick 3), going back to the origins of human society.... The key to understanding the history of science lies in the interaction between the theoretical and practical activities of man.... , while modern scientific development is believed to have started only from the end of the 15th century.... he birth of modern science was based on two concepts: the organized conceptualizing of the priest or philosopher, along with the practical functioning of the craftsman....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Islamic Philosophy Influence on Western Philosophy in 10th Century and Onwards

eeping in view the commencement of the incorporation of Islamic philosophical ideas in the realm of western philosophy, Hourani (1989, p.... The author of this paper "Islamic Philosophy Influence on western philosophy in 10th Century and Onwards" discusses the foundations of Islamic and western philosophy, how Islamic philosophers emerged as a source of guidance, inspiration, and influence for their Western contemporaries and students.... 5), while the role of Muslim philosophy in shaping the beliefs of western thinkers is attributable to several factors, the primary influence can be assessed in terms of the humanistic element of Islamic philosophy which was transferred into the perceptions of western thinkers....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Are Westerns Simply American Myths, Or Can They Be Read as Contributions to Political Philosophy

Throughout history, the values and customs of western culture have been brought about from political thinking and reasoning.... tradition of rationalism has also made an important contribution to western civilization, this tradition has its origin from ancient times, then to the middle ages, and then to the renaissance period further on in various spheres of life.... "Are Westerns Simply American Myths, Or Can They Be Read as Contributions to Political philosophy" paper argues that the great westerns make an essential contribution to the field of political philosophy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us