StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Production of Knowledge - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper 'The Production of Knowledge' tells that Knowledge refers to facts, pieces of information, or skills acquired by an individual through practical experience or learning. It is the familiarity or awareness of a fact, event, or situation. It is defined by two antagonizing elements: accuracy and error…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Production of Knowledge"

Student’s Name Course Instructor Date Submitted Error Is As Valuable As Accuracy in the Production of Knowledge Knowledge refers to facts, pieces of information or skills acquired by an individual through practical experience or learning. It is the familiarity or awareness of a fact, event or situation. The process of gaining knowledge is two sided. It is defined by two antagonizing elements: accuracy and error. Accuracy is the chance that the source of knowledge is relevant, truthful, and purposeful and techniques used to obtain the knowledge are effective. The error comes in with the character of mistakes, and in most cases, it leads to the attainment of wrong facts or information. But who knows? As the question unfolds, “Error is as valuable as accuracy in the production of knowledge.” This statement is very true considering the significance of an error in unfolding the wrong sides. In the production of knowledge, one has to understand the both the wrong and the right at the same time. Accuracy directly affects the value of the knowledge generated from a given source. It encompasses the techniques applied, quality and appropriateness of the information. A full assessment of accuracy a knowledge generation process requires an evaluation of the magnitude of all possible sources of error, especially in experimental knowledge. The value of knowledge defines its applicability and reliability in different circumstances. For instance, when handling a slippery matter involving the life of an individual, a lot of care need to be taken to ensure actions maintain a rhythm of safety. This is when accuracy comes into play by ensuring the piece of knowledge in life issues is utilized appropriately and for the right purpose and time. Assurance is an important aspect of knowledge production and utilization. Maintaining accurate data or facts boost the element of assurance when one is handling a situation or event because accurate information is precise and inclusive of all the requirements in producing the necessary knowledge. Once assured of the features or expectations of a fact, activity, or situation, one canbe described to be aptly knowledgeable on the subject matter. The philosophical understanding of the term “truth” as an ordinary discourse for beliefs to agree with the facts on the ground or to state what is rightfully the case highlights accuracy as a valuable asset in knowledge production. Beliefs can only match the facts when some sense of accuracy is put to play throughout the knowledge building process including experiments and practical engagements For something to become a knowledge or fact people must concede that it had been confirmed. This implies the practical aspect in the production of knowledge. Practical experience gives results based on the accuracy of the participants as well as the errors encountered in the process. Errors m either be inherent, induced or as result of sheer ignorance. However, in most cases, they are unforeseeable. The result of the error is significant in buffering knowledge just like accuracy. The difference is how they both help in knowledge production. While accuracy contributes directly to knowledge production, an error takes the indirect route. As goes the saying “once bitten, twice shy,” so is the route taken by an error in producing knowledge. People often learn from their daily mistakes but what drives the production of knowledge is the will to continue even after the mistake. An outstanding practical example on the significance of an error in knowledge is the case of Thomas Edison (the man who invented a bulb light). Edison made 1000 unsuccessful attempts before he finally came up with a working bulb. This implies that in all his previous steps, Edison had been making mistakes. That is 1000 errors. Logically, it would be argued the process of making a bulb or producing knowledge on how to make a lighting bulb can take 1001 different ways amongst which only one leads to the fact. The overall argument here is that many things that people know come as a result of at least one failed experiment that paves the way or uncovers the one way that is not appropriate. Learning process then begins from this point. Errors made during the trial to understand something, therefore, significant. Without making a mistake, one would hardly realize when something is not right or correct in the analysis of a phenomenon. Problem-solving which is a significant tenet in the production of knowledge normally seeks for accuracy before an error due to the direct approach of accuracy in knowledge production. However, it is undisputable to assert that mistakes and failure drive creativity, invention, and innovation in cases where accuracy can hardly be established. Knowledge is not just about reading, watching, feeling and listening to information from another party. Were this true, then there would be limitations on the development new knowledge,and equally, the total net gain in knowledge among individuals would be greatly reduced. What next? People, therefore, make as many relevant errors as possible in their quest for knowledge and understanding of new things, events and situations. In human daily duties or exploration of old knowledge, people normally have a tendency of asking “what if...?” The steps are always making an attempt by employing the old knowledge at the beginning. However, it sometimes turns out that the old concept is no longer applicable because things change with time and circumstances. After deviating from the old long-held knowledge probably because of an error, misconception or misunderstanding, the new pursuit open doors to an exclusively new area of knowledge that not been explored in the previous attempts. This implies that knowledge production is an unending process just like daily human challenges and their constructions. Trial and error is a method commonly used in the field of science. No standard of accuracy is emphasized although it involves a lot of knowledge production. The participants anticipate much of error than the accurate result. A clear example in support of this argument is the way curative drugs are tested for efficiency. Several clinical trials are conductedtodetermine what a drug can do in regards to the treatment of a particular illness. Efficiency is measured against the risk that the drug is likely to bedangerous, effective or ineffective in combating the illness. This is the starting point knowledge and adjustments are made based on the results. Both accuracy and error become very significant tools of knowledge in such a situation. Accuracy help to save the risk and to take caution while an error marks the turning point at which no relevant decision should be made with a note of a caution. However, since no caution goes without explanation, the test should go beyond the face value look to the analysis to establish why error should be avoided. Therefore, knowledge involves balancing the errors and accuracy in a skeptical but careful manner. Awareness of the existence of error makes the participants act with caution and limit the side effects of the same. For logical empiricists, knowledge building involves using observations experiments to make an inductive support for hypotheses (Mayop.68). Their argument is that experimental observations are unproblematic, so their purpose of a philosopher is come up with inductive logics for allocating degree of evidential backing to hypotheses. This supposition is, however, questionable as it underlines that errors are not part of learning. Getting knowledge is a matter of deductive falsification. Having an adequate amount of knowledge on a particular subject makes one very skeptical in problem-solving situations to avoid the instances and effects of the error. This is always achieved by planning adequately before making a trial. However, the knowledge of past mistakes come in handy since planning only works for known variables. Thus, avoiding possible errors ahead of time, for instance before starting an experiment or collecting data becomes very helpful with design and planning of an experimental knowledge generation strategy. Further, historically repeated mistakes create some sense of familiarity (knowledge) on how they work, their cause and effect. This gives room for developing a workable strategy to avoid them or check if they count at the end of activity through personal and experimental audits. Through study errors, people often learn the type and degree of effects attributable to various errors or factors in the knowledge production. This evidence is then used to make subsequent inquiries or criticism. It is for this reason that is advisable to create space for allowable error when extracting knowledge. This recognition the existence of errors help prevent their negative impacts on knowledge. Thus, just like accuracy, an error is also valuable in knowledge production. An effective way to glean information regarding the impacts of error is by using techniques that simulate the situation if the error would have happened or were to occur. This gives the participants or knowledge seekers a chance to actively understand the significance that the error holds should it happen. The remedy for such a situation in knowledge production is always preventative in nature. The knowledge seekers endeavor to shield the occurrence of material errors using strong internal controls. Therefore, an error and accuracy are equally valuable in the production of knowledge. Work cited Mayo, Deborah G. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Print. Read More

An outstanding practical example on the significance of an error in knowledge is the case of Thomas Edison (the man who invented a bulb light). Edison made 1000 unsuccessful attempts before he finally came up with a working bulb. This implies that in all his previous steps, Edison had been making mistakes. That is 1000 errors. Logically, it would be argued the process of making a bulb or producing knowledge on how to make a lighting bulb can take 1001 different ways amongst which only one leads to the fact.

The overall argument here is that many things that people know come as a result of at least one failed experiment that paves the way or uncovers the one way that is not appropriate. Learning process then begins from this point. Errors made during the trial to understand something, therefore, significant. Without making a mistake, one would hardly realize when something is not right or correct in the analysis of a phenomenon. Problem-solving which is a significant tenet in the production of knowledge normally seeks for accuracy before an error due to the direct approach of accuracy in knowledge production.

However, it is undisputable to assert that mistakes and failure drive creativity, invention, and innovation in cases where accuracy can hardly be established. Knowledge is not just about reading, watching, feeling and listening to information from another party. Were this true, then there would be limitations on the development new knowledge,and equally, the total net gain in knowledge among individuals would be greatly reduced. What next? People, therefore, make as many relevant errors as possible in their quest for knowledge and understanding of new things, events and situations.

In human daily duties or exploration of old knowledge, people normally have a tendency of asking “what if.?” The steps are always making an attempt by employing the old knowledge at the beginning. However, it sometimes turns out that the old concept is no longer applicable because things change with time and circumstances. After deviating from the old long-held knowledge probably because of an error, misconception or misunderstanding, the new pursuit open doors to an exclusively new area of knowledge that not been explored in the previous attempts.

This implies that knowledge production is an unending process just like daily human challenges and their constructions. Trial and error is a method commonly used in the field of science. No standard of accuracy is emphasized although it involves a lot of knowledge production. The participants anticipate much of error than the accurate result. A clear example in support of this argument is the way curative drugs are tested for efficiency. Several clinical trials are conductedtodetermine what a drug can do in regards to the treatment of a particular illness.

Efficiency is measured against the risk that the drug is likely to bedangerous, effective or ineffective in combating the illness. This is the starting point knowledge and adjustments are made based on the results. Both accuracy and error become very significant tools of knowledge in such a situation. Accuracy help to save the risk and to take caution while an error marks the turning point at which no relevant decision should be made with a note of a caution. However, since no caution goes without explanation, the test should go beyond the face value look to the analysis to establish why error should be avoided.

Therefore, knowledge involves balancing the errors and accuracy in a skeptical but careful manner. Awareness of the existence of error makes the participants act with caution and limit the side effects of the same. For logical empiricists, knowledge building involves using observations experiments to make an inductive support for hypotheses (Mayop.68). Their argument is that experimental observations are unproblematic, so their purpose of a philosopher is come up with inductive logics for allocating degree of evidential backing to hypotheses.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Production of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
The Production of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/2055671-tok-essay
(The Production of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Production of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/2055671-tok-essay.
“The Production of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/2055671-tok-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Production of Knowledge

Managing innovation is key driver of growth in the new economy

ntrepreneurship is considered as a key element in the new economy, and new enterprises are contributing to create a dynamic business environment through economic growth, opening of new job opportunities and innovation of production processes and products.... It is easy to move with a crowd than carve your own path....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Women Management Issues in Fisheries

In the context of a rising lack of self-assurance in centralized, technical fisheries management a few researchers plus policymakers have called for an augmented role for fishers in The Production of Knowledge used in management decisions, and for a movement toward joint management arrangements that engage mixtures of collective, state, and for a number of advocates, confidential control over marine possessions (Apostle et al....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Knowledge and Power in Cambridge University

All these strategies of exercising power work to ensure that the members of the institution who choose to deviate from the stipulated norms are marginalized to make them change and conform to the dominant discourse of knowledge.... On the other hand, the new knowledge acquisition methods have also significantly changed the relationship between the learners and the sources of knowledge.... This paper "knowledge and Power in Cambridge University" paper uses Cambridge University to analyze the relationship between knowledge and power in public institutions....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Childhood Obesity/Parental Education/Implications and Limitations

Challenging Situadedness, gender, culture and The Production of Knowledge, Eburon academic publishers.... The assumption is that this number will represent over 20% of a possible number of people within the population.... The population of the study has been proposed to be made up of students observed to be obese in....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Proposal

Jean-Louis Baudry The Apparatus

The nature of the apparatus sets in here, as it may contain or entirely limit The Production of Knowledge.... However, his assertion that the apparatus may make The Production of Knowledge nearly impossible is still debatable.... Jean-Louis Baudry constructs a hypothetical argument based on the basic conception of apparent movement....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Spurring Human Progress

Development depends on The Production of Knowledge capable of providing scientific mirror of both social and economic challenges facing a nation as well as the available resources that can be used to counter the challenges.... As such, the need to build institutions to generate scientific knowledge was imminent and inescapable (37)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Working in teams

“Power and The Production of Knowledge: Collective Team Learning in Work Organizations.... The purpose of our group project was to prepare a presentation.... While we were planning on presentation delivery, the questions of what to assign to who, how to organize our content and the sessions, how to....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Gender Studie: Women's Point of View

The first point concerns the importance of social identity in The Production of Knowledge.... The relationships between anti-normative knowledge and sexual identity are more complex than just the belief that heterosexuals cannot overcome their 'straight' way of thinking....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us