StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Judgment and Decision Making for Engineers - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Judgment and Decision Making for Engineers" paper contains an analysis of such articles as "Choices, values, and frames" by Kahneman, D., and Tversky, "Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics" by Hogarth, R. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Judgment and Decision Making for Engineers"

Judgment and decision making for engineers Name Institution Date Judgment and decision making for engineers Reading 1.3 Jackall, R, 1988, Chapter 4: Looking up and looking around, in Moral Mazes, Oxford University Press, NY. Decision making is an extensive exercise that requires authority and advanced patterns of management. The way decisions are made in an organization or any profession is the core to their success. Scientific theories have described how managers in corporations make decisions. For example, managers in organizations make decisions through consensus whereby the manager as a leader brings together employees and other departmental managers to work together as a team for the purpose of achieving a common goal. This requires managers to have persuasion skills so as to communicate the vision and use their leadership to lead others in taking action towards a defined goal. Even though teamwork can be seen between managers and employees, it only conceals the different challenges that managers face during decision making. Therefore, it requires authority and professionalism in making rational decisions for managers in an organization. Max Weber and Karl Mannheim are theorists who described how managers make decisions in the organization. They argue that functional rationality is the basis with which managers make decisions in an organization. Functional rationality involves making decisions based on planned as well as calculated activities to achieve a definite goal. These theorists differentiated between functional rationality as well as substantive rationality. Substantive rationality applies to when managers make decisions through critical reasoning and reflection. Here, they assess as well as evaluate the specific goals to be achieved that guide their decisions. Functional rationality applies in bureaucratic settings and critical reasoning does not apply to managers when making decisions. A better decision from a lower level manager can be ignored over the one for a top manager. Lower level managers are required to implement policy. In administrative science, scientific theories suggested a step by step decision making process that should be used by managers so as to make effective decisions for the organization. Example Engineers are people who are required to make decisions from time to time and especially when exposed to risks. The risk of technical defaults during work is a risk situation that engineers may anticipate to occur. Scientific theory applies here and engineers are required to take step by step process so as to make good decisions to deal with the risk situation. Considering that one does not know what will happen and there is a likeliness of occurring of something bad. An engineer should consider these possibilities and take the necessary precautions immediately. Referring to statistics is essential to identify what actions other engineers took in a similar situation. Then, these actions need to be discussed with colleagues so as to share views and come up with better decisions. These steps are essential to help an engineer make good decisions that are consistent with their preferences as well as attitudes towards risk. Reading 2.2 Kahneman, D. and Tvesky, A, 1984, Choices, values, and frames, American Psychologist, Vol.39, Iss.4. Making decisions in risky and riskless contexts is usually determined by cognitive as well as psychological factors of choice. When value is to be considered, a person makes decision to evade risk so as to achieve gains. When one oversees a possibility of incurring losses, the decision to take a risk not to incur such losses will be made. A person accepts a chance of gaining when there is a surety and a high probability of the event to occur. When a moderate or low probability of the event to occur, one will not decide accepting the chance. Based on cognitive and psychological determinants, people make choices depending in different preferences of the outcomes. Rational choice will apply in many cases when an individual is making a decision. In making a rational choice, one is required to process mental calculations by organizing outcomes of events as well as explaining some anomalies of behavior. Specifically, the acceptance of a choice will depend on the evaluation of a positive outcome as the result. If not, then, one will not take that choice. The decision problems in such a case involve people systematically violating the rationalities of consistency as well as coherence. The psychological principles are the determinants in decision making in such situations. The decision problem is usually determined by the options that a person must choose, possible consequences of the actions as well as the contingencies that are associated with the actions. A decision frame that is adopted by the decision maker is controlled by the problem formulation, norms, habits as well as the personal traits of the decision maker. One may have different decision frames that can be compared on various perspectives. Among the various perspectives, the decision maker will select the best alternative that presents the most favorable outcomes. Example As an engineer I have an experience of making choices when faced with situations that are risky. I had two options to choose during my contract at work. I was offered a private job that was paying twice the amount of contract at my work place. At the same time, my contract at work was not complete and I had to attend my daily duties. This was a critical time that needed the best decision to be made. I had to weigh the benefits I will gain from my private contract and maintaining my current job which I am assured of. If I fail to take the private contract, I will loss a pay twice my contract amount. If I take the private contract, I will lose my contract with my current company. I chose to accept the offer with the private company for I was to gain more benefits. Reading 5.2 Hogarth, R,1981, Beyond discrete biases: functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.90, Iss.2. The use of Heuristics in making judgments creates biases to decisions that are made. Heuristics is making use of predictive judgments based on the situation and experience of a person in a particular field. However, these judgments are not always accurate as predicted. Individuals usually apply simplified methods of decision making strategies as well as mental shortcuts to make decisions when they don’t have important information. This makes this decisions complex and sometimes under uncertain conditions that may cause risks if the decisions do not work as expected. These risks increases since inferences and judgments made are inaccurate causing biases as well as inconsistencies. Heuristics usually focus on discrete incidents hence undermining the importance of feedback in the decision making process. The judgments do not accept questioning of various assumptions that are implicit in the discrete. At the end, it may be costly and causing severe errors when optimal judgments do not coincide with the decisions made under uncertainty. However, expert opinion has been established to overcome these biases when making decisions under uncertainty. It is important to note that the use of analytical methods that are suitable for the facilitation of the decision making process will work along way in avoiding biases created by heuristic judgments. These methods are important in evaluation similar situations and providing feedback to experts before making a judgment. The judgment becomes an interactive process which is continuous used by people in coping with the environment. Feedback is important in the ingoing process of decision making as well as questioning of different assumptions that may improve the decisions made. This means that so as to avoid biases through the use of heuristics in discrete incidents, it is essential to apply theoretical as well as methodological processes in a continuous decision making process. Example The predictions made by engineers are questioned when it comes to public safety since the public is not involved when making such decisions. However, as an engineer, I have experience that the judgments made by engineers are reliable. The reason is that engineers apply probability to engineering problems. This yields satisfactory results when the aspects of probability are subjective. They also use parameters to make their predictions hence their opinions are not bias. From my experience, a number of engineering problems are usually addressed by developing a repertoire of heuristics. Engineers make of use of the rule of thumb to make the most suitable decision for a situation. We use an initial hypothesis so as to predict outcomes in the future. The use of hypothesis is a sure way of developing an accurate prediction for engineers. Engineers also use decision support systems to make decisions about the future based on similar events that occurred in the past. Reading 8.1 Linstone, H. (1984), ‘Our proposed perspectives’ in Linstone, H., Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making, North Holland, NY. Multiple perspectives for decision making is today encouraged in many organizations. This is to consider the views of all stakeholders who are involved or affected by the decision. Multiple perspectives for decision making are used in sociotechnical systems. The aim is to make decisions for solving problems that are technological in nature but surrounded and interacting with social as well as human facets. When making such decisions, organizations should understand that technology is entrenched within the environment of human beings. Therefore, technology has the capacity of benefiting people, hurting them as well as changing them or their lives. People have the capacity to make decisions to limit, develop, alter or even stop the technology. This will depend on the effect of technology to the people. Strategic decisions should be made considering the environmental impacts that technology will have on people. Human beings act as social and individual entities. All the relationships in sociotechnical systems must be considered when making strategic decisions including; technical, organizational/social as well as personal/individual relationships. Sociotechnical setting should be evaluated to determine how technology interacts with the organization and support in decision making. Evaluation should also be done to understand how technology impacts on individuals and how the individuals impact on technology. All stakeholders including the family, church, the State, companies, individual beneficiaries and victims, regulator should come together and present their views before a strategic decision is made. The interplay between organizations and individuals is the political power required in making strategic decisions. The final decision will be arrived at after consultations with all stakeholders that affect and are affected by the technology. Continuous review of the strategic decision is necessary when the decision influences technology and the stakeholders. Amendments can be made to arrive at the most suitable decision that favors all. Example As an engineering expert, I have experienced different times when my organization makes strategic decisions. My organization did a public strategic planning for the new technology that was being introduced to the people. The company used a socio-technical approach that involved the application of multi-methodological framework. Decision support systems were used to structure the problem. Different criteria were used to perform the decision analysis. Strategic thinking was applied in the decision making process for the support of all key players. Companies, political actors and individual citizens were present to discuss the objectives if the new technology and how it should be implemented. References Hogarth, R, 1981, Beyond discrete biases: functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.90, Iss.2. Jackall, R, 1988, Chapter 4: Looking up and looking around, in Moral Mazes, Oxford University Press, NY. Kahneman, D. & Tvesky, A, 1984, Choices, values, and frames, American Psychologist, Vol.39, Iss.4. Linstone, H, 1984, Our proposed perspectives, in Linstone, H., Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making, North Holland, NY. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Judgment And Decision Making For Engineers Literature review, n.d.)
Judgment And Decision Making For Engineers Literature review. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2065910-essays-of4-abstracts-about-subject-called
(Judgment And Decision Making For Engineers Literature Review)
Judgment And Decision Making For Engineers Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2065910-essays-of4-abstracts-about-subject-called.
“Judgment And Decision Making For Engineers Literature Review”. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2065910-essays-of4-abstracts-about-subject-called.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judgment and Decision Making for Engineers

Different approaches to decision-making

On another case, when all the three categories of DIY stores are compared, there is a big difference in terms of sales, showing how the sales may be misleading especially where a major decision making is concerned.... The Company executives assumed a normative framework of decision making.... There are several stakeholders who are responsible for decision making in a company.... In this case, the Company's IT expert and project developers (engineers) are the most integral component of decision making in the IT area....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Child Labor Is Defined by the International Labour Organization

Paul has to look at his peace of mind when making this decision.... Paul is seeing this as a career making opportunity.... Child labor is defined by the International Labour Organization (ILO) as work done by children who are under the age of twelve; work done by children who are under the age of 15 that prevents them from attending school; and labor done by children under the age of 18 that is dangerous to their mental or physical health....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Why Simulation Technology Is Being Seen As An Effective Management Tool

hellip; The reason why simulation technology is being seen as an effective management tool because simulation lets front position employees, discipline practiced and decision-makers to have grand ideas, and with the right form of technology to explore how their plans would operate actually prior to making final judgments.... Those means allow managers and engineers to stare into the future, expect troubles, and make proper decisions early on in the planning process to keep further evils at bay....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Problem-solving tools and techniques

Strategic project management: tools and techniques for planning, decision making, and implementation.... Dearborn, Mich: Society of Manufacturing engineers.... You may have a leadership quality ad you may have a quality to take a right decision on a right time.... In a groupthink situation, each member of the group attempts to match up his or her opinions to what they believe to be the consensus of the groupGroupthink, a name created by social psychologist Irving Janis (1972), takes place when a group takes flawed decisions for the reason that group strains escorts to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (p....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Schedule and Cost Control Techniques

Organizations use various decision making models which serve different purpose for the organizations and are built on various basis such as institutive, rational as well as iterative models.... Rational models however are mostly used by the organizations due to the fact that they… nd to take into account the cognitive judgment of the advantages as well as dis-advantages of the various options available for decision making purposes.... om, 2008). It is very important to mention here the fact that besides having Organizations use various decision making models which serve different purpose for the organizations and are built on various basis such as institutive, rational as well as iterative models....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Steve Wozniaks Technical Ability

This research essay “Steve Wozniak” purposes to illuminate the impetus behind Wozniak's innovation and relate it to educational attainments.... The revolution of personal computers owes a lot of credit to Wozniak, the co-founder or Apple.... hellip; The author states that the people around a person play a huge role in defining the path and level of success in life....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Jobs Roles In Middle East

Petroleum engineers are the best paid in the Middle East.... Duties of petroleum engineers include analyzing new oil reservoirs to determine costs and benefits, supervision of the drilling, extraction, and processing progressions.... The role of the financial managers includes managing departments of the financial institution and making strategic decisions on issues regarding the institution.... Qualification for major air pilots is usually good health and judgment ability, acquired a specific flight time, which in most cases should be above 1,500 hours....
2 Pages (500 words) Article

The Necessity of Building a Machine That Is Capable of Distinguishing Right and Wrong

rdquo; This is because the increased innovative technologies of sophisticated systems such as those with moral capabilities require that they are fitted with abilities for moral decision making.... This is because complex and more pervasive stems such as automated aircraft and automated weaponry have demonstrated the transfer of human-decision making capabilities to machines.... In order to develop an artificial moral agent, first, there is the need to bridge philosopher's thought of abstraction and engineers beliefs in the buildable designs....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us